Trades 2023 Fantasy Round 17 Trades

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Fyfe > Mills
DCam > Keays
1k spare

Tempted to bring in Maric for a dead rookie though.

Still fielding 2 rookies (Sheldrick & MJ) with Wilmot, Chesser, Fletcher and Hewitt on the pine, none of them ready to cash in yet. Reckon I'll need all of them to complete the team so the extra in Maric will be handy in 4 weeks time or so, just a question of him holding his spot.
 
Is Flanders a play?

Didn't watch the game, but I would assume he has a pretty low BE and is cheap(ish).

Seemed to be a lot of hype on him pre season.

Basically make $180k going Hobbs to Flanders at F6. Coming off a 94 and 101.

Would allow me to upgrade Lloyd to Bont or anyone below that price.
 
Last edited:
Warner out meant I had to reverse English to Witts ... I was ropable.
Moved Dawson middle and brought in Duncan instead along with a $200k rookie to bank cash.

So ... this week ....
Witts > English
S.Mitchell > Mills

2 rookies left on field. $200k banked. The end is near ...
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Some interesting role/CBA notes from the weekend

Popular Owns
Keays
3% CBAs (Rachele 50%, Pedlar 42%, Sloane also dropped about 15%)
Cameron 54% CBAs - down about 15% on previous weeks, but might be linked to his extended spell in Q1?
J. Kelly - 6% CBAs - Seems like Kingsley has decided to shunt him back out to a wing again. Shame. Favouring the Green/Cogs/Ward trio with Callaghan pinch hitting
Day - 54% - a bit of a drop but a lot of the Hawks mids go at 50-60%.
Simpkin - 50% - bar injury, a season low. And just a low generally, normally up around the 70-80s. Maybe he's having to take a step back so Will Phil, Tarryn & Wardlaw (all 50%) can keep their time with LDU returning
Windhager - 36% sharing the 3/4th rotation with Sinclair (39%), Gresham (25%) & Ross (25%). Good to get time without a tag job, I guess.
Sheldrick - 41% - similar share to previous weeks.
Daniel - 0% - just kicked out for Bevo reasons
E. Hewett - 57% - a nice bonus but still had his biggest impact forward, not ideal.

Less popular owns/targets/blokes experiencing a bump
McCluggage
59% - up about 30% on previous 6 week's numbers - but wonder how much of that was Q4 with Dunkley off.
Anderson 88% - after two weeks in purgatory, he was the big dog again
Josh Ward - 54% - season high and when not in the CBA, was on a wing. Mainly replaced the bits and pieces time Moore/Mackenzie etc. got and stole about 30% from Day
Mills - 76% - Warner out probably helped
Macrae - 65% - highst fo the year, pretty much got the CBAs that one of Daniel/Smith often get and then Treloar/Libba drppped from 85% to 70%
Shuey - 71% - season hgih by some distance, and looked v good in there. I presume spike linked to no Yeo/Kelly and needing some zip in there to compliment the plodders
Petruccelle - 54% - out of nowhere. But still shit.

----

I think looking at that, Mills consolidates himself as a target based on the role being there, Shuey (esp because he played so well) can become one for the very risk tolerant, Noah Anderson might be a slightly safer premo to punt on now, McCluggage is there with the soft matchup and season best game, Josh Ward probably isn't value compared to what's at a similar price, but his style is so fantasy friendly that in the role, he could be a serious scorer.

I'd be pretty eager to avoid Simpkin now - was a 90-100 guy with the heavy CBA role. Any hope of being relevant and pushing past 100 required it to remain. Josh Kelly now an avoid as well - has always been solid in the wing role, but the prospect of a CBA role was what made him juicy.

I wouldn't be losing the faith on Day but could be a handy luxury trade if nothign else requires fixing. Hawks scoring can be tacky with results, and he got thrown around a bit. I still think he's 95 from here.

Darcy Cam is the tough one off a bad score, if he's only going at 50-55% CBAs, he's probably only an 85-95 at best guy, needed the 60-65% to push the 95-100 we wanted. But think it's more about his Q1 missed time.

Keays is the interesting one. 29 touches, 5 marks, 7 tackles, 14 contested possessions, 3 clearances, 2 goals 2 is a beautiful stat line. But in the non-CBA role of rounds 1-10, his best score was 95 and that was round one, between R2-10, he didn't go above 85. So it's great that he's dominated in the role that historically was really poor for his scoring, but is that repeatable? Surely very unlikely. So I guess the question is - did he vacate the mids to give Rachele/Pedlar a real go given it was a soft matchup vs North and there wasn't a tag target (but then again, he wasn't moved on to LDU when he took the game over in Q2)? Or have things changed back, again? If we decide it's the latter, I'd almost be considering a preventative trade-out (and only keeping him given the BE if you're able to get a M9/F7 loophole score that makes it worthwhile to bench him and see. I understand that he was pushing up into the contest, but that he was the one to vacate the CBAs and perform that role doesn't fill me with confidence. Especially as you don't always send an extra up to stoppages.
 
It’s Humphery > Maric
Wardlaw > Mills

Or

Humphery > Maric
Day > Doc

Thoughts? Could wait one more week on Day and go to Sic
A bit of caution with Maric is that he was emergency before eagles has 2 late outs. On the back of that game he could hold his spot but you never know.
 
I have another trade idea which is quite different to my first one, I guess you could call it the “safer” option

Short to any mid up to $985k
Jackson to Berg

I think Berg has played enough games in defence now that he should stay there.

As for the mid upgrade, I’m thinking Parish…. But I’m nervous with him pinging his calf again, but he’s looked good and he’s less likely to cop a tag compared to Zerrett
 
A bit of caution with Maric is that he was emergency before eagles has 2 late outs. On the back of that game he could hold his spot but you never know.
Binns (c'mon Carlton, season is over) should be in this week. Tsatas for Ess eventually. Mid/ball winner types are definitely a better option but Maric has some money to make.
As for the mid upgrade, I’m thinking Parish…. But I’m nervous with him pinging his calf again, but he’s looked good and he’s less likely to cop a tag compared to Zerrett
I considered Parish for Warner but Briggs B.E means he won't bridge much more of the gap to English so I've gotta go there this week as I want to get Sicily next week for either D.Cam (via DPP) or Day.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

1688354701837.png

Daniel > Doc is locked in (Bevo'd and high BE). Also, Ashcroft should be ok one more week given playing against the Eagles.

The following trade scenarios :
  1. Sheldrick does well. Briggs > English. Then Ashcroft/Mitchell > Bont/Mills next week,
  2. Sheldrick does poorly. Mitchell > Bont. Shifting Cogs back into the midfield. Briggs/Ashcroft > English/Mills next week.
 
View attachment 1728085

Daniel > Doc is locked in (Bevo'd and high BE). Also, Ashcroft should be ok one more week given playing against the Eagles.

The following trade scenarios :
  1. Sheldrick does well. Briggs > English. Then Ashcroft/Mitchell > Bont/Mills next week,
  2. Sheldrick does poorly. Mitchell > Bont. Shifting Cogs back into the midfield. Briggs/Ashcroft > English/Mills next week.
Game for Ashcroft is another one at the Gabbatoir, so am on the same page and holding another week.

Would like to know from anyone who watched, what was the eye test for Cuningham (61pts 1st half - 13pts the 2nd). It was Hawthorn though - Freo over there is a different proposition. Very affordable bench cover.
 
Last edited:
Binns (c'mon Carlton, season is over) should be in this week. Tsatas for Ess eventually. Mid/ball winner types are definitely a better option but Maric has some money to make.

I considered Parish for Warner but Briggs B.E means he won't bridge much more of the gap to English so I've gotta go there this week as I want to get Sicily next week for either D.Cam (via DPP) or Day.
Had a look at the English history against Collingwood and it's not good - through for the most part it was against Grundy when in stellar form - that said he struggled a bit around the ground back in those days. Hasn't played the Pies in quite a while. With his BE of 125 (which might be a problem for him), even he can wait a week I'm starting to think. What's your thoughts?
 
Last edited:
Game for Ashcroft is another one at the Gabbatoir, so am on the same page and holding another week.

Would like to know from anyone who watched, what was the eye test for Cuningham (61pts 1st half - 13pts the 2nd). It was Hawthorn though - Freo over there is a different proposition.
He's one that I'm looking at so would be interested to hear comments too, I understand that he's best 22 and should play every game until he's injured again.
 
He's one that I'm looking at so would be interested to hear comments too, I understand that he's best 22 and should play every game until he's injured again.
Yeah, have heard he is rated highly, and just struggled to stay on the park. Is also playing for a RFA contract now.....
 
Is Flanders a play?

Didn't watch the game, but I would assume he has a pretty low BE and is cheap(ish).

Seemed to be a lot of hype on him pre season.

Basically make $180k going Hobbs to Flanders at F6. Coming off a 94 and 101.

Would allow me to upgrade Lloyd to Bont or anyone below that price.
Two factors for Flanders - Touk & Dew
 
Had a look at the English history against Collingwood and it's not good - through for the most part it was against Grundy when in stellar form - that said he stuggled a bit around the ground back in this days. Hasn't play the Pies in quite a while. With his BE of 125 (which might be a problem for him), even he could wait a week I'm starting to think. What's your thoughts?
I could get Nank to English next week through a rookie downgrade as a first trade. I’m happy to wait a week
 
Had a look at the English history against Collingwood and it's not good - through for the most part it was against Grundy when in stellar form - that said he stuggled a bit around the ground back in this days. Hasn't play the Pies in quite a while. With his BE of 125 (which might be a problem for him), even he could wait a week I'm starting to think. What's your thoughts?
Saw the B.E for English, he's gone over that in a third of his games and can go 150, but Briggs 95 B.E is the kicker. If he didn't show that floor on the weekend I'd use my trades elsewhere. I'm sure he'll score more that 50-60 but not much more than 95.
Even going 105 sees a minimal $7.4k increase and I'm set on Sicily next week so it's be Rd 19 for English if not this week.

Ideally either Briggs or D-Cameron go for me this week.
 
AF.JPG
So far ins for this week look like Lloyd > HH, and Day > Sinclair.
Leaves me 270k to take into next week to do Hobbs & Ashcroft > Mills & Oliver/Bont.
Walsh's decline is worrying me, and has me thinking whether I hold Day, and turn Walsh into Sinc (via dpp) instead. But considering he's done the majority of his bleeding already, he might just be a hold for now and hope he improves.
Any suggestions welcome!
 
View attachment 1728136
So far ins for this week look like Lloyd > HH, and Day > Sinclair.
Leaves me 270k to take into next week to do Hobbs & Ashcroft > Mills & Oliver/Bont.
Walsh's decline is worrying me, and has me thinking whether I hold Day, and turn Walsh into Sinc (via dpp) instead. But considering he's done the majority of his bleeding already, he might just be a hold for now and hope he improves.
Any suggestions welcome!
I bailed on Walsh in R15 and brought in Trac and have been rewarded with a couple of tons. Something isn’t quite right with Walsh at the moment, definitely had a better first half yesterday but came to a halt in the 2nd
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top