Yes we will and we wont have to give them a F2 but happy to throw a bone #64 or #73We won't get 7 and 12 without giving them an F2 maybe F3 at a stretch back IMO.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Yes we will and we wont have to give them a F2 but happy to throw a bone #64 or #73We won't get 7 and 12 without giving them an F2 maybe F3 at a stretch back IMO.
Or we offered to pay some of his wage insteadWe won't get 7 and 12 without giving them an F2 maybe F3 at a stretch back IMO.
Uncontracted spud Saad went for pick #8 dan is worth 50% more and is contractedName me one 28-year-old half back that's gone for 2 x 1st rounders in a trade? Pick 7 is not mid-late either.
Support Groupie through all his diet's and sexual issue'sRichmonds worst supporters:
- support everyone on the board blindly
- support louie meehan
- support 100milion dollar blowout on facility build
- support the use of fluro instead of yellow on our sash
- support green , red and blue sponsors on our jumper
- want to give away players for nothing
do I go on
I'd say we will be doing that for sure.Or we offered to pay some of his wage instead
Uncontracted spud Saad went for pick #8 dan is worth 50% more and is contracted
#8 & #12 is the price Dimma if you want your toy boy
Two mid to late first rounders isn’t over compensated
That’s market value
Let’s say Rioli was uncontracted and requested a trade. What do you honestly believe his market value in a ‘fair’ trade is?
- Rankine 22yo went for pick-5.
- Dawson 25yo a 1st rounder tied to Premiers Melbourne.
- Saad 26yo for pick-8.
- TT 24yo for 12 and 19.
- Dunkley 25yo #21 and Lions F1.
- Cerra 22yo #6.
- Stringer 22yo #25 and #30.
Of course he’s contracted and we don’t need to be ‘fair’, but what’s your honest assessment of what his ‘uncontracted’ market value is?
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Wanting to trade Rioli is a bad business/culture move by the tiges.
He was the young player that Cotch/ Riewoldt wanted to sacrifice their careers for so he could enjoy the success in the future.
He was also a big role player in the bond the team created over the 2017 preseason.
He is a centrepiece in the culture that is the Richmond Football club.
We lose him the club will slowly dissolve back into the basket case pre 2017.
He is a leader in the Indigenous space within the club, does a lot behind close doors that us supporters just don’t see.
Also, being 28 the start of next year isn’t really a problem. He could easily play til his 33-34 and win another flag at the back end.
Trading him is a massive gamble that isn’t necessary. We have the draft capital to get another high end pick.
I remember many wanted him delisted lol. We will miss him, then again we have an opportunity to go crazy in the draft and believe it’s best for the club.
Yeah reckon we still would have won the 3 flags without Rioli, can't say the same about Dusty lol. Outlandish statement.
I think there is likely to be some sort of very complex deal if Rioli goes to Suns.
Suns will want a very high draft pick to be certain of getting ahead of a bid on Lombard, late picks to pay for Lombard, and Rioli of course, so they get 3 class players into the club. They will, or should be, willing to leave just about nothing in the till to get that.
Their first 5 picks this year, 7, 12, 20, 27, 34 plus their 2025 round 1 pick, expected value around pick 12. Also Lukosius or the pick he nets them in a trade, say pick 17 from **** knows who. I reckon they will give all of that up to get a top 3 pick, Rioli, and the points to make Lombard happen without going into deficit. Especially if they can get some salary paid for Rioli.
The WA clubs will want Bolton and Baker, and Graham between them it seems. Eagles will get Graham for nothing given a decent contract offer. Let's say Eagles want to snap up Bolton and Baker as well. They have pick 3, a possible Barass rd 1 comp pick 4?, pick 23, 59, and their future rd 1 pick to play with, expected value around pick 6-8. I would think they would give all that up for Bolton, Baker and a pick around 12 in the 2024 draft to get a good WA kid, say Allen, and maybe another pick in the teens. If the Barass pick ends up end of rd 1 then they won't expect the second pick in the teens back and will just use that pick instead.
Richmond wants premium draft picks in volume and looks prepared to give up Bolton, Baker, Rioli, Graham, and their array of later picks in the 2024 draft to get them.
From Suns: picks 7 20 27? F1 to Richmond, 12, 17, 34 to Eagles
From Eagles: picks 3, 23? F1 to Richmond, 4, 59 to Suns
From Richmond: Bolton, Baker to Eagles, Rioli picks 41, 51, 57, 64, 73 to Suns
Richmond in: picks 3, 7, 20, 22,23,27, Suns F1, Eagles F1
Richmond out: Bolton, Baker, Rioli, Graham, picks 41, 51, 57, 64, 73
Eagles in: Bolton, Baker, Graham(FA), picks 12, 17, 34
Eagles out: Pick 3, 4, F1,23,59
Suns in: Rioli, pick 4, picks 41, 51, 57, 59, 64, 73
Suns out: Lukosius, picks 7, 12, 17, 20,27, 34, F1
I possibly have that tilted a bit too far Richmond's way and both Eagles and Suns will retain a pick in the 20's, so Richmond don't get 23 or 27.
Richmond would go to the 2024 draft with picks 1, 3, 7, 20, 21, 22, 33, 39 and enter 2025 with a full book of our own picks plus Eagles and Suns rd 1 picks. You would imagine in this type of scenario we would look to trade picks 33 and 39 for a pick in the 20's or some future picks. Or it may be Richmond needs to give up 33, 39 in this deal to balance it in order to secure all the round 1 picks that should be on offer.
On Rioli then I doubt it is going to be a simple matter of Rioli for 1 or even 2 picks. It is more likely to be a part of a much bigger deal where 3 or even more clubs are getting involved to get what they want. Rioli's uncontracted value in an average draft would be around pick 9-10 I think. Saad didn't go for pick 8. He went to the Blues for a pick that ended up at 10, but pick 48 went with him to the Blues, which was worth enough to say the deal was worth about pick 12-13 overall. Rioli's contracted price has to be better than pick 10, probably pick 6-7. His contracted price with some salary paid...it is pick 6-7 + another decent pick, with pick 12 very much in play imo.
Who was the last B&F winner to leave us and how did it turn out?Performance like this have very much underlined our position that the price is their first two pics ,,,let’s face it most clubs would do the same especially them, he’ll win our bf by a mile
Why? He’s contracted to us and they want him, they can pay all his wage, we aren’t a ****ing charityI'd say we will be doing that for sure.
Lids, we win a flag.Who was the last B&F winner to leave us and how did it turn out?
If he wants to go, we will work out a trade.Honestly, I ca't see us letting Rioli go. I reckon the only two we are 100% of losing are Bolton and Graham currently.
You got me , not sure it’s happened in recent memory , it’s rare you’d let someone that good go but we’ve just endured our worst season since 1908 so drastic action requiredWho was the last B&F winner to leave us and how did it turn out?
Geoff Raines ooops Lids and we won a flag or twoYou got me , not sure it’s happened in recent memory , it’s rare you’d let someone that good go but we’ve just endured our worst season since 1908 so drastic action required
Forgot about himLids, we win a flag.
But Rioli hasn't said he wants out. This is a media driven trade discussion. You reckon Dan looked checked out on Sunday?If he wants to go, we will work out a trade.
Simple really.
The days of holding players when they want out is gone.
This isn't the NRL, no player comes out during the season and says they are leaving. Rioli would be fully aware of the intense media speculation. He or is management could easily have shut it down with a public statement saying he is fully committed to the club and that there is absolutely no truth in the rumours. More so since he is contracted until 2027. it would be the easiest thing in the world to do. We know that GC want him and he hasn't. We have to read into that what we will.But Rioli hasn't said he wants out. This is a media driven trade discussion. You reckon Dan looked checked out on Sunday?
Also bear in mind this is GC. Not only have they got academy kids coming out of their ass, but they are same club that gave away a pick 7 and a player as part of a salary dump for a third rounder. They simply don't value draft picks in the same way that we have to. Plus Rioli would probably be the biggest recruiting coup in their history and Hardwick loves him. They'd hand over two firsts in a heartbeat.Two mid to late first rounders isn’t over compensated
That’s market value
Agree if he wants to go wouldn’t stop it, as long as the trade is a massive win for us.If he wants to go, we will work out a trade.
Simple really.
The days of holding players when they want out is gone.
If he wants to go, we will work out a trade.
Simple really.
The days of holding players when they want out is gone.
Because with retirements and trades we will have freed up millions of dollars in cap space and will probably struggle just to meet the minimum cap spend with the profile of our list. GC have plenty of picks but not plenty of cap space. We'd be silly not to tip in some cash to ensure premium picks in return.Why? He’s contracted to us and they want him, they can pay all his wage, we aren’t a ****ing charity
Na he was trying extra hard cos he knows he’s only got couple more games to thank RichmondBut Rioli hasn't said he wants out. This is a media driven trade discussion. You reckon Dan looked checked out on Sunday?
Because with retirements and trades we will have freed up millions of dollars in cap space and will probably struggle just to meet the minimum cap spend with the profile of our list. GC have plenty of picks but not plenty of cap space. We'd be silly not to tip in some cash to ensure premium picks in return.