Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The market for picks around this mark has been set at a high future 1st, by North.
It would be incredibly generous of clubs to give one away for less.
Impossible not to with that many picks.We cleaned up big time
I’m a Davis and Clarke fan.Who is everyone rating as next 3-5 best talents?
Speculation on WCE board is that Richmond need a ruck (Dodson) and Bulldogs would take Moraes?
The more I read on Moraes the more I feel he would be perfect fit for West Coast but alot of people are calling for Shannahan as he's too good to pass?
The market for picks around this mark has been set at a high future 1st, by North.
It would be incredibly generous of clubs to give one away for less.
Not sure how keen the Dogs would be on future picks.Well we have 2 x low F2’s and 2 x F3’s
Can’t see Richmond and Dogs going tall.
1 of the Dogs picks seems likely.
If Jack lasts a few more picks I’d think the Richmond F2 will be ontraded.
None of this is true. Most of our first round picks for the last two decades have been in the teens and a lot of them outside the first 16/18 picks. The hit and miss rate is entirely in line with the picks around them.It is beyond pathetic how we draft with our first rounders, it having been a problem for years now and it seems to be getting worse. We always reach for players and often draft for positions that are not particularly urgent.
I think you are overblowing the Stocker deal.Let’s just hope he goes better than the Liam Stocker disaster one that Carlton did. These f1 trades are fraught with danger
I'd be shocked if richmond took this pick. I doubt we will bring in another tall forward because we already took 2. And a ruck doesn't seem worth it compared to the following 2 options:Who is everyone rating as next 3-5 best talents?
Speculation on WCE board is that Richmond need a ruck (Dodson) and Bulldogs would take Moraes?
The more I read on Moraes the more I feel he would be perfect fit for West Coast but alot of people are calling for Shannahan as he's too good to pass?
It’s disgraceful. It’s done now and I should probably move on but ****!Ok I’ve slept on it.
Yep, that North trade is indisputably the dumbest since live trading was introduced, and more broadly, one of the worst individual trades made.
I mean, even if North did better than expected next year, and Whitlock turned in to a star, it’d still be utter foolishness because it relies on luck.
No, there was a 2nd rounder attached. And as we've seen that can be as high as pick 28.Well not exactly.
There was what amounts to be a end of R1 pick attached to it.
Is anyone attaching a F1 to a club putting that up from this point? No.
Anyone offering a F1 at this point will likely want change imo.
Maybe a Port or Geelong etc. Essendon won’t offer their F1 straight up.
Richmond’s F2 straight up will be very enticing deal for the Dogs etc if Jack lasts 3-4 more picks
It's a bit of a Catch 22 for bottom teams, though.Ok I’ve slept on it.
Yep, that North trade is indisputably the dumbest since live trading was introduced, and more broadly, one of the worst individual trades made.
I mean, even if North did better than expected next year, and Whitlock turned in to a star, it’d still be utter foolishness because it relies on luck.
It's a bit of a Catch 22 for bottom teams, though.
If you just keep playing it safe and doing the predictable thing, you're criticised for not being brave and bold and trying something different.
If you DO break the mould by taking a Big Risk/Big Reward gamble, then you're crazy and stupid and should have just played it safe.
It's an eye-opener of a trade, that's for sure. But at least North are trying something different to break out of their funk.
But there’s being stupidity too, and IMO North were stupid. They could have waited 1/2 dozen picks and selected a slightly different player without compromising a future 1st.
And if Matt turns out to be A grade?
Picks are just numbers get the players in you rate period
It's a bit of a Catch 22 for bottom teams, though.
If you just keep playing it safe and doing the predictable thing, you're criticised for not being brave and bold and trying something different.
If you DO break the mould by taking a Big Risk/Big Reward gamble, then you're crazy and stupid and should have just played it safe.
It's an eye-opener of a trade, that's for sure. But at least North are trying something different to break out of their funk.
North got 27 (late 1st) in a deep draft and get back Richmond’s F2 next year which will in all likelihood be 1st pick in the second round. Those 2 picks effectively cancel out. So in effect they have used their future 1st to take Whitlock.Of course hindsight will be the best judge.
history tells you it’s a very big risk. They have given up a pick between 3 - 12 for 27 and a pick next year that will be about 28 - 31 given how compromised next year is.
That’s well below the standard average for a trade of that sort and will look jarring if the Roos don’t have a great year next year.
It will be the difference between Matt Whitlock and whomever will be available at their F1 that defines the success of the trade. Richmond’s f2 will always just feel like the steak knives
North got 27 (late 1st) in a deep draft and get back Richmond’s F2 next year which will in all likelihood be 1st pick in the second round. Those 2 picks effectively cancel out. So in effect they have used their future 1st to take Whitlock.
It really comes down to talent evaluation, if they think he’s worth their F1 then fair enough history will be the judge. Most of us have no real idea of what tall options would be available to them next year anyway.
Of course hindsight will be the best judge.
history tells you it’s a very big risk. They have given up a pick between 3 - 12 for 27 and a pick next year that will be about 28 - 31 given how compromised next year is.
That’s well below the standard average for a trade of that sort and will look jarring if the Roos don’t have a great year next year.
It will be the difference between Matt Whitlock and whomever will be available at their F1 that defines the success of the trade. Richmond’s f2 will always just feel like the steak knives
Moraes would be my preference, but I feel like we might just miss out on him.Who is everyone rating as next 3-5 best talents?
Speculation on WCE board is that Richmond need a ruck (Dodson) and Bulldogs would take Moraes?
The more I read on Moraes the more I feel he would be perfect fit for West Coast but alot of people are calling for Shannahan as he's too good to pass?
Too many people looking at just the number of the draft choice. If North rate this kid as a top 10 pick, it makes perfect sense to do this trade. The optics don’t look good because people will look at the draft number.
Of course hindsight will be the best judge.
history tells you it’s a very big risk. They have given up a pick between 3 - 12 for 27 and a pick next year that will be about 28 - 31 given how compromised next year is.
That’s well below the standard average for a trade of that sort and will look jarring if the Roos don’t have a great year next year.
It will be the difference between Matt Whitlock and whomever will be available at their F1 that defines the success of the trade. Richmond’s f2 will always just feel like the steak knives
its the risk you have to take when your draft strategy is a mess
It was so predictable, yet you refused to acknowledge it
Nth made their bed, now they have to sleep in it
Their strategy was fine take the best talent at 2, on no planet was any KPP worth pick 2. Traded in for a sliding key position did they pay overs maybe but it’s hardly a shocking trade