
boncer34
Formerly "Dos23"








All 6 of South Africa's?Not so sure about that. All 6 of their top batters can and were likely to fire whereas India know they will likely only have 1 or 2 Australian batsmen perform.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All 6 of South Africa's?Not so sure about that. All 6 of their top batters can and were likely to fire whereas India know they will likely only have 1 or 2 Australian batsmen perform.
It's been happening all tournament. Makes no sense when he's often been out most economical. Can't bowl at the death? Fine get him another over with his opening spell and another during the middle oversHazlewood not bowling 10 overs was criminal.
Both teams start with nothing on Sunday, that's all that matters now.
Haha.Which one?![]()
Yeah I assumed he would come back on last night. If not, he should have just bowled out in that second spell. He is bowling beautifully at the momentIt's been happening all tournament. Makes no sense when he's often been out most economical. Can't bowl at the death? Fine get him another over with his opening spell and another during the middle overs
Hazlewood not bowling 10 overs was criminal.
It is difficult to make predictions, especially about the future.We'll know more after both teams bat
He's not the closer but I would have thought he'd get Zampa's last two.has there been an explanation for this? Cummins was expensive in comparison but almost got his 10. Maybe to ensure the saffas get some more runs to make a contest for ratings?
It is difficult to make predictions, especially about the future.
Who gives a shitI just don't think it should have taken 48 overs to score 212
No different to scoring it in 28 though. Same result.I just don't think it should have taken 48 overs to score 212
This board seemed to give a shit when Australia were struggling to get to 200 at the start of the WCWho gives a s**t
Agree, I'm going at effectiveness and intent. Was it worth taking it that deep with only 3 wickets in handNo different to scoring it in 28 though. Same result.
I think they already knewWe've shown our hand against spin. Expect a raging turner for final!
Yes because it got them the win. How is winning it in 28 overs worth anymore?This board seemed to give a s**t when Australia were struggling to get to 200 at the start of the WC
Agree, I'm going at effectiveness and intent. Was it worth taking it that deep with only 3 wickets in hand
This was tailor made for Smith and Marnus and they disappointedHead scored so fast it allowed us to poke and prod to a win, a slow start on this deck would have made that impossible he basically won game before our middle order tried their best to lose it.
Time to swap my South Africa shirt for an India shirt, hopefully we can get some revenge for the 2003 WC final.
I've got faith in RohitSharma, King Kohli and the rest of our guys that we can knock off you Aussies in the final.
You guys nearly did a south africa, glad you got through to make the casual fans somewhat interested in the buildup to the match. India deservedly heavy favs.
The last time we won a World Cup final (2021) most of the discussion on this board in the immediate aftermath was who should replace Starc in the side. I wouldn't count on it.Can we enjoy the win before the negativity comes out?