He got off lightly. Would’ve got 2 weeks if he’d played.$20K & he wasn't even playing.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He got off lightly. Would’ve got 2 weeks if he’d played.$20K & he wasn't even playing.
Me/us.Who?
How much did they fine Daisy this week?
Now Ed charged by MRO.... **** right off.
This AFL process is a disgrace.
Problem is there are players from other clubs who make contact and are not cited.Why? It's not like players from other clubs don't get pinged for it too, we're hardly being victimised here.
Problem is there are players from other clubs who make contact and are not cited.
It is at the discretion of Christian whether it is deemed accidental or careless and therefore subject to sanctions or not.
His track record does not inspire confidence in his decision making abilities.
Upset because now Ed has multiple fines for umpire contact so his next one will likely be an automatic suspension.And there are players from other clubs who make contact and do get cited. And I bet there are players from our club who have made contact who haven't been cited - but we never hear about that therefore in peoples' minds it never happens.
It's a minor fine, not sure why people are getting upset by it.
Upset because now Ed has multiple fines for umpire contact so his next one will likely be an automatic suspension.
Once again, it matters that Christian has discretion for the decision whether to deem contact was accidental or intentional.
The same discretion was used to allow GAblett to get away with deliberately elbowing opponents in the head, while lesser known players are suspended because of an accidental head clash in a tackle.
Not an issue about not touching the umps. my issue is of all the things referred, there were more serious tagging indiscretions that went unpunished/un referredWhy? It's not like players from other clubs don't get pinged for it too, we're hardly being victimised here.
Nope, its clearly a systematic attempt to penalise Carlton.Why? It's not like players from other clubs don't get pinged for it too, we're hardly being victimised here.
Thanks for your contribution to the discussion.Nope, its clearly a systematic attempt to penalise Carlton.
At stages this board can give the Cult of Hird a fair run for their money with regard to having a more significant persecution complex.
#StandByEdNope, its clearly a systematic attempt to penalise Carlton.
At stages this board can give the Cult of Hird a fair run for their money with regard to having a more significant persecution complex.
Toby Nankervis, Richmond has been charged with Striking Marc Murphy, Carlton, during the first quarter of the Round 21 match between Richmond and Carlton, played at the MCG on Sunday August 11.
In summary he can accept a $3000 sanction with an early plea.
Based on the available evidence, the incident was assessed as Intentional Conduct with Low Impact and Body Contact. The incident was classified as a $5000 sanction as a second offence. The player can accept a $3000 sanction with an early plea.
Match Review Officer's full statement: round 21
The Match Review Officer has released all his findings for R21www.afl.com.au
And this is the issue I have with all of these types of incidents
If it is intentional, suspend them, it will soon be eliminated
Any news on the chicken wing/arm bar wrestling move from Riewoldt?