- Nov 27, 2016
- 18,639
- 36,306
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Where exactly is that on the matrix?Probably based on his long history of good behaviour
On SM-F926B using BigFooty.com mobile app
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Where exactly is that on the matrix?Probably based on his long history of good behaviour
Thanks, didn’t see that.Warner was also fined for the same melee.
And worth every cent of itNah, the blond haired gimp got a fine as well
We’re going to have to start a gofundme page for Stocks, the bugger will finish his career with fk all in the bank the way we love him to play
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
I guess it's either just a catch-all type phrase, or these two were deemed to be the worst offenders and others were involved but didn't really do much.Thanks, didn’t see that.
Even so, a two person melee ?
What a farceWhat I don’t understand is the sanction on Stocker for entering a “melee”.
Yet no swans players were cited.
WTF, was he having a lone “melee”
That's what annoys me. You can't use precedents in defence but this type of stuff is taken into account.It's not, but I think that psst behaviour probably sways the adjudicator from intentional to careless or whatever it is.
Let's be honest.What I don’t understand is the sanction on Stocker for entering a “melee”.
Yet no swans players were cited.
WTF, was he having a lone “melee”
Or Parker... thinking about it... Plow and LOB are also pretty at one man meleesLet's be honest.
If anyone can have a one-man melee, it's probably Stocker
No current season stats available
I’ve tried on quiet a few Saturday nights as a much younger fool!Let's be honest.
If anyone can have a one-man melee, it's probably Stocker
That was significantly less dangerous than Larkey tunnelling YoungChicken wing tackle, straight to the tribunal, 2 weeks only because Freo plead guilty, AFL sights potential to cause injury as justification.
Other players bump at speed, hot players in the head, 1 week.
Hitting players in the head is more dangerous than chicken wing tackles.
Especially in this landscape of concussions and the ramifications it has down the trackChicken wing tackle, straight to the tribunal, 2 weeks only because Freo plead guilty, AFL sights potential to cause injury as justification.
Other players bump at speed, hot players in the head, 1 week.
Hitting players in the head is more dangerous than chicken wing tackles.
They should have made an example of Kennedy. He is an aging warrior who has been pushed out of the only position he can play. Looks like he is frustrated that the game has past him by. Great career but he has gone on a year too long
bileeThanks, didn’t see that.
Even so, a two person melee ?
why do you follow a sport regulated by a corrupt organization?That 1 week Doc decision is exactly why everyone thinks the AFL is corrupt.
They knew before the decision he was out for quite a while so could have at least made a mini statement. Let’s be honest we don’t want that crap in our game and the AFL has supposedly wanted that crap out.
But no if it was a Stocker, a Tom Greene or another “bad boy” no way on a million Sundays would it be a week.
Consistency has d as Keats been the AFLs problem. Fans may not like the decisions but if they are consistent, across the board, then they will accept it.
Yes I think good behaviour in a long career should be rewarded but 1 week was a joke