Search results for query: *

Thinking we're about to be hit with a trade request or two..

If what Twomey says is true, it makes me think Adelaide have more planned for the trade period and want to get this deal out of the way.

Honestly, I have very little time to watch them myself. Just going by what I've read.. It seems I confused myself with Knightmares 'freakishly quick tall' comment.

Fair enough. A traditional tap ruckman I'd say no way. But those rucks that play a lot like midfielders I'd at least consider. By all reports RT's freakish athleticism could add an extra dimension.. I would still rather Hollands personally.

I presume the theory is that we would have all day to 'wheel and deal' that pick should we decide to trade... But it's more or less inconsequential in the scheme of things.

I agree... but it's kinda ironic too, I reckon half the comp would happily give up Pick 1 for a Brodie Grundy or even Dean Cox in their prime.

If memory serves correctly he said something similar when we chose Nicks over Yze too.

Only really worth it for us if we're keen on Phillips or DGB? Presume McDonald and Hollands go 1 & 2 in that scenario. Not sure Hawks would be in a hurry to help out the Swans either.

I like it! I've been of the opinion that we should be looking at Hawthorn or GC pick as an upgrade to get both Hollands and Thilthorpe. The question for me is who would Hawthorn be interested in? I suspect DGB, but reckon he goes to Swans. Presuming Hollands and McDonald go one or two. Would...

**Adem

Alright, which one of you is Jack Lukosious? :think:

The old Tim Paine rule.

Can't wait to see all the new Bigfooty avatars now that Burton is gone!

The only thing I can see that justifies Nicks drop in odds is a tweet by Sam Edmund of the Herald Sun... So just more Journos clutching at straws by the looks.

Beat me to it!

Strange, I can still see it on the mobile site, but not my work PC. Odds have changed though, Nicks is down to $1.25! Yze back out to $10. Seem to have culled a fair few names from the list too.

Neck and neck with Fitzy I hear.

Matty Nicks just dropped to $6 on Sportsbet.

Fine, we'll take him then.

No way Port moved up that high just to take Hately.

I'd do this if we could also get 24 and 29 back. Then try and bundle them to someone, maybe Richmond for a late first. 3, 17, 21, 73 & 83 is still a decent hand.

You are right! When you consider what Adelaide will receive and could potentially utilise the picks on tradewise. We'll still arguably be in a good position. None the less, I thought it was an amusing thread. Would much rather Cockatoo than a departing Lever right now.

Honestly, I'm not the most avid follower. But I've noted fellow supporters have gone from raving about him a year ago to shitting on him now. I'd suggest he's close to be delisted.

Well then... You're more or less correct.

As mentioned previously, missed a handful of games, hence the low tally of votes. Insinuating we fixed it out of spite is laughable. In saying that, I do agree the deal won't go through for two firsts. I think the rumoured 10 and 27 will be about right, also won't be surprised if it happens...

Given we drafted him at pick 14 in 2014 after every one before us was scared off due to injury history, fair to say we did recognise his value.

Hypothetically, if Carlton did accept 13 and Kerridge for Menzel and 20 (not saying this would be the deal), what would 20 & 28 net us in points return, surely enough for Sydney's first round. What about GWS pick 8?

I've seen almost every recent SA draftee linked in this thread. Just had a look at the previous coulple of drafts and three others stand out to me that I have yet to see mentioned. Luke Dunstan - Woodville Trent Dumont - Norwood Sean Lemmens - Port I know next to nothing of any of them, but I...

This. As much as I love DBZ, the original will always be my favorite. The Red Ribbon saga is probably my favourite storyline of any show.