Usage for hash tag: 4,

Our openers bat #3 and #4, so we're actually doing pretty well.

...in Australian teams of the past many years, a good opener would regularly run out partners very quickly overseas.) And he seems to like being at #4, so #4 it is. Its not as though there are other batsmen demanding any spot, much less a particular one. The "best batsman at #3" is a peculiarly...

...picks back. And yes, I can imagine that either Melbourne or Adelaide would like to keep a pick inside 10 plus one 10-20 for an exchange of #3 or #4, but IMHO that costs us excessively to achieve - essentially we'd spend all our capital to get ahead of a bid on Green and then have nothing left...

...can think of at least 9. They should then recycle with a large intake of draftees, rinse and repeat. The Swans' 2019 first round pick, currently #4, is one of their top currency assets and must be either traded for a quality player in Tier 1 (KPF) or 2 (elite midfield), or used to draft a...

...leave fast enough. Could have easily wound up with 9 wins, which would have put any imaginable concern about the Stocker trade to rest. As it stands, our draft pick is going to wind up somewhere between picks 3 and 6, most likely pick 4, which is about breaking even if Adelaide squirt into...

...would find form again when not stuck in a midfield fighting with Sloane, Crouch x2, Greenwood and CEY. There’s just too much of the same and #4, 5 and 6 of that lot would tend to struggle to play their best footy. 3 of them, plus a developing Milera and Young pace is still a solid midfield...

...best 22 afl.com.au put up at the end of last season for the West Coast Eagles: 2nd round, 3rd round, pick #7 pick #13, rookie pick, pick #14 Pick #4, end of 1st, pick #3 2nd round, end of 1st, pick #11 3rd round, pick #4, 2nd round Pick #2, 2nd round, end of 1st rookie pick, 3rd round, pick...

...The deal was sound at the time but yet may ultimately been seen to be a failure, but not as much as for the player we may have got at picks #2 - #4, but for what we could have done with that pick via trade. It was clear and remains to be clear, that Adelaides pick was earmarked for a...

Maybe not this year ... reckon GWS will have to worry about whoever holds pick #3, #4, #5, ... making a bid on Green. I think they'll just have to proceed assuming someone will bid on Green early on.

Gotta be #3 or #4, you can't have the club logo on there, for accuracy reasons! Still not retracting my answer :drunk:

More like Hill and Tucker for pick #4, their 2nd and their first next season

...offer to the older brother before the trade is across the line for the younger. Five of the bottom six teams are in Melbourne. Picks #2, #3, #4, #5 and #6. I think he is worth more to us than that, it's not like we can replace that sort of outside run, repeat sprint efforts and smarts, but...

...teammates to have in excess of a number of disposals That's seven separate betting instances (forming multis or whatever). I think #2, #4, #6 and #7 are the most serious offenses and could have constituted potential spot fixing. I would have given him 8 weeks per offense (going on...

...I might even try Usman or Marsh opening with Finch, and put Warner at #4 or #5, so long as Davey keeps the run rate up! I'd prefer Maxwell at #4, but it might be a bit of a "Robbing Peter to pay Paul" proposition when shuffling the others around. Our lack of firepower with the bat was known...