Your top 6

[Seriously]

Coniglio
Patton
Wingard
Tyson
Tomlinson
Longer

 

[Slammer]

1. Coniglio
2. Patton
3. Wingard
4. Buntine
5. Longer
6. Tyson
Hoping for Chad to fall down the order, but..............

 

[blackdiamond]

1. Patton
2. Coniglio
3. Tyson
4. Tomlinson
5. Longer
6. Wingard

 

[Portia]

I'm really not happy about this, and its because of one player that I really want to see solid game footage of - Dom Tyson. On paper he sounds good, and he gets big wraps generally, but the actual footage I've seen makes him look a hell of a lot like Ben Jacobs last year - a lot of only just getting the ball clear, some real clumsy play and overall looking like he's good against boys, but AFL level? I dunno, doesn't sit right for me. It really wouldn't shock me if he was at #6.

I guess the main thing I'd like to know is, what makes him a better option than Greene? He's a couple inches taller, probably a bit faster, but is that it?

1. Patton
2. Coniglio
3. Buntine
4. Wingard
5. Tomlinson
6. Greene/Tyson?

 

[lotum]

also Porthos Buntine and Tyson have yet to play against men even though the TAC cup is strong where as Coniglio and Wingard for example have played against men for 2 years.

 

[Portia]

I'm not so worried about whether or not they have played against grown players, but seeing a style of play that is already based on half-chances and relying on the incompetence of your opponents when you've only played against other underage players, that worries me.

 

[240volt]

Coniglio
Patton
Wingard
Tyson
Buntine
H Simpson

 

[Ford Fairlane]

I thought you would've plumped for Monty Burns 240. Homer's a bit big and strong.

 

[Natman]

Patton
Coniglio
Tyson
Wingard
Longer
Buntine

 

[Check-Raise !]

Wingard
Wingard
Wingard
Wingard
Wingard
Tomlinson

Really like the look and size of Tomlinson .

If we can't get the 'Guard' then I'd be happy
with Tomlinson. Can just imagine him and
Jackson standing next to each other in a year
or two, scary stuff.

 

[240volt]

I thought you would've plumped for Monty Burns 240. Homer's a bit big and strong.

We can always Rookie list Monty, hes about the right size and body build for us.....lock him in Eddie

 

[PRDPower]

Patton
Coniglio
Wingard
Buntine
Tyson
Longer/Smith

 

[PatientMental]

Patton
Wingard
Coniglio
Tyson
Buntine
Longer

 

[Forzaport]

Nothing surprising in my top 6:

1. Patton
2. Coniglio
3. Buntine
4. Wingard
5. Tyson
6. Hoskin-Elliott

 

[Portology]

Guess everyone will have subtly different criteria in their minds for an arbitrary "top 6". I'm not even sure what mine are But thinking about this from a few more angles will have me changing my "draft game" entry. I'm a bit more confident of our pick 6.

1. Patton
2. Coniglio
3. Wingard
4. Tyson
5. Longer
6. Tomlinson
(7. Buntine)

 

[CrimsonRaven]

1. Wingard
2. Coniglio
3. Patton
4. Will Hoskin-Elliot
5. Tyson
6. Tomlinson

 

[Spadge]

So not many here think we will get anywhere near Wingard. Unfortunately I think it will pan out that way.

 

[CharlieM]

Patton
Coniglio
Buntine (My absolute favourite)
Wingard (only because he's an SA lad)
Tyson (think he's slighty better than Chad)
WHE/Tomlinson (sorry on the fence with those two)

 

[Enviable Tradition]

So not many here think we will get anywhere near Wingard. Unfortunately I think it will pan out that way.

Not necessarily.

I have Wingard as number three in terms of who I would pick for Port but I think he is about a 60% chance to come to us tonight.