Search results for query: *

the wookie - close, but you are not seeing the forrest for the trees. Re-read the whole act. consider: scope process purpose on last hint. 3.03 cant be the AFL. DYOR. out for good/

do you want a game changer? Wait until September 7. Surely the AFL-Asada havnt agreed to cut Wada out... have they? Somebody is going to have a little bit of explaining to do. Goodbye.

Perhaps, but we can only guess at what happened. If Dank had half a brain, and I have no doubt he does, he would have phrased the question as "what is the status of this xxxxx". Asada, being the authority (which Dank conclusively deducted through a previous chain of communication to WADA)...

Actually, what Fahey has said so far is consistent with the way wada has acted in the past. If you read his quote, he admits he doesn't know the details of this case. He is speaking in general terms. If you want a reference, read up on the Mexican players case where they were caught with a...

The AFL code clearly refers to Asada, the Asada Act 2006 and the NDS. The Act is there to apply an international code, such as WADA. Any government act will always reserve its rights, and this one is no different. Effectively, wada is only enforceable in this country, in law, through the Asada...

Sorry, this is my area of livelihood and wanted to clarify something which has bugged me. If you read the ASADA Act 2006 it clearly states that ASADA can modify any international code in its discretion. Asada is the relevant authority in this country, nobody else. Legally speaking, WADA and...