- Sep 14, 2005
- 18,419
- 18,675
Quick question, was pondering today, reading through the HUN.
With all the scenarios the AFL is trying to come up with to help work through the AFL season while the World Cup is on which include things such as starting in Feb, or having 8-9 week breaks ect. Do you believe the Premiership team of that year will ever be accepted as true Premiers compared to that of the previous year or the following one? Will it go down in history as one of those Premiers that 'didn't deserve it' because of the circumstance? Similiar to the arguments they make for the WWI, WWII Premiers when most of the players were at war, or there was only 4 competing teams ect.
With all the scenarios the AFL is trying to come up with to help work through the AFL season while the World Cup is on which include things such as starting in Feb, or having 8-9 week breaks ect. Do you believe the Premiership team of that year will ever be accepted as true Premiers compared to that of the previous year or the following one? Will it go down in history as one of those Premiers that 'didn't deserve it' because of the circumstance? Similiar to the arguments they make for the WWI, WWII Premiers when most of the players were at war, or there was only 4 competing teams ect.