Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If I can quote from PRE....The stand rule would have been Chris Scott’s idea. So he would have said to Hocking we have been working on it, come and have a look in our intra-club practice match, I think you will like it. Hocking would have said yep keep trialling it and if we like it we will introduce it just before the first practice match. It would have been something along those lines. Cats would have got a massive jump on the rest of the AFL but also would have been likely incorporating it in 2020 post season recruiting and planning etc. Thus they suddenly started recruiting a load of runners like Smith, Cameron, Holmes, Close, which was a departure from previous list management strategy.
It is a blight on the AFL they ever allowed conflicts of interest to play out in this fashion. And it is a huge stain on the Cats 2022 flag. If they didn’t want the stain on them, then conflicted people should have been removed from the loop.
Classic film that
afl and chris salt knew we were gonna win 5 flags making us the greatest team of all time by far and they wouldnt have that now would theyHere's my take on the recent rule changes and how a lot of them were anti-Richmond.
1. 6-6-6 starting positions at centre bounces.
Of all teams, Richmond set up least in this formation. Fox Footy ran a stat that in 2018 prior to this rule coming in, the Tigers setup in 666 something like 3% of the time. This rule therefore theoretically affected us the most.
2. Kick-ins
After a point, the bloke kicking in has free rein to run a fair way and exit defence easily, compared to when you had to stay in the goalsquare. Who were the absolute masters at locking the ball in to our forward line and getting repeat entries? The Tigers. This rule meant that opposition could bypass our pressure/zone.
3. Prior opportunity at ruck contests
Rucks can now take the ball out of the ruck without being penalized HTB. This helped teams with strong rucks and penalized teams who were notorious for using hybrid rucks. Cough..Grigg..cough.
4. Stand.
Think we all know the bullshittery behind this dog of a rule.
There's some other rules that are just crap all round. The ruck nomination rule, protected area infringements, dissent to name a few.
Only half decent rule they brought in was stopping giving free kicks to players who raise/shrug their arm to draw high contact. Although the interpretation of this rule has been woefully applied, it's a good starting point.
royal commission into afl corruption/rule changes to stop rfcIf I can quote from PRE....
There was an interview on SEN with Justin Leppitsch, who was a commentator at the time as he'd left RFC.
He said SHocking was at Richmond training the year before and he asked Leppa about the philosophy/strategy behind how we defended the man on the mark.
After Leppa explained it to him, Hocking said, "well you guys won't be able to do it next year". Later that year, Hosking's introduced the stand rule for 2021
So the Stevie Hosking triplet gets kudos.
Scott can take credit for "dissent" Now heading to a club. Wonder how EFC go with the Scott dissent rule.
I fn hope we deal with these rules better next year.
those compliments look decent
You'd specially request himthose compliments look decent
so would I
Haha.............I actually read it as it sounds "Andrews focus will be running Essendon like a club" So actually not running it as a club but something like a clubI read the word running as ruining in Essendon's tweet.
Lady can do whatever or whoever she wants…but my god am I questioning her tastes, Daniel, the dude from St Kilda and the kid from Western Bulldogs were all better options!Jesus Christ. Gonna have a bad reputation
yes she can. her tastes are clearly footballersLady can do whatever or whoever she wants…but my god am I questioning her tastes, Daniel, the dude from St Kilda and the kid from Western Bulldogs were all better options!
Good on her, I guess.yes she can. her tastes are clearly footballers
yeah you only live once right! hahaGood on her, I guess.
Steven May though? Either way…none of my business, probably shouldn’t have replied to a post from Friday. Lol
Didn’t even realise it was from Friday, I’m so far behind.
Rule 1
Him and pies seem a natural fit?Tepenyaki coming back out of retirement. Anyone but the bombers it seems (and probably Hawkforn).
would probably loose more members if tim baxter was ceoGood on him, will be interesting to see what their membership is like next year. Surely even the delusional Essendon supporters don’t want this guy as their CEO?
Compare trade notesYou'd specially request him