balmainforever
Dibs
- Sep 4, 2003
- 25,752
- 30,612
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Balmain, GreenBay, Edmonton, Celtic
- Moderator
- #3,502
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
A little bit better at speaking than Shae Boltonnice speech by wines, seems like a good bloke
Cost me squillionsMacrae missing top 20 is crae crae
Crazy difference when your not coked off your headA little bit better at speaking than Shae Bolton
He also had Petracca on 31 votes and 2nd (landed on 23 and 10th), he was 1/2 - 50% for me.Wheres the Bloke who is streaking the Granny because Walsh got 30
NEVER doubt TJM
Everyone had Trac high, TJM was one of the only counts that polled Walsh that highHe also had Petracca on 31 votes and 2nd (landed on 23 and 10th), he was 1/2 - 50% for me.
These were bank man cheers!
Pleasantly surprised by how quiet this thread is atm, I was expecting dozens of 'Wines yeah money' posts within 10 minutes of the count finishing.
Parker and Kelly really hurt. I didn’t expect Ollie to poll that high. I had him sub 30.
Miller top 10 and J Kelly top 20 f’ed a lot of multis
At this stage I'm looking at
McKay without Walsh $2.50 on Lads (going against what I do normally and also going with E.Curnow $2.60 SB for real odds of $1.275 - have high confidence that these guys had the standout vote games, Cripps & Weitering will find it tougher to poll the 6+ needed).
2U on each
2U Merrett most votes Essendon $2.20
Billings most without Steele $10 - got him on 8, best case 9, Dunstan on 7, best case 10...fingers crossed it's not best case for Dunstan.
0.4U Billings @ $10
Anderson without Miller $1.40
O'Meara without Mitchell $1.65
Amon without Boak/Wines $1.20
Martin most votes Richmond $1.15
Parker most votes Sydney $1.50
2U @ $5.15
Small amounts (0.2U) on Fyfe most votes Freo ($21) and Dangerfield most votes Geelong ($17) - I have them 4 and 3 behind their leaders respectively but both have too good a polling history to ignore at those odds. If Mundy and Guthrie only poll 12ish (3 votes under expected) they are both in with a good shot, at the least could tie.
Have Treloar, Smith & Libba all on 6 - Libba has a poor history and I think Smith is the most likely to standout. However, having Treloar on the same votes means I'll take him at $7 too. Libba the most likely to underpoll.
0.5U Smith @ $3
0.3U Treloar @ $7
I also have Taranto 13 Hopper 12 Kelly 11 at GWS, and the odds are with Hopper ($9) and Taranto ($6), but I always find GWS really hard to poll. Kelly looks smooth too so he is a good poller, whereas Taranto is a butcher and Hopper could go the way of a favoured Priddis type attracting votes or ignored in the way of an Oliver.
0.3U Hopper @ $9
0.3U Taranto @ $6
2U Steele WIN @ $9
0.7U Boxed pick 4 Oliver/Steele/Bont/Wines @ $4
1U Oliver WIN @ $4
1U Bont WIN @ $3.75
0.3U Dusty leading after round 5 @ $7.50
2U Oliver to poll in most games @ $2.10
17.2u total outlay
Probably spend a further 13 on 3 vote games when they come out.
Eyeing off:
Billings round 1, Parfitt round 5, O'Meara round 6, Ah Chee round 8 (too many mids sharing the disposals pie), Dunstan round 11, Dusty round 12, Aish round 13, Moore (Haw) round 15, Weightman round 16, S. Taylor round 21, Seedsman round 22
Brandon Ah Chee $3 - v Hawthorn with 17 dis, 4 goals
Cale Hooker $2 - round 3 v St Kilda, lots of comp (Merrett, Parish, Ridley, Smith, Stringer, even Steele - but I'd say 5 goals in modern footy would get a vote >50% of the time, so will think about these odds, maybe if they float out to $2.10-2.20)
Brent Daniels $ 2 - v Essendon, Whitfield BOG, Green should get 2 but Daniels was very good this game and eye catching speed, including the match winner.
Merrett and Parish quiet.
Harry Schoenberg $1.83 - 1 v North in round 23 (Keays/Laird split the 3/2), potentially votes in the 2nd Showdown which was a low scoring, dour affair
Mabior Chol $1.67 is also good value. Weightman too.
Don't think Seedsman should be $5 for round 22. Fritsch kicked some cheap ones late yes, and it'd be easy to give him the 3 but I still think the umps are capable of context and see that Seedsman had a better 4Q effort
It's tight but I'm going against Libba in the Dogs count.
$2.20 for a guy who has polled 8 total votes since 2014. His best year being 2014 with 14 votes, in a bottom 5 side and probably stood out in the eye test.
As good and as important he is to the 2021 Dogs side, there's far more competition for votes this year and he loses the eye test battle.
Sure, he could go the way of a Priddis type in terms of attracting votes, but you've got the obvious standouts in Bont & Macrae, plus I'd say Smith, Treloar, Bruce are obvious standouts to get some decent votes, while Weightman, Dale & Naughton are also eye-catching in ways.
He's $2.20 without Bont/Macrae
I'd say
3 v North round 16 (although I'm on Weightman for value here - eye catching performance, 4 goals and 2 goal assists, was all over North early and don't think Libba dominated to the point of being unable to ignore him)
Maybe 2 or 1 v Carlton round 8. Bont the 3, Bruce could get the 2 for 5 goals. I've gone Bruce.
1 in round 9 v Port.
I don't have him polling round 3 (3. Bruce 2. Treloar 1. Raffle between Macrae, Daniel, Dunkley but Libba after those 3), 6 (3. Macrae, 2. Treloar, 1. Dunkley), 10 (3. Bont 2. Dale 1. Naughton)
5 total for Libba, 3-6 his range. I could genuinely see 2 for the North game and 1 for the Blues game.
Meanwhile I've got Smith 3 round 1 (clear, standout, unable to ignore), 1 v Adelaide round 20 (possibility of 2 ahead of Dale), clear 2 round 15 v West Coast. 6 for Smith, 6-7 being his range.
Treloar 2 in round 3 & 6 (potential 3 in round 6), 1 in 4, 1 in 9. 6 for Treloar, range being 4-6.
Treloar voting history not bad, Smith 7 last year and only going to get more votes - I personally think he's more Dylan Shiel in terms of his bomb it long and hope than Dusty despite the finals goals, but trying to think like the umps.