- Nov 30, 2006
- 4,023
- 7
- AFL Club
- Richmond
What crap.
Tambling has always been a midfielder. He is forced to play FP a few times until he puts on some weight and he usually plays up the ground. Watch him play, he gets most of his possies in the middle
-
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
2004 Draft Revisited
- Thread starter _RT_
- Start date
- Tagged users None
What crap.
Tambling has always been a midfielder. He is forced to play FP a few times until he puts on some weight and he usually plays up the ground. Watch him play, he gets most of his possies in the middle
Well i sat through his 6 goals against us and i can tell you that three of them came from him running up at the ball turning and busting through packs and kicking goals on the run from outside 50. That all leads to matchwinner in my book. The other 3 came from marks, couldn't tell you if they were contested or not.
You started the poll and the BF supporters have voted, what is your response?
BTW haven't been able to work out what ********************* is. Maybe F*#king gun
No but averaging 19.25 touches a game in your first season as a 17yo in the worst midfield in the competition does.
He also averaged 24.25 in the four games leading into the Brisbane game where he was injured in the first quarter.
Pretty damn good stats for a first year player, guess thats why he was the AFLPA Best First Year Player.
_RT_
Community Leader
- Sep 17, 2006
- 47,254
- 92,105
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Furies Premiers 2010
- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #155
First off *************** translates to soft and the second part rhymes with sock.
As for the poll I knew that the Tambling "Blunder" would win but at least it provides decent discussions to some degree. Would like to see the poll again in 12 months time if Tambling has the year that Tigers fans are hoping he does. Especially if Griffen continues to play as well as he has.
For the record, in the Carlton game Buddy took 1 contested mark. In the Tigers game he took 2 marks total(1 contested).
Nit picking but my source has Murphy averaging 17.5 per game and 23.5 last 4 but still they are decent for a kid no denying that.
I didn't include his last game against brissy in his overall stats as he only played 8 mins
- Nov 30, 2006
- 4,023
- 7
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Firstly that was when Geelong were on fire.
Secondly, Franklin's career most amount of kicks is only 14... against Geelong.
I agree with this, the injury game should not be included in his average.
Strapping Young Lad
Moderator
- Apr 19, 2006
- 100,589
- 252,273
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Storm, Spurs, Socceroos
- Moderator
- #159
oh, please.
Watch the game again, and stop reading the crap that gets sprouted on BF.
The six goals Buddy got against the Tigers, much like the 6 against the Blues were due to his agility, reading of the play and flair.
To say he just sits at the back of packs and waits for the ball is complete crap.
You are so desperate
, Now you're questioning a player and how he kicks his bags of goals, Not only does Franklin avg the same or more in contested possessions and contested marks than any young kp going around, he avgs more than Tambling in both of those stats, he doesn't need to run up on the wing getting the easy ball and inflating his stats like Tambling does, While Franklin is kicking goals and having an impact on matches in the forward 50 even winning them of his own boot, Tambling on the otherhand is just a uncontested fairy gathering useless possessions playing a soft as butter brand of footy.
_RT_
Community Leader
- Sep 17, 2006
- 47,254
- 92,105
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Furies Premiers 2010
- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #161
The 6 goals he got against the Tigers was achieved with him taking 2 marks for the game. IF you say both marks resulted in goals that leaves 4 he got from cheap uncontested ball. Now is that what you want from a KP prospect.
News flash Tambling is not a KP Franklin is supposed to be, the fact he does not do what other KP's do is there for all to see. On 1 hand Hawks fans say Franklin compares with the likes of Richo an experienced KP because they averaged similar goals per game then when it gets shown he does not do as much as an experienced KP they want to then compare him to the young KP's. It is either 1 or the other. Either he is as good as other KP's no matter the experience level or he is one of the best young KP prospects.You are so desperate
Which says he is also a better crumber than Tambling, more strings to his bow.
The fact that when one side of his game isn't working he has another part which will damage you.
Just because he didn't mark the ball doesn't mean it was not in a contested situation where he got those goals, Remember he does avg more contested ball gets than Tambling. and he gets most of his ball in the forward 50.
But the whole point is that as a KPP and also as a crumber Franklin is far superior and a better complete player compared to Tambling, Not only does he have the same or if not a better contested ball and contested marks than the other younger kpp in the league he's also better at what you call Tamblings strength which is his roving capabilities, he scores more goals crumbing than Tambling, also he doesn't inflate his stats by running up the wings getting easy ball, Tambling's 0.1 avg contessted marks and has less contested ball gets means Tambling gets more easy ball.
Not only is he exceptional Young KPP, he is also kicking goals which is the ultimate aim of a forward which compares well with Richo this year, the fact that he has more avenues to goal makes it even more special.
Think I mentioned this before, but if you actually watch some footy games it's really going to help you out. Franklin's humiliation of the Tigers defenders that day was impressive, and re-emphasised the enormity of Terry's draft blunder. You seem to place more emphasis on stats rather than what takes place on the footy field. Here's a stat for you: 6 goals. Expect more of the same over the next few years. In the meantime you'll have to keep making up excuses for why Tambling struggles a this level. Must be hard.
Think I mentioned this before, but if you actually watch some footy games it's really going to help you out. Franklin's humiliation of the Tigers defenders that day was impressive, and re-emphasised the enormity of Terry's draft blunder. You seem to place more emphasis on stats rather than what takes place on the footy field. Here's a stat for you: 6 goals. Expect more of the same over the next few years. In the meantime you'll have to keep making up excuses for why Tambling struggles a this level. Must be hard.
Poor Realistic Tiger, he's fighting a losing battle.
acr2751
Club Legend
buddy is very much in front of tambo at the moment even in front of the #2 pick.
but i still think tambo will be the goods and do justice to his draft pick
i do not see this as a dud pick
but i still think tambo will be the goods and do justice to his draft pick
i do not see this as a dud pick
Footydraft's predicted Top 5 was as follows:
Round 1
1. Richmond - Brett Deledio (Mur)
2. Hawthorn - Ryan Griffen (SA)
3. Western Bulldogs - Richard Tambling (NT)
4. Richmond - Lance Franklin (WA)
5. Hawthorn - Jarryd Roughead (Gip)
The only shock about us picking Tambling at 4 was that he was still there... Oh dear parrot, you're not a very smart man are you....
Oh I see, so Terry uses Footydraft.com for his drafting decisions. Might explain a few things. Think I'll stick with the opinion of the most respected recruiters at the time, who ranked Franklin clearly above Tambling. Turned out to be the right call didn't it.
Oh I see, so Terry uses Footydraft.com for his drafting decisions. Might explain a few things. Think I'll stick with the opinion of the most respected recruiters at the time, who ranked Franklin clearly above Tambling. Turned out to be the right call didn't it.
Oh, those mysterious "respected recruiters".... well of course they did, if you say so
Give me a spell. Show me where one "respected recruiter" said Franklin was "clearly" above Tambling BEFORE the draft. It must be easy for you to do so - every recruitment mgr is in your mobile huh?Sorry, but you are inventing things, again. You poor delusional boy.
Oh, those mysterious "respected recruiters".... well of course they did, if you say so
So how does it work at seasons end at Tigerland? Does Terry turn his computer on and go to footydraft.com, and work out his draft choices? Interesting. May explain some of the Tiges recent drafting gaffs.
- Nov 30, 2006
- 4,023
- 7
- AFL Club
- Richmond
So you're sticking with Greg Miller?
Hard to. Look at the Tiges terrible list management over the past 5 years. Someone needs to take responsibility, not just Terry. It's almost as though they don't want to break out of their 25 year mid-ladder finish cycle. Quite funny.
_RT_
Community Leader
- Sep 17, 2006
- 47,254
- 92,105
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Furies Premiers 2010
- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #173
Which says he is also a better crumber than Tambling, more strings to his bow.
The fact that when one side of his game isn't working he has another part which will damage you.
Just because he didn't mark the ball doesn't mean it was not in a contested situation where he got those goals, Remember he does avg more contested ball gets than Tambling. and he gets most of his ball in the forward 50.
But the whole point is that as a KPP and also as a crumber Franklin is far superior and a better complete player compared to Tambling, Not only does he have the same or if not a better contested ball and contested marks than the other younger kpp in the league he's also better at what you call Tamblings strength which is his roving capabilities, he scores more goals crumbing than Tambling, also he doesn't inflate his stats by running up the wings getting easy ball, Tambling's 0.1 avg contessted marks and has less contested ball gets means Tambling gets more easy ball.
Not only is he exceptional Young KPP, he is also kicking goals which is the ultimate aim of a forward which compares well with Richo this year, the fact that he has more avenues to goal makes it even more special.
As you have been pointing out constantly Tambling gets his possessions up the ground, as a link man between the defenders and forwards. He does not have to stay home and kick goals. We had more than enough players kicking goals during 06 that we did not have to rely on 2-3 like the Hawks did.
You also say that he might have won the ball in other contested situations to kick his 6 goals against the Tigers and for that fact the Blues. The stats show he had a total of 3 contested possessions for a total of 12 goals, in those 2 games, he also had a total of 9 marks (2R 7C) and of those 9 only 2 were contested. As much as people choose not to take notice of stats the fact is in this case they don't lie, Buddy does not win contested situations you clsim he does.
In fact he to show just how 'good' he was in the contests in the Tigers game he had his Career best in Uncontested Possession (16). So while his opponent was trying to win the ball(which is stupid when you are a defender) Buddy would just hang out of the contest and wait for the loose ball or the handball out the back. KP prospects don't do that they go and win their own ball, no wonder the Tigers did not select him. We prefer our KP to win their own ball rather than hang out the back of packs.
tambling was expected to go at 2. he even thoght so himself, particulary as he stayed at a hawthorn person's house (buckanera i think). there was much doubt if he would make it to 4.
franklin had big questions over his attitude. it was thought that although he was talented, he may not be able to back this up with application and work ethic. the go-home factor was also a worry. after two seasons these havent been disproved.
most judges (including burgatron) had it tambling before franklin. history so far tells us that franklin has been better, but i wonder if this will last, considering many of the recruiters believed tambling was second best in teh draft and also franklin's question marks mentioned earlier.
ps. parrot is a knob
franklin had big questions over his attitude. it was thought that although he was talented, he may not be able to back this up with application and work ethic. the go-home factor was also a worry. after two seasons these havent been disproved.
most judges (including burgatron) had it tambling before franklin. history so far tells us that franklin has been better, but i wonder if this will last, considering many of the recruiters believed tambling was second best in teh draft and also franklin's question marks mentioned earlier.
ps. parrot is a knob
_RT_
Community Leader
- Sep 17, 2006
- 47,254
- 92,105
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Furies Premiers 2010
- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #175
Footydraft's predicted Top 5 was as follows:
Round 1
1. Richmond - Brett Deledio (Mur)
2. Hawthorn - Ryan Griffen (SA)
3. Western Bulldogs - Richard Tambling (NT)
4. Richmond - Lance Franklin (WA)
5. Hawthorn - Jarryd Roughead (Gip)
The only shock about us picking Tambling at 4 was that he was still there... Oh dear parrot, you're not a very smart man are you....
Not only did they have it rated that way but Matt Burgan the guy that does the AFL's Phantom Draft had:
1. Brett Deledio Richmond
2. Richard Tambling Hawthorn
3. Ryan Griffen WB
4. Jarryd Roughead Richmond
5. Lance Franklin Hawthorn
I would take the opinion of a guy that actually talks to recruiters at the clubs.
