Search results for query: *

Again correct. Wobbler Ings said the same. Won't stop the fanboys. Hey Asada lets take on a 40 mill per year footy club that we gave poor advice to and prosecute them under a catch all clause there are NO precedents of success under. Great idea.

HOW hard is it for people to understand? ASADA did not tell the EFC or ACC that it was prohibited under s0. They cocked up. During 2012 they neglected to give this guidance to Essendon and the ACC.

READ the second para CLEARLY. subsequent clarification by WADA on 22 April 2013 of the status of AOD-9604 as a prohibited substance under the S0 classification. The WADA statement confirms that AOD-9604 was a prohibited substance, both in and out of competition, during the period of activity...

Wada. What did Asada say in 2012?

In April this year. Coincidence that the ACC report and the EFC both had wrong advice?

Semantics. There is a clear difference between permitting use and say "IT IS NOT PROHIBITED"

AS I POSTED YESTERDAY. Asada cocked up. They did not mention S0 to the EFC or the ACC. Players were told in May by an Asada official they are OK. Move on. Hexarelin anyone?

STOP speaking sense. Its hard for others to take. It is clear what happened. Asada should have said it was prohibited under s0. They didn't. They said it was not prohibited under s2 and did not mention s0. To the ACC and to the EFC. Then the s0 confirmation was done by Wada in April this year...

EXHIBIT A - "AGAINST THEIR WILL" http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/afl/essendon-players-forced-to-take-injections-against-their-will/story-e6frexx0-1226572134797

EXHIBIT A - "AGAINST THEIR WILL" http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/afl/essendon-players-forced-to-take-injections-against-their-will/story-e6frexx0-1226572134797

Not the worst post. No doubt Asada have been digging and digging.....Will they get anything conclusive? Tough given Dank's professional second life. Wait and see.

Bumped... SPREWELL replied to the thread Investigation into Essendon Fitness Program. Told today "Asada fkd up" - from a lawyer involved in the case. Players were told weeks ago they are fine. Going to be some sad sacks... Yesterday at 8:45 PM

IRRELEVANT given during 2012 Asada informed the EFC that it "Was not prohibited." Semantics or not they are cooked. Whatley doesn't go off half cocked. Read my post from yesterday.

Fanboys on here hoping that Thmyosin or something else is proven are not very funny. Fk this is gold. Even better is those thinking points will be stripped after erroneous advice for a drug that does not even enhance performance. This finals series is going to be A1

Well said.

BANG. Seldom come on here, will be here more now. GOLD

Told today "Asada fkd up" - from a lawyer involved in the case. Players were told weeks ago they are fine. Going to be some sad sacks on here. Fine, draft picks + Bomber T and Corcoran joining Robinson Dank Robson. Take it to the B A N K

ON CAMPUS. Good luck proving David Myers had it and Angus Monfries didn't. Club in all sorts. Players fine.

BUCKLE UP KIDS. Not going to be pretty for some here. Dons fans start smiling... Gill + Andy both stating "conjecture" in the last week = coincidence?

DONS FANS CARE? We cheated in 93 and I have not spend a nanosecond caring. Glorious flag. As will next years be.

All he more amusing players already told they are clear

Time to prove it. Why was it named generically? Dons aren't dumb. Players careers at stake. Tis goes straight to court

Care to beat on that? Bill Kelty Demetriou Evans Hird "Doors opened"

Spot on.

Only a High Court sports lawyer.

Not saying it will get them off. I am saying it will be the defence. Can someone find a precedent anywhere of an S0 prosecution? The available clinical evidence is that it is not perf ehancing and that it is avail in products for sale.

The legal argument (as ambulance chase Barret laid out) will be that the supplement has been clinically proven not to increase HGH, so is not perf enhancing. Whilst not approved for human use and banned under s0 there are few if any precedents (INGS admits this) of prosecution under this part...

Or it will be finished in a day. WATSON IS DUMB. THE CLUB IS DUMB. Comments tonight were a slip up. Likely.

He said he believed the substance complied with anti-doping regulations at the time. Essendon is also believed to have received advice from anti-doping authorities last year that suggested the use of AOD-9604 was permitted. Read more...

DID TWENT not do this?