yaco55
Hall of Famer
I had Melksham pegged at 25 to 30. EFC probably got the better end of the deal, but no trades are equal.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney v Port Adelaide - 7:40 / 7:10 Fri
Squiggle tips Swans at 57% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
LIVE: Geelong v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Cats at 54% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Prelim Finals
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Gee whiz you'd think he is literally the worst player in the league going by this board!
I wish him all the best, hopefully Goodwin and Roos can get the best out of him
Re: 17. Jake Melksham
Pendlebury for mine.
Re: 17. Jake Melksham
Scott West.
Re: 17. Jake Melksham
Yeah, I can see West.
Good call.
And burying Carlton that time.Thanks for pick 25, Jake. And that one Geelong game.
I'm definitely happy to let him go for 25, but I wouldn't be surprised at all if he comes good for you. Might see this as a win-win in 12-18 months.I cant believe we got a Pendlebury/Scott West for pick #25..
I should be happy but for some reason I'm not…probably because he's shit, well done on bending us over minus the lube.
I hate my ******* club so much..
I cant believe we got a Pendlebury/Scott West for pick #25..
I should be happy but for some reason I'm not…probably because he's shit, well done on bending us over minus the lube.
I hate my ******* club so much..
So we apparently have a particular half back role for him based on run and carry with some midfield stints. From what I've read from most Bomber supporters he has some decent attributes but can go missing. Sadly we don't have decent running types off half back so we could (ironically) get value.
It sounds like a definite case of it being a (potentially) bigger gain to us than loss to you guys.
So we apparently have a particular half back role for him based on run and carry with some midfield stints. From what I've read from most Bomber supporters he has some decent attributes but can go missing. Sadly we don't have decent running types off half back so we could (ironically) get value.
It sounds like a definite case of it being a (potentially) bigger gain to us than loss to you guys.