Blaming stoppages on continuity in ruck , they had worked on it , but has been ordinary
Sorta fair. Ladhams played a few games in a row but mids have been the same mainly
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Blaming stoppages on continuity in ruck , they had worked on it , but has been ordinary
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Given the flexibility of Francis, and Fox being able to play small, I'll allow it.Amartey as sub
If Fox plays on a small/medium type, we're effectively down a tall. If we lose a small, we go back to our usual structure.odd pick
If Fox plays on a small/medium type, we're effectively down a tall. If we lose a small, we go back to our usual structure.
Yeah I usually hate the idea. It suggests we think Amartey can't play a full game (maybe even Hickey), maybe Rampe is a risk. But structure-wise, we have the 3 KPDs as usual and the 2 KPFs (1 less than usual), or if we play Francis fwd, and lose a small, he goes back, Fox or Rampe go on a smaller type. At worst, we're with our usual setup.Prefer someone who can impact in a short time frame , but who knows.
Now that it’s 4 bench and a sub (instead of 3 a few years ago), I am not convinced the sub has as much impact as they did then.Prefer someone who can impact in a short time frame , but who knows.
Coming back from a major hammy it seems a strange decision - but what the hell do I know from my lounge.
Coming back from a major hammy it seems a strange decision - but what the hell do I know from my lounge.
Fancy pants, can afford to have a 'lounge'
So that's what a modular lounge isThe mods all sit on the lounge