- Banned
- #51
heres mine, fairly similar to others already posted but oih well
B: Chick, Glass, Hunter
HB: Stenglien, Lynch, Wirrpunda
C: Fletcher, Cousins, Braun
HF: Embley, Gardiner, Sampi
FF: Matera, McDougall, Seaby
R: Cox, Kerr, Judd
I: Staker, Waters, Wooden, B. Jones
guys who probably will play a reasonable amount this year but wouldn't quite be in the top 22: Nicoski, Butler, Adkins, Banfield, Hansen, Selwood, Gaspar ( very reluctant to put himin the 22 since we havn't seen very much of him).
He have a reasonable amount of depth in that squad. I think if they were all in form that team would be pretty damn good. Our only obviouse weakness is CHB where Lynch, Staker, Gaspar, Graham shoudl all be tried there this season so we can see who will be the best for 2006 when we push for the premiership.
B: Chick, Glass, Hunter
HB: Stenglien, Lynch, Wirrpunda
C: Fletcher, Cousins, Braun
HF: Embley, Gardiner, Sampi
FF: Matera, McDougall, Seaby
R: Cox, Kerr, Judd
I: Staker, Waters, Wooden, B. Jones
guys who probably will play a reasonable amount this year but wouldn't quite be in the top 22: Nicoski, Butler, Adkins, Banfield, Hansen, Selwood, Gaspar ( very reluctant to put himin the 22 since we havn't seen very much of him).
He have a reasonable amount of depth in that squad. I think if they were all in form that team would be pretty damn good. Our only obviouse weakness is CHB where Lynch, Staker, Gaspar, Graham shoudl all be tried there this season so we can see who will be the best for 2006 when we push for the premiership.