No they are right. The B/E formula works on an overall price for all players (I think it's something like that) and the fact that so many players went 2-3 times the avg they were priced at, it means B/E's are higher.Surely those BE's are all incorrect.
I think they're all subject to change depending on what everyone else scores as well.
Mitchell was priced at 107, scored 106 and dropped $1k. Seems working about right. Clearly whatever they show as a BE is stuffed though!?!
Edit: I guess Bailey Williams is the bench mark. Priced $600k. Scored 106 and went up $17k.
So worst case williams goes up maybe $20-$25k this week if he has an absolute blinder. Definetely one you can wait on.
I'm more concerned I'll do two dud trades. Atleast if I make one of them Williams I might have 1 dud trade That's my thinking anyway.
Even someone like Gulden. I remember Rowell's B/E (and a heap of other players) was well below Gulden's after rd1 last year as less midpricers and rookies did as well.
This could all change in a week though if cheap players don't do as well.