Search results for query: *

I made literally no comment on Selwood's ability to influence games in the balance. Nor Johnson's, for that matter.

Bye rounds can change things around very quickly though...

Sandi-****ing-lands. 2402 with him being given an extra 11 points.

Ouch. Still though, you would be up there on the rougher end of the stick, I think 3-4 will be the common amount (thankfully I avoided the worse ones with Pav, Jaensch and Swallow who didn't really score terribly but he cost most teams 30 points on their yearly averages)

Par would be 2300? Pav, Swallow, Mitchell, McDonald, Jaensch, Riewoldt, Watson, Aish, Zorko all went under par, but we had some great scores from Ablett/JKH/Polec/Langdon/Kennedy/Rockliff/Libba/Danger/Ward that will surely rescue a lot of teams.

Got to get that injury-affected 7 out of his scores, so should continue to decrease in $$$ over the next couple of rounds again. Might bring in after the Pies/Eagles game (round 10) as an upgrade for Langdon..

Mundy 97 Fyfe 110

With Sandi 106 and Pav 57 I sit on 2383, looking for 17 more points, I hate being just off those 'milestone' scores...

Would have thought he would top couple on the ground, bet he was at long odds before the game!

Have the Crows released an update on Jaensch yet? Suspected broken ribs, if he is out for 3-4 it might be enough to give me an excuse to trade Jaensch out and sure up my round 8 team. He's gained 120k so if he's going to miss a few, on top of a 56 and 39, might be perfect time to trade him to...

Not much chance of Pav kicking the winner either if the Dockers keep this up!

True that, would take 90 from him though which he is on track to get.

Sandi carrying my team in this last game (i.e. Pav is doing nothing)

OP created thread saying why do people not rate SJ in the top echelon and he dominated. Not sure how OP has failed? He/she was not bagging Johnson..

How is Fyfe a cheat then?

Combo of Sandi/Cox/NicNat hitting it to Barlow, Fyfe, Mundy, Hill, Shuey, Masten kicking to Pav, Kennedy, Darling...

Has to be a draw in a Derby one day. No more scores for the rest of the match!

Tigers a nice foundation to work on. Reset during the bye and keep improving and they could get 12 wins..

2300 (approx) with a half from Sandi & Pav to go. 2380 from here I reckon. Unless my Cats/Tiges players get scaled up.

1.8 to 1.1, geez won't get those opportunities all game you'd think

Good points - my main suggestion though (backed up by nothing) is that maybe the standalone clubs play better because 1) they are playing for the team, not win back their spot in the seniors 2) they play together more often (rather than having 6-8 in & out weekly in some cases) 3) the...

David Attenborough would be delighted to give commentary on pavilion using a computer.

He's been underpaid the last 3 years, deserves whatever he asks for I think (not actually realistic though unless GC want to lose a Bennell or similar). Don't think I'd say the Suns have arrived on the back of that game, but the main thing is - their undeniably talented youngsters are turning...

Don't really care about your posting either :thumbsu:

Donate your body to science, they will be interested studying your brain I think.

Will be happy with any result, been a great fightback from the Tiges so far and the Cats were a joy to watch early. My main interest now is Johnson, Enright, Cotch, Martin SC-wise. Johnson also needs to get over 121.5 for my bet. The rest of the players can sit on the ground for all I care...

Tigers can take it to the Cats but we can't restrict the Suns run for more than a quarter. Ok mete. Strange footy this year, great to watch though knowing that all these 'team A easy' games can actually be interesting.

Forwards. We're sitting at 4-3 with a comfortable run home, obviously a week is a long time in footy and so 10 weeks is even longer, but we would likely winners based on year to date in 5 or 6 of our last 7, with some games likely to be against teams who are right into 2015 & managing mode. So...

The same basic team that also finished 14th the year before. Agree with most of what you've said, but you are vastly overrating what our players were like back then. And by what you originally posted, sounds like the person was not talking about the coaching, merely the players. You might say...

1793 with SJ, Enright, Martin, Cotch, Pav, Sandi. Or alternatively 2033 with 1/2 to come from SJ/Enright/Martin/Cotch + full games from Pav & Sandi.