I am pretty sure media speculations were 750K for KingU happy to pay king 1million or $650k? Only 1 of them got the deal done
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I am pretty sure media speculations were 750K for KingU happy to pay king 1million or $650k? Only 1 of them got the deal done
Charlie Cameron’s on $750k. Just for comparison’s sake.He has played at that level for 8-10 games. If we are paying 800k for that small a sample size we are idiots. The days of overpaying players is over, people either want to play here or they don't. We shouldn't have to over pay to keep someone here anymore. We've built a better club than that.
King had a full season and a half of great performances to back it up. He also isn't being payed a million a season.U happy to pay king 1million or $650k? Only 1 of them got the deal done
Charlie signed a 4 year 700k deal when he first came across from AdelaideCharlie Cameron’s on $750k. Just for comparison’s sake.
I understand the argument and people will say that's where GWS went wrong but let's not forget the Giants made five finals series over six year period which included a grand final, two prelims and two semi finals. That has to count for something, doesn't it?The answer isn't continue to overpay players.
They are also paying 4 different players 1mil per year on long deals. Kelly, Whitfield, Coniglio and Greene, none of who have been particularly good this year.I understand the argument and people will say that's where GWS went wrong but let's not forget the Giants made five finals series over six year period which included a grand final, two prelims and two semi finals. That has to count for something, doesn't it?
You’d want to hope he’s producing better than CC’s out put now, if you’re paying him more than what CC is on now.Charlie signed a 4 year 700k deal when he first came across from Adelaide
Rankine will be averaging more Goals per game, more scoring shots, more goal assists, more effective disposals and more score involvements than Charlie did in the year he was traded.
If the roles in that scenario were reversed and Adelaide managed to keep Charlie for 800k (I understand he didn't leave for money), do you think they would be upset based on his improvement since then and his output the last few years?
I think Rankine will make AA in the next 2 years and will be a 40+ goal a year small forward for a long time to come, whether he's with us or Adelaide, and I'll be pissed off if we cant find a way to keep him.
We haven’t had a single South Australian walk out of the club, when They get here they love the culture the lifestyle the weather
Rankines uncle becomes a part time SA Suns scoutWell we can't really hand out jobs to family members if said family doesn't live in the state. Can't really hand out cars since we're not sponsored by a car manufacturer. All we can do if ask the AFL for "ambassador" money and hope. At the end of the day we aren't a big Victorian club so we don't get the benefits of one. If Rankine leaves so be it, we did our best to convince him and if Adelaide want to pay a small forward 800k then fantastic.
Thats not the question thoughYou’d want to hope he’s producing better than CC’s out put now, if you’re paying him more than what CC is on now.
Sounds like we had our chance and he wanted to stay but our pissing around allowed other clubs to provide godfather offersThats not the question though
Would you be annoyed if you had to pay Charlie Cameron 800k currently? because I don't think many Brisbane supporters would
Do you think Adelaide would be annoyed if, to keep Charlie in 2017, they had to pay him 800k knowing how good he's become? again I dont think they would.
Rankine is a generational talent, a gamechanger and has all the makings of a genuine superstar. I would be very very okay with offering 800k for 4 years.
Essendon reportedly offered him $800K so the media just assumed this was also offered by the Crows since we are supposedly in the "box set". Rumour is Port Power offered him $750K with them initially chasing him and Rankine inquired about the Crows who offered him below that so likely around $700K.Izak isn't worth 800k.
I know right I thought we were past this as a club smhStarting to get PTSD talking about players being poached. Sigh..
He lived in Adelaide most of his life so he might like the Wintery weather........?Somebody tell Izak to walk out his front door this morning and look at this winter sky, that should be enough to retain him