TheGreatBarryB
Hall of Famer
Huh? All my offensive players have gone down 10% so assume as have most others.Its not as bad as you think. QBs barely changed. Burrow is more a one out of the box than the norm. Brady went up around 8%
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Huh? All my offensive players have gone down 10% so assume as have most others.Its not as bad as you think. QBs barely changed. Burrow is more a one out of the box than the norm. Brady went up around 8%
You do a great job running the comp but you cant just change a comp on your whim. And they’re substantial enough changesDefense isnt dominant at all. The whole thing was about balance when setting up the league and thats still true. Offense is still scoring more than defense. It just needed adjustments here and there, some things out of whack, some were errors fixed, some were algorithms tweaked by 0.01.
Still the same concept and same ranges exist....
200-300 = offense, with the top at each position pushing thru to 350-400.
150-200 = defense, with just a few all-world players pushing that to 250-300.
100-150 = kickers/punters.
What that means is that all the average/meh players across offense and defense reflect each other. Thats where the balance shows. Bring up the page all players together ranked from top to bottom, score wise, and you cant argue that kupp, allen, brady, rodgers, j.taylor, kelce, adams, chase, donald, watt, parsons, heyward, and such names in the top 30 or so fairly accurately reflect their status as elite players that season at their positions, and nothing extremely out of whack score wise. And then scrolling down to the 50 or so range, and seeing average players at QB, WR, LB, etc all fairly accurately reflected ranking wise.
I didnt make defense better than it was. I re-assessed the regularity of NFL stats over the last five years (tackles, passes defensed, hits, tackles for loss, etc) and tweaked algorithms like 0.01 here and there so the IDPs re-balanced between themselves.
The new scoring result is that DEs and ILBs score a little better than they used to, DTs score a little less than they used to...but still that range of 150-200-ish for the above average to top IDPs.
Instead of the top range DTs being 170-250, DEs and ILBS being 120-150, S being 150-200, CBs being 130-160....theyre now 150-200-ish more uniformally.
IDPs who have mvp seasons like donald and watt break thru the ceiling of their peers and score 270-300. Just like Kupp at WR with an mvp season breaks thru the ceiling of his peers (200-300) and scores 397. That still existed before but things arent out of whack like they were previous seasons.
Huh? All my offensive players have gone down 10% so assume as have most others.
Shows how shit your team isNah, majority of mine went up
Shows how shit your team is
Burrow -46Herbert +5
Foreman +9
Aiyuk +17
Godwin =
Moore =
Waddle +12
Engram +4
Everett +3
Hooper =
Jordan =
Schultz +16
Not a single one went down.
How could it effect my team and no one else?So what youre really crying about is that its affected your team, dont lump everyone else in with your little whinge
Burrow -46
Ryan -43
Jefferson -31
Kupp -36
Ertz -16
Gesicki -16
Kelce -25
Moore -11
Davis -10
Yeah for offensive players but defensive haven’t changed. You’ve clearly flipped to more defensive.To put it crudely and incorrectly....400 last year is 350 now. 350 last year is 300 now. 150 last year is 100 now. Scoring may have changed, but the difference between good and bad is still reflected similarly
I think you have it wrong. Take Kupp as he’s a FA. He scored 458 last season so he’s new salary reflects that $9.1m. But he’s now showing 422 points ..so his salary should be $8.4m. GG agrees with me that off scores have gone down.If everyone's totals go down it actually only helps the good teams btw, given their gun players contracts are cheaper and the cap has increased.
I think you have it wrong. Take Kupp as he’s a FA. He scored 458 last season so he’s new salary reflects that $9.1m. But he’s now showing 422 points ..so his salary should be $8.4m. GG agrees with me that off scores have gone down.
Salaries...i explained that before. 2023 FAs and off-contract players will get new salaries based on 2022. Old inflated salaries will be weened off sooner than later in a year or two.I think you have it wrong. Take Kupp as he’s a FA. He scored 458 last season so he’s new salary reflects that $9.1m. But he’s now showing 422 points ..so his salary should be $8.4m. GG agrees with me that off scores have gone down.
Sorry I’ve never been in a comp where changes are made without majority approval …and these aren’t minorI did say a few pages back that I can't remember GG saying he'd change some things this year but apparently he did. So bad luck us I guess.
I do agree that we need to be told in an opening post for the year scoring changes he plans on making , would be easy to find for everyone.
Nah need approval by 12 of 16 owners for changes just like Alpha.Salaries...i explained that before. 2023 FAs and off-contract players will get new salaries based on 2022. Old inflated salaries will be weened off sooner than later in a year or two.
Salary effect long term....theyll go down from what they used to be. Offense down say 200-900k, DE/ILB up say 200k.
Sorry I’ve never been in a comp where changes are made without majority approval …and these aren’t minor
I can’t be farked checking other teams. How can I anyway now scores have changed. Only way I’ve picked it up is because I copy and pasted a while ago into a spreadsheet. I do that every season around auction and have never noticed differences like this.It's a fair point, but he tinkers with them practically every year I think, so it kind of looks funny when you kick up a stink coming off a championship. Makes you look like you're only looking after your own self interests , not anyone elses.
That’s loopholes and problems. This is whole points system and don’t think it’s ever impacted like this.There are tons of rule changes i make every year on the fly as executive decision as commish when even one person points out a flaw, a problem, a loophole, or suggestion. Eg....comp picks, comp pick adjustments, no cap relief for retired/suspended, getting rid of contract year cap (we used to have a cap total on contract years across the entire roster), increasing cap to 100m this season, adding auction bids spent against cap space (never existed), reducing all FA contracts to 1 yr before start of season ...etc etc ...there have been so many changes year to year without votes, just whenever someone has a good idea, a new suggestion, an inprovement, remove a loophole, etc, i enact it on the fly executive decision. This isbt alpha therefore