Is anyone aware of where you might find a replay of the game? Thanks
Not in India , but try Pakistan
I get feeling that there might be a North Korea style edit of the game floating around showing that India actually won the game.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is anyone aware of where you might find a replay of the game? Thanks
Not in India , but try Pakistan
It was 5 overthrows. They ran one AFTER the ball was thrown which should never have counted. They didn't even make it to a super-over without the umpires cheating.
19.8 Overthrow or wilful act of fielder
If the boundary results from an overthrow or from the wilful act of a fielder, the runs scored shall be
any runs for penalties awarded to either side
and the allowance for the boundary
and the runs completed by the batters, together with the run in progress if they had
already crossed at the instant of the throw or act.
Like the soccer match lolI get feeling that there might be a North Korea style edit of the game floating around showing that India actually won the game.
Zaheer's last 3-4 years were the equal of an awful lot of quality bowlers to be called a good honest left armer. A fair bit sharper too than most lefties.Again their bowling attacks haven’t been. It’s really not very difficult.
Unless you count Srinath you who was gone by the end of the decade, Their three best bowlers from 1995-2010 were Harbhajan, Zaheer and Kumble. Kumble was a champion. Harbhajan was a champion when absolutely everything was in his favour but nothing more, and Zaheer was nothing more than a good honest left armer.
The fact is that in the last decade they have addressed that and started to produce attacks that whether you would consider them to be filled with champions or not, they play and function as good attacks should and it’s allowed them to start competing and winning in countries they didn’t previously.
They’re unbeaten in their last four series in Australia and England and blew it in SA when Rabada and Jansen f***ed them.
Then 5 ,7,….Surprised that Rohit didn't come out and say the the final should have been been best out of of 3 games
If you've got an AFL club membership, some clubs (dunno if Hawthorn's one of them) provide free Kayo to go with your membership. There's full match replays on there.Is anyone aware of where you might find a replay of the game? Thanks
Zaheer's last 3-4 years were the equal of an awful lot of quality bowlers to be called a good honest left armer. A fair bit sharper too than most lefties.
Mate please correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't the Indian batsmen score just 5 boundaries after the 10th over of the innings? If that's true, then I reckon the Aussie bowlers deserve a bit more credit than you're prepared to give them. And Cummins' tactic to give the bowlers 1 over spells was a masterstroke. It gave the batsmen no chance to get used to the bowling.Yeah a real rags to riches underdog story with plucky Australia winning another World Cup, a country that had already won five of them.
Even though I enjoyed seeing Australia lose their first 2 games against India and South Africa I never wrote them off, only a fool would.
Australia have started badly in World Cups before like 1999 but they usually they get their act together and feature at the pointy end.
The 1992 World Cup was one exception where they started badly and didn't even make the semi finals, they usually make a semi at least.
It's not that dumb, I was referring to Gill and Rohit throwing their wickets away to not great balls, that was more dumb batting from them.
Cummins bowled a couple of great balls to dismiss Shreyas Iyer and Kohli which also helped to take the heat off the rest of your bowlers.
I don't think the rest of your bowlers bowled that well tbh, they benefitted from India throwing away two wickets and Cummins two wickets.
India lost too many wickets to take on your lesser bowlers like Maxwell, Head, Marsh and Starc and give them the treatment they deserved.
.
Surprised that Rohit didn't come out and say the the final should have been been best out of of 3 games
Could be coloured by the fact that I liked the bloke. Anyone who worked out a way to take wickets on the shit he had to bowl on as a pacer for as long as he did is alright in my book.His best was very good, totally agree - he developed really good control and swung it both ways and conventional and reverse as well. And he got a good few years out of it. As a career appraisal though I couldn’t rate him better than ‘decent’
Could be coloured by the fact that I liked the bloke. Anyone who worked out a way to take wickets on the s**t he had to bowl on as a pacer for as long as he did is alright in my book.
ExactlyThey ran 1 completed run off the bat, and when in the process of completing the second run, the throw at the stumps hit Stokes bat and then ricocheted to the fence. The issue was, Stokes and Rashid had yet to cross for the second run when the throw was released.
The rule:
The issue was that when Gutpills throw was released, while Stokes and Rashid had started on the second run, they had yet to cross each other, so the 'run in progress' should not have counted.
Boundaries Law | MCC
Can't remember whether I saw it here or somewhere else. So can't help you.
Do they not allow fans around airports or do you guys just not care lol
Not sure why so many people take what the toss losing captain says so seriously. It's a very easy way to play some early mind gamesTBH I think Sharma saying he would bat first was a bit of bravado. Chasing in Ahmededab under lights seems a slightly easier task.