AFL 2024 - AFL ROUND 5

Remove this Banner Ad

Gold Coast v Hawthorn
Gold Coast 1-39
Dylan Moore To Kick 2+ Goals
Jack Ginnivan To Kick 2+ Goals
Malcolm Rosas To Kick 2+ Goals
Ben King To Kick 2+ Goals
Un 162.5 Total Match Points Over/under
Matt Rowell To Get 20+ Disposals

1u $288.97 PB
 
I think O Henry is great value on Lads. $3.15 for 3 and $7 for 4 playing North with Hawkins looking like he will get a rest.

Is around $2 for 3 and $3.50 for 4 on tab/365 atm

Great pick up on this, I put $20 on 4+ at $7, it’s currently into $3.45 in line with other books.
 
Gold Coast v Hawthorn
Gold Coast 1-39
Dylan Moore To Kick 2+ Goals
Jack Ginnivan To Kick 2+ Goals
Malcolm Rosas To Kick 2+ Goals
Ben King To Kick 2+ Goals
Un 162.5 Total Match Points Over/under
Matt Rowell To Get 20+ Disposals

1u $288.97 PB

Tailed this and added Newcombe 20+, at slightly worse odds of $259.89.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Tailed the Lohman and Emmett trains.

Lohmann has looked extremely lively so better than even money is a gift to cover the bets
2.5u AGS $2.10
1u 2+ $7.25
1u 3+ $26

Emmett same odds but only 1u on 2+ and .5u on 3+

.25u on 3+ each @ $667

While it pains me to say it, I dont mind Ben Keays against Carlton. Plays a negating role on Saad and works hard back the other way for a few joe the goose goals. 6 goals in his last two games against the blues. It wont be a big play as I dont fully trust Adelaide (or his footskills) to move the ball quick enough to exploit Saads defensive work but at $5 for 2+ and $15 for 3+ its worth a small nibble. EDIT: @PB
 
Last edited:
Kai Lohmann To Kick 3+ Goals
Dylan Moore To Kick 2 Goals
Tom Emmett To Kick 3+ Goals
Maurice Rioli To Kick 2+ Goals

0.2u @ $6890.94 PB
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

switta and freddy out, should see jackson and banfield forward more. pretty consistent scorers so will take them both at 2+ @16.75 PB
 
Tom Green Goals. It didnt come through last week but the odds have gone slightly up this week for anytime goalscorer. I dont think the ground dimensions suited his long kicking at the ground at Adelaide Hills (Mount Barker) with a more longer field last week. Feel like that ground suited more the traditional forward and smaller forwards.

Tom Green 1+ Goal @ $3.50
Tom Green 2+ Goals @ $21
Tom Green 3+ Goals @ 85.05
 
don't check the dimensions of Manuka Oval then
A slightly wider ground like Manuka , means the midfielders are in-play for goals. Manuka is 162 m v 138 m, Adelaide Hills ground is 160 m v 132 m.

And there was this weird wind direction in Adelaide Hills matches last week, in Swans v Eagles it keep swirling around favouring one side than the other. Not sure as I have never been to SA /Adelaide/Mt Barker before.

Manuka usually alot more faster track. Been there to the cricket a few times.
 
A slightly wider ground like Manuka , means the midfielders are in-play for goals. Manuka is 162 m v 138 m, Adelaide Hills ground is 160 m v 132 m.
Maybe you are right, every link I looked at had the ground 160x141
either way I don't think this has any affect on Tom Green
 
Maybe you are right, every link I looked at had the ground 160x141
either way I don't think this has any affect on Tom Green
I dont reckon the Saints played that well against Richmond on the weekend.

Leaning towards Giants 1-39 pts winning margin.

IMG_3462.jpeg

And can understand the price if you see the heat map of Green in last years final against Saints. I can see alot of punters not interested.





Bet probably has a better chance if Giants get a few more stoppages in the forward 50, as Kingsley is fairly settled with his forward line of: Greene, Hogan, Riccardi and Brown.

Watching the Giants , from observations in term of kicking the ball effectively over long distances, dare I say the pecking order is: Josh Kelly> Coniglio > Tom Green? From that perspective I guess I can understand why the odds are shorter for the first listed couple to score goals.
 
Watching the Giants , from observations in term of kicking the ball effectively over long distances, dare I say the pecking order is: Josh Kelly> Coniglio > Tom Green? From that perspective I guess I can understand why the odds are shorter for the first listed couple to score goals.
The odds are shorter because they simply kick more goals
 

Remove this Banner Ad

AFL 2024 - AFL ROUND 5

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top