14,583

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

D_One19 keeps persisting and keeps getting owned.
You haven't played finals for 5 years yet you troll the Crows who are equal second.
You get 14,500 to a home game yet you troll the Crows Crowd numbers.
Sounds like you need a shovel there! So much fail...
 
D_One said:
I think the polynomial shows the real trend of the Camry Crows crowds. Limited by capacity in the 90s there is a slight increase in line with the opening of the Northern Stand followed by the obvious nosedive that every Camry Crows fan is so keen to deny.
Click to expand...

Now everyone can see you are full of shit because if your 3rd order polynomial prediction is true then the crows crowd will plummet only because the numerical value of the year increases. So in the future the crows crowd will be negative infinity. Only in your wet dreams.

But if we happen to choose a 4th order polynomial the Crows crowds will increase to positive infinity as the value of the year increases.


I'm not trying to predict crowds in the future. I'm just demonstrating that you are full of shit with your graphs nd trends.

I think that has been done. But please keep posting.
 
Mattrox said:
Now everyone can see you are full of shit because if your 3rd order polynomial prediction is true then the crows crowd will plummet only because the numerical value of the year increases. So in the future the crows crowd will be negative infinity. Only in your wet dreams.

But if we happen to choose a 4th order polynomial the Crows crowds will increase to positive infinity as the value of the year increases.


I'm not trying to predict crowds in the future. I'm just demonstrating that you are full of shit with your graphs nd trends.

I think that has been done. But please keep posting.
Click to expand...

The 3rd order polynomial trendline is not a prediction ... it is there to identify trends.

PS. Thanks for all those graphs showing the Camry Crows crowds have trended down in the last few years. ;)
 
Geoffa32 said:
As I said they only need you to exist. Prosper means playing finals and building a squad to contend a flag.

Look to the NBA to see the model the AFL is chasing. More teams means more TV rights money, but few of those teams are ever really going to win a Championship.

Existance is guranteed by the AFL and SANFL. The club/supporters needs to do the rest to make it prosper. That is what makes up the gap between us and you. As both clubs operate in the exact same environment in regards to the SANFL. Well kinda, you guys don't pay an annual distribution or Northern Grandstand payment. These two cost us $1.2m each year.
Click to expand...
I don't think you can make that claim until we move into Adelaide Oval and our finances are completely different. With more money = a better chance to prosper. Agree of disagree?
 
D_One said:
Here's a stat.

AFL Premierships:

Port Adelaide: 1
Fremantle: Zero, zip, zilch, nada, SFA, nought, a big duck egg. :thumbsu:
Click to expand...

Relevance to thread: Zero, zip, zilch, nada, SFA, nought, a big duck egg.
 
TheRoo32 said:
Exactly. Could also see Poort Power making history again next week playing the Hawks down at Launceston. The 165 is in grave danger I think... :D
Click to expand...
Maybe if the Crows played them down in Tassie some records would be broken, after all they beat you by what, 10 goals this year? Top 4 pretenders :oops:
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Stewies Power said:
I don't think you can make that claim until we move into Adelaide Oval and our finances are completely different. With more money = a better chance to prosper. Agree of disagree?
Click to expand...
Of course.

But what makes you think moving to AO will mean more money? It is not certain.

Will the Stadium Deal be any different. Will our clubs be able to collect the match day revenues in a cleaner stadium and pay an annual rent, as they do in WA.

Plenty of clubs in Victoria play in front of sub 20k crowds in a CBD venue and lose money on those games. They make their money by selling games and playing against bigger drawing Vic clubs.

A pure location change from West Lakes to Adelaide Oval will not change much in the long term.


You will still need more people to attend games at AO. Once the novelty wears off, and if the club is still failing on field, what then? If you can not increase market share above the suggested 30% the move wont make any difference.

Nor will holding the licence.
 
afl08 said:
Relevance to thread: Zero, zip, zilch, nada, SFA, nought, a big duck egg.
Click to expand...

Is it relevant to look at how your club was going just before the AFL saved it from going around the S-bend?

Code: 
2000 Round 17   Venue: W.A.C.A.   Date: 01-Jul-2000   Att: 10,826
Fremantle	4-5	6-5	9-8	12-10	82
Port Adelaide	1-1	1-8	3-12	8-16	64
 
Stewies Power said:
Why is there a failmantle supporter in here? :confused:
Click to expand...

Well in case you've forgotten, that 14,500 was actually Poort vs Fremantle which thus gives us a right to comment.

We drew 30k against you at Patersons and yet you only draw 14.5k. That's an indictment on poort
 
D_One said:
Is it relevant to look at how your club was going just before the AFL saved it from going around the S-bend?

Code: 
2000 Round 17   Venue: W.A.C.A.   Date: 01-Jul-2000   Att: 10,826
Fremantle	4-5	6-5	9-8	12-10	82
Port Adelaide	1-1	1-8	3-12	8-16	64
Click to expand...

At a 20k stadium which is just of 50% of capacity compared to Poort filling up just 35% against Freo.

Meanwhile the AFL did nothing as we cleared our debt ourselves
 
afl08 said:
At a 20k stadium which is just of 50% of capacity compared to Poort filling up just 35% against Freo.

Meanwhile the AFL did nothing as we cleared our debt ourselves
Click to expand...

20K hey???

Code: 
2000 Round 8   Venue: W.A.C.A.   Date: 29-Apr-2000   Att: 26,554
West Coast 4-6 8-9 9-15 15-18 108
Wstn Bulldogs 3-7 9-9 11-12 15-12 102
 
D_One said:
Is it relevant to look at how your club was going just before the AFL saved it from going around the S-bend?

Code: 
2000 Round 17  Venue: W.A.C.A.  Date: 01-Jul-2000  Att: 10,826
Fremantle 4-5 6-5 9-8 12-10 82
Port Adelaide 1-1 1-8 3-12 8-16 64
Click to expand...
I see that even at their lowest ebb, they were still able to comfortably account for Port. :thumbsu:
 
afl08 said:
Well in case you've forgotten, that 14,500 was actually Poort vs Fremantle which thus gives us a right to comment.

We drew 30k against you at Patersons and yet you only draw 14.5k. That's an indictment on poort
Click to expand...
No doubt Lyin's boring football kept a few away.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

14,583

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top