- Jun 1, 2013
- 1,500
- 2,317
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
Where do we sign22 is definitely on the table for Daniel but not as a straight swap. Likely 22 and 40 for 32 and Daniel.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Where do we sign22 is definitely on the table for Daniel but not as a straight swap. Likely 22 and 40 for 32 and Daniel.
I don't want us to "win" trade period, but I'd like to see us respond to whatever deficiencies we learned we had from the season with a couple handy trades. We can't just rely on natural development for that.Oh no we don’t win the trade period then I wish we could be like the bombers and win it every year instead we will just have to hope on natural progression from Darcy Ugle-Hagan Richards Naughton Busslinger Weightman Sanders O’Donnell West Freijah
22 is definitely on the table for Daniel but not as a straight swap. Likely 22 and 40 for 32 and Daniel.
Don’t need context for some things. Matt Eagles
Still one year left on contract, something around the mid-30's?Any idea what a trade for O'Halloran would look like?
Which we can address in the draftI don't want us to "win" trade period, but I'd like to see us respond to whatever deficiencies we learned we had from the season with a couple handy trades. We can't just rely on natural development for that.
Getting more realistic.22 is definitely on the table for Daniel but not as a straight swap. Likely 22 and 40 for 32 and Daniel.
On the pain index, Trade Radio is just Roaming Brian with ads
I think his assessment of Naughton and JUH was very interesting and Darcy and also how good of a job Bevo has done with what he had at his disposal. He knows that VDM and McNeill aren’t the best players, but they are what we’ve got. That’s where we will improve, upgrading positions like that.Just listened. Rocket as always is very good to listen to. Reminds me of listening to Terry Wallace, super intelligent.
His reading of the Bailey Smith trade is what a few have been saying here, that the pressure is actually on Geelong now because they’ve made all the big promises. In the Jeremy Cameron trade they didn’t want to give up all those top picks to GWS, but in the end they had to because they wanted him and promised him.
And likely have to wait on at least a year or two of development to see the benefits of. Trading is important. Nobody's saying "Butters or we're ****ed", but I think it's reasonable to be disappointed if we don't attract anyone that really improves us. Not even blaming the club, just would like to see it happen.Which we can address in the draft
Id think both picks and CD would be too much?I’d pack Daniel’s lunch, fasten his back pack, kiss him on the forehead and drive him down to Arden Street.
Freijah impacted instantly this year for usAnd likely have to wait on at least a year or two of development to see the benefits of. Trading is important. Nobody's saying "Butters or we're ****ed", but I think it's reasonable to be disappointed if we don't attract anyone that really improves us. Not even blaming the club, just would like to see it happen.
The irony of Norf getting rid of all their older players and rotting at the bottom of the ladder for the best part of a decade and now they recruit washed up old blokes, essentially putting them back to where they were 10 years agoNORTH WAITING ON DANIELS DECISION
NORTH WAITING ON DANIELS DECISIONtodayspaper.theaustralian.com.au
The Kangaroos spoke with Western Bulldogs’ playmaker Caleb Daniel last week and are expected to land Swans’ veteran Luke Parker, 31, and West Coast forward Jack Darling, 32, next month.
Daniel, 28, is yet to decide whether he will pursue a move from the kennel, following jet ballwinners Bailey Smith (Geelong) and Jack Macrae (St Kilda) out the door. He is expected to make a call on his future this week, after talks with the Kangaroos on their vision for the next few seasons and the Dogs about his spot in the side.The Dogs could demand a second-round pick for Daniel who played 16 games this year, including his best performances in the last three games of the season.
In particular, Daniel’s excellent kicking skills would help North’s ball movement in the back half and middle of the ground.
But the Dogs would hold the upper hand in any trade talks on Daniel’s future, as he is contracted on a deal worth about $700,000 until the end of 2026. The Dogs can also afford to keep Daniel, who is a popular team member, as the departures of Smith and Macrae clear up significant salary cap space for the club.
Would Geelong?Not to get ahead of ourselves, but unless a player is included, would we have the necessary trade capital to satisfy port with current/future picks?
GWS would ask for our second rounderAny idea what a trade for O'Halloran would look like?
No thanks... they can convince Peatling to come to us and we could package bothGWS would ask for our second rounder
So we could do
Him + F3
Second Rounder + 4th
GWS would ask for our second rounder
So we could do
Him + F3
Second Rounder + 4th
Wouldn’t be paying more than that for Peatling either both 24 and would struggle to have 100 games combined (minus ones as sub).Not worth it imo. Would only be trading a 3rd rounder for him at most.
Weird post. Who sh*t in your cornflakes?Oh no we don’t win the trade period then I wish we could be like the bombers and win it every year instead we will just have to hope on natural progression from Darcy Ugle-Hagan Richards Naughton Busslinger Weightman Sanders O’Donnell West Freijah
Of course not. Why would he want that?Would a guy like Hinkley swap all his top 4s for 2GFs and a flag?
Peatling is 24 and played 45 games with a large number as sub XOH is 24 and played 67 they may or may not upgrade out B22 but the reality is the difference they’d make isn’t going to be that significant to pretend we should call the period a “disaster” they’re C graders at bestWeird post. Who sh*t in your cornflakes?
It’s perfectly natural to look at players that will lift our bottom 6. A couple of problem areas on the list that we’d be better off addressing. Players like Peatling and XOH address that.
Since 2016 I would take Ports record over ours anytimeWould a guy like Hinkley swap all his top 4s for 2GFs and a flag?