balmainforever
Dibs
- Sep 4, 2003
- 25,863
- 30,785
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Balmain, GreenBay, Edmonton, Celtic
- Moderator
- #1
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No current season stats available
I think O Henry is great value on Lads. $3.15 for 3 and $7 for 4 playing North with Hawkins looking like he will get a rest.
Is around $2 for 3 and $3.50 for 4 on tab/365 atm
Gold Coast v Hawthorn
Gold Coast 1-39
Dylan Moore To Kick 2+ Goals
Jack Ginnivan To Kick 2+ Goals
Malcolm Rosas To Kick 2+ Goals
Ben King To Kick 2+ Goals
Un 162.5 Total Match Points Over/under
Matt Rowell To Get 20+ Disposals
1u $288.97 PB
Pickett 2
Gresham 2
Greene 3
McKay 3
Rosas 2
Jezza 3
@70
Oh ****pickett suspended?
Oh *
Yeah deserves a week minimumthey are appealing but i doubt he gets off, done that s**t all the time the jumping bumps
No current season stats available
Imagine this hits had to chuck a tenner on itKai Lohmann To Kick 3+ Goals
Dylan Moore To Kick 2 Goals
Tom Emmett To Kick 3+ Goals
Maurice Rioli To Kick 2+ Goals
0.2u @ $6890.94 PB
Tailed 2+ eaKai Lohmann To Kick 3+ Goals
Dylan Moore To Kick 2 Goals
Tom Emmett To Kick 3+ Goals
Maurice Rioli To Kick 2+ Goals
0.2u @ $6890.94 PB
Kai Lohmann To Kick 3+ Goals
Dylan Moore To Kick 2 Goals
Tom Emmett To Kick 3+ Goals
Maurice Rioli To Kick 2+ Goals
0.2u @ $6890.94 PB
don't check the dimensions of Manuka Oval then
A slightly wider ground like Manuka , means the midfielders are in-play for goals. Manuka is 162 m v 138 m, Adelaide Hills ground is 160 m v 132 m.don't check the dimensions of Manuka Oval then
Maybe you are right, every link I looked at had the ground 160x141A slightly wider ground like Manuka , means the midfielders are in-play for goals. Manuka is 162 m v 138 m, Adelaide Hills ground is 160 m v 132 m.
I dont reckon the Saints played that well against Richmond on the weekend.Maybe you are right, every link I looked at had the ground 160x141
either way I don't think this has any affect on Tom Green
The odds are shorter because they simply kick more goalsWatching the Giants , from observations in term of kicking the ball effectively over long distances, dare I say the pecking order is: Josh Kelly> Coniglio > Tom Green? From that perspective I guess I can understand why the odds are shorter for the first listed couple to score goals.