Roast AFL aggenda

[SunshineBoy]

So after our girl goes the tribunal and is fined the AFL appeals the verdict, they have now ONLY appealed two tribunal decisions in their history both against guess who RICHMOND, let’s see if our new CEO has balls

 

[_RT_]

So mad that you added an extra g to agenda

 

[Freddy Swift]

So after our girl goes the tribunal and is fined the AFL appeals the verdict, they have now ONLY appealed two tribunal decisions in their history both against guess who RICHMOND, let’s see if our new CEO has balls

According to the AFL, they have appealed two other Tribunal decisions which involved contact with umpires. One against Toby Greene and one against one of the Curnows.

Amazing how they often seem to want to appeal against Richmond verdicts though isn’t it?

 

[Groupie_]

125 years the cfl has had it in for us

first they wouldnt let us enter the comp in 1897

then they had anti Richmond umpires umpire in early grand finals against us

and remember when we won the grand final and they gave essendon the flag ?

 

[Wrenny]

 

[Dunger]

mongrel corrupt cheats

 

[SunshineBoy]

So mad that you added an extra g to agenda

I’m stamping my feet

 

[Meteoric Rise]

Vile organisation.

Sheerin gave a perfectly reasonable explanation for what happened. It is reasonable for her to expect her opponent is balanced enough to provide enough resistance to not fall into the umpire. It is not her fault the girl collapsed like a deck of cards with minimal force.

It is an incident you don't want to see happen, but the opponent chose to put herself between Sheerin & the umpire in a context where she has to expect Sheerin will try to push her out of the way. It is illegal to hold or grab her. So Sheerin can only push her in one direction from there. Or choose not to contest, which is clearly out of the question.

It is the opponent who made contact with the umpire and the opponent who chose to place herself in a position where this was a likely outcome. If you also look at number 9's positioning against Mckezie it is not right. She is facing away from the ball with the sole itetio of blocking Mckenzie's path to the ball. Sheerin's opponent is positioned with the exact same thing in mind.

I would think the Essendon player is at least equally culpable in the umpire contact here.

 

[Steely Brown Eye]

I hope Sheerin head butts lozza not-so-keane to sleep, a nice big coma falcon, 12 weeks

 

[_RT_]

I’m stamping my feet

 

[Drunken Wookie]

I'm so anggry

 

[SunshineBoy]

That’s me

 

[Tiger_4_Life]

Such flipping bullshit

Corrupt maggots across the men's and women's comps

 

[Lord of the Wings]

125 years the cfl has had it in for us

first they wouldnt let us enter the comp in 1897

then they had anti Richmond umpires umpire in early grand finals against us

and remember when we won the grand final and they gave essendon the flag ?

Remember when we signed Tony Lockett in the early 90s and the CFL stepped in a sent him to Sidney instead

 

[HumanMeatball]

AFL w getting a thread. Equality at work

 

[Tigerandy63]

I have a real problem with a controlling body appealing a decision put forward by a panel THAT THEY APPOINTED!!!

In my mind this can only go one way, and it won’t be in our favour. Appeals tribunal supposedly independent (yeah right), but they will be under strict instructions to appease their boss.

 

[Bojangles17]

So after our girl goes the tribunal and is fined the AFL appeals the verdict, they have now ONLY appealed two tribunal decisions in their history both against guess who RICHMOND, let’s see if our new CEO has balls

flipping r souls , HTF do they prove that was intentional to push oppo into umpire, clearly careless not intentional, prob our best player right now too

 

[Bojangles17]

Vile organisation.

Sheerin gave a perfectly reasonable explanation for what happened. It is reasonable for her to expect her opponent is balanced enough to provide enough resistance to not fall into the umpire. It is not her fault the girl collapsed like a deck of cards with minimal force.

It is an incident you don't want to see happen, but the opponent chose to put herself between Sheerin & the umpire in a context where she has to expect Sheerin will try to push her out of the way. It is illegal to hold or grab her. So Sheerin can only push her in one direction from there. Or choose not to contest, which is clearly out of the question.

It is the opponent who made contact with the umpire and the opponent who chose to place herself in a position where this was a likely outcome. If you also look at number 9's positioning against Mckezie it is not right. She is facing away from the ball with the sole itetio of blocking Mckenzie's path to the ball. Sheerin's opponent is positioned with the exact same thing in mind.

I would think the Essendon player is at least equally culpable in the umpire contact here.

View attachment 2154470

View attachment 2154472

View attachment 2154474

Nevermind the illegal blocks that weren’t paid , no 22 Mackenzie’s opponent not even looking at ball