Position 2017 Rucks

Your starting ruck combo?

  • Gawn/Goldy

    Votes: 11 4.4%
  • Gawn/Grundy

    Votes: 3 1.2%
  • Gawn/Sandi

    Votes: 83 33.5%
  • Gawn/Ryder

    Votes: 3 1.2%
  • Gawn/Nank

    Votes: 6 2.4%
  • Nank/Sandi/Witts

    Votes: 45 18.1%
  • Sandi/Witts

    Votes: 34 13.7%
  • Other

    Votes: 63 25.4%

  • Total voters
    248

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
^Nank clearly most better pick going off that

I would say Ryder. His last game was the one without Lobbe!
Agree with Significant , Ryder's last match with 80% TOG is what we can expect as the number 1 ruck

Nankervis stats look a bit inflated, low hitouts numbers a concern. What happens when guys like Cotch, Dusty, Caddy, Prestia, Rance, etc actually have good games and score well
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Agree with Significant , Ryder's last match with 80% TOG is what we can expect as the number 1 ruck

Nankervis stats look a bit inflated, low hitouts numbers a concern. What happens when guys like Cotch, Dusty, Caddy, Prestia, Rance, etc actually have good games and score well


Nothing. Nankervis will score what he's supposed to score according to his ability.

Now if he was a midfielder? Sure. Possession share could be an issue.

Hitouts to advantage, mobile ruckman who will be sole ruck hitouts to a strong midfield. He should score well.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

My team just looks sexier when i ditch Gawnilands for SandiWitts.

Ryder up FWD for both, but i can change the whole dynamic of my side when i free up 450K with Gawn.


Fortune favours the brave yo
No Gawn just makes it easier for the SC Gods to make you their bitch
 
I'm a Ryder on the Gawndilands train

You've probably mentioned it on a previous page steve, but what's your thoughts on Grundy? Were his JLT scores concerning?
 
I'm going slightly left-field with my R2, as long as he's the stand alone ruck I'll be picking Tom Hickey who I think can average 105+, he's easily worth the extra 90k over Nank imo.
 
Preuss named however I still think I'll start with Cameron as R3 as I reckon he will have a better opportunity. THoughts?
 
You've probably mentioned it on a previous page steve, but what's your thoughts on Grundy? Were his JLT scores concerning?
I think he'll pump out another 90-95 average. He doesn't get enough hitouts to make the most of the +5 hitouts to advantage
He averaged something like 23 touches last year, I really can't see that increasing, so I don't know where the extra points are going to come from
I wouldn't worry about the JLT scores

I think his average will decrease this year, but that's just 2c
 
Preuss named however I still think I'll start with Cameron as R3 as I reckon he will have a better opportunity. THoughts?

Probably 50-50 on opportunity, but if you have a F/R (Nank/Ryder) in your FWDs, then it does make the decision easier
 
Preuss named however I still think I'll start with Cameron as R3 as I reckon he will have a better opportunity. THoughts?
I'm thinking Cameron as well, he'll definetly get an opportunity.
Issue is that if the Swans keep winning, which they will, whoever gets the nod this week (Naismith? Sinclair?) could perform well and not lose his spot
 
I think he'll pump out another 90-95 average. He doesn't get enough hitouts to make the most of the +5 hitouts to advantage
He averaged something like 23 touches last year, I really can't see that increasing, so I don't know where the extra points are going to come from
I wouldn't worry about the JLT scores

I think his average will decrease this year, but that's just 2c

I "liked" your comment, but I really hated it since it just makes the R1 decision even tougher.

Had no idea he averaged so many possies last season.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top