Exe Gesis
Kylo was here
- Sep 6, 2005
- 148,229
- 98,259
- AFL Club
- Tasmania
Cowboys were underdogs so were rams packers
-
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
NFL 2012 NFL - Week 6
- Thread starter balmainforever
- Start date
- Tagged users None
Dirty Bird
Pokémon Master
Stop stalking me please.
ps - If you're going to troll me. Firstly a) Check what you're quoting (as I said Rams were underdogs) and b) know what the **** you're talking about. (as the giants were favourites)
Dirty Bird
Pokémon Master
Ignore him, he's a troll. His main form of entertainment these days is following me around to try and prove me wrong.
I thought that was Chad?
Although the simpleton got shot down earlier, he still hasn't backed up his claim "RG3 plays they beat the Vikings as the Redskins have more weapons"
Lol
it could have been anyone who made that post, I would have replied, don't flatter yourself. Misread your line RE The Rams, but the Giants were not favourite vs Carolina so please
"know what the **** you're talking about"
Dirty Bird
Pokémon Master
Congratulations. You've just made yourself look even more foolish
I think the line closed at Carolina -2.5 so twarby might be right there.
Exe Gesis
Kylo was here
- Sep 6, 2005
- 148,229
- 98,259
- AFL Club
- Tasmania
So, like I thought, obviously using the line from Vegas, the underdogs have won more on Thursday Night Football, as favorites find it hard to bounce back in a short week, mentally take the game off.
Underdogs in bold...
Cowboys d. Giants
Packers d. Bears
Giants d. Panthers
Ravens d. Browns
Rams d. Cardinals
Titans d. Steelers
Underdogs 5-1 in TNF
(for future tipping reference)
Underdogs in bold...
Cowboys d. Giants
Packers d. Bears
Giants d. Panthers
Ravens d. Browns
Rams d. Cardinals
Titans d. Steelers
Underdogs 5-1 in TNF
(for future tipping reference)
Chadwiko
@ChadwikoTWW
- Sep 25, 2004
- 23,711
- 39,651
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Washington Commanders, Boston Celtics
I thought that was Chad?
Although the simpleton got shot down earlier, he still hasn't backed up his claim "RG3 plays they beat the Vikings as the Redskins have more weapons"
Lol
Actually I said that if RGIII plays I think the Redskins will have the offensive firepower to win.
Redskins are one of the highest scoring teams this year.
Redskins are 4th in the NFL for rush yards, 7th in the NFL for offensive yards, 8th in NFL for points per game.
Vikings have a very good defense as well, and their D has been playing excellently this year. So it should be a good game.
I just believe that if RGIII plays, the Redskins can win it.
If he doesn't, then it'll be extremely hard for us.
Dirty Bird
Pokémon Master
Stuff Vegas.
Go off Australian betting markets. Actually makes sense.
3-3
Go off Australian betting markets. Actually makes sense.
3-3
So, like I thought, obviously using the line from Vegas, the underdogs have won more on Thursday Night Football, as favorites find it hard to bounce back in a short week, mentally take the game off.
Underdogs in bold...
Cowboys d. Giants
Packers d. Bears
Giants d. Panthers
Ravens d. Browns
Rams d. Cardinals
Titans d. Steelers
Underdogs 5-1 in TNF
Packers were favourites, so 4-2, but at the line would be a more accurate measurement of who I guess is competitive, its 5-1 for the underdogs, the Bears the only dog not to cover. Safe to say if you are an underdog & at home Thursdays you'll be up for the match.
and dirty bird, all Aussie bookmakers do is copy overseas markets for US sports, so wherever you looked Giants would have been underdogs...
maybe next time
larkis
Win it for Him
Can someone please tell me how the Rams were underdogs? Did not understand that one bit.
Exe Gesis
Kylo was here
- Sep 6, 2005
- 148,229
- 98,259
- AFL Club
- Tasmania
Cards were 4-0 and rams 1-3. Tho playing at home would've shortened their odds
Dagless
Hall of Famer
Giants to cover, Smith to look good vs our terrible (re: injured D), everyone to praise the 9ers as having 'proven the O can win big games', despite all things suggesting they SHOULD have a good game on O.
- Mar 28, 2007
- 2,299
- 495
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
Cards were 4-0 and beat the Brady and the Pats, Rams were 2-2 beating only Rookie QBs. I would have rated the Cards pretty big favourites. I understand that, but i'm still shocked that the Panthers were favorites over the reigning champs?
Dagless
Hall of Famer
After Nicks was confirmed out...
- Mar 28, 2007
- 2,299
- 495
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
Forgot about all those injuries. I still thought they were going to win, mainly because i don't rate panthers at all
balmainforever
Dibs
- Sep 4, 2003
- 25,762
- 30,644
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Balmain, GreenBay, Edmonton, Celtic
- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #168
Sorry, but how does the giants-cowboys game get into these figures????
Thought the game was played on Wednesday night and it was on ESPN and not NFL Network.
Thought the game was played on Wednesday night and it was on ESPN and not NFL Network.
Exe Gesis
Kylo was here
- Sep 6, 2005
- 148,229
- 98,259
- AFL Club
- Tasmania
I'm not sleeping early to wake up 4am to watch Raiders get hammered.
RedZone is always excellent viewing, but i'm too tired still.
RedZone is always excellent viewing, but i'm too tired still.
TennisPlayerAndy
Game #6 Klay
- Apr 1, 2008
- 59,567
- 107,075
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Liverpool, Raiders, GSW, QPR, NYM
The Jaguars are going to find a way to lose.
- Feb 28, 2009
- 37,502
- 34,678
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- Baltimore Ravens, Atletico
Dirty Bird
Pokémon Master
R.McClain 
Baby_Jenks
All Australian
- Nov 29, 2011
- 667
- 76
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
- Other Teams
- Detroit Lions
Finally! A special teams play by the Lions. C'mon Stafford, drive it in.
Dagless
Hall of Famer
Stafford has looked pretty meh this year... Numbers coming through pure volume rather than actual performance.
Dem Lions still dem Lions...
