MRP / Trib. James Sicily - 3 weeks for dangerous tackle - SUSPENSION STANDS!

Remove this Banner Ad

Healy is a shocker. He's actually in the minority with this along with Whately. Not sure what incident he's looking at because it's not the James Sicily tackle and he clearly isn't interested in anyone arguing against his point of view. Real know it all with a bit of smugness. Always had an issue with Hawthorn too. Never has a good thing to say about us.
Probably because he hardly ever played in a winning side against us
 

Log in to remove this ad.

They can't disagree with either of those points!
The dislikes on the posts are just from people who dislike Sicily as a person and have no functional thoughts beside what their crappy instincts tell them to think.
 
"Hawthorn didn't waste time asking James Sicily if his name was James Sicily.

They're not here to be intimate with the proverbial spiders."


Little bit of humor from the AFL media team, pretty funny. :D
 
"Hawthorn didn't waste time asking James Sicily if his name was James Sicily.

They're not here to be intimate with the proverbial spiders."


Little bit of humor from the AFL media team, pretty funny. :D
Is it?

It's lost on me.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

ab78a627e6063e0a13bc3badd78d5c92.png


The **** is that
 
ab78a627e6063e0a13bc3badd78d5c92.png


The * is that

Standard lawyer stuff - any lawyer worth their salt always tests the admissability of evidence of the other side. The lawyers are employed to do their best, even if the AFL's lawyers potentially ruin the game because of that :p

Curious what argument they put to the expert evidence, but sounds like it was quickly dismissed, so doesn't sound like solid ground anyway

You just hope like the above, the arguments shake out in favour of Sic and sanity rules out
 

Remove this Banner Ad

MRP / Trib. James Sicily - 3 weeks for dangerous tackle - SUSPENSION STANDS!

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top