Search results for query: *

I think you picked my sarcasm but just in case you didn’t: I was being sarcastic. Your points about the squad being totally different and yet having the same problems is spot on.

Bloody hell. I was not far off what he would say

Guys, it’s the players, like it was the players in 2023 and 2021 and 2020 and 2017 and 2014. Coaches only coach for minor round games, then hand it over to the players for the finals.

Koch: this loss was because millenials and zoomers aren’t prepared to sacrifice enough to buy a home

Koch: this loss is because Gold Coast didn’t honour their contract to not wear red

Koch to come out and blame the SANFL, probably

Sack the campaigner before the press conference

And yet, we see this with different playing groups but the same coach… Yep, it’s the players, clearly.

Zerk-Thatcher just stood back watching Rozee get tackled by multiple opponents

All the hallmarks of a Hinkley special, including a goalless quarter

Just sack the campaigner

Every kick forward is to a pack

All season, this zone has sucked. Our best run of form has been when we got rid of it. Of course, the ****wit has put it back in place in our first final.

It’s no coincidence our defence looks better when we are not playing this ****ing ridiculous zone.

But, yeah, this is a typical Hinkley finals

This kind of performance from Esava was brewing for weeks. He had one good game but following that has not been able to win a contest. Add Dixon to that and the forward line is completely dysfunctional. I really like Rioli but we have been misusing him lately. Too often, he is the target, not...

Spoiler: they don't. That was what made the commentary in the game against Freo so refreshing. While Pav clearly wanted Freo to win, both he and Schofield had clearly watched us play through the season. They were not just repeating canned phrases, like the Victorian-based commentators. While...

His form and his willingness to fly the flag for teammates through this last stretch of games is why he deserves the opportunity to go around again if he so chooses.

Dan is Schrödinger's defender

It looks like Adrian Anderson threw the kitchen sink into his submissions. From Zita's reporting on Twitter, evidence and submissions went for at least 2 hours.

I suspect that's right. I'm surprised the reasons each week are as detailed as they are. That said, I know the chairs, so I shouldn't be surprised. Also, skimming reports of the proceedings, it sounded like Adrian Anderson, for Melbourne, took a long time in evidence and submissions.

That's veering close to defo

The Pickett hearing went 3 hours

So, I see O'Farrell is not the magician the media cast him as. He didn't get Owie off last night. (Note: this isn't a dig at O'Farrell. I know and like him. It is just frustrating to see facile assessments of lawyers based on their results)

No*, but I'm likely to know the person who ends up doing it. * not my area of law.

See, you all shit on Melbourne and then you lap up about the most Melbourne story going around.

I missed big parts of the game due to a weekend of drama with a family member. I caught the end though and it really seems like there is suddenly a bit of metal to our game. It might not always be pretty but it seems to stand up when the opposition throws everything at us (at the moment, at...

I didn't expect to wander into this thread having to dodge strays.

This is a perennial question with David.

Russ was unlucky to miss out on mention for North Melbourne then.