Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Reading between the lines, you have a time machine?Brisbane by 26 at half time, Freo 35 at full time. Call it a feeling.
For me it’s the personnel. No wingers is going to disrupt any game plan. Young may have to play defence rather than midfield.No confidence in this game at all. Our opponents have already a tough game under their belt and we come in cold
I am also worried about JLos game plan. Has he made the necessary changes? Not from what we have seen in the pre-season it seems,
I can’t see us scoring the minimum 61 points to make this a realityBrisbane by 26 at half time, Freo 35 at full time. Call it a feeling.
And a Sports AlmanacReading between the lines, you have a time machine?
Sure you can, 9 goals 3 to Jye, 4 behinds to everyone else.I can’t see us scoring the minimum 61 points to make this a reality
Maybe, we'll know after the weekend whether it helped.I don’t think the AFL realise how much of an advantage teams that played Opening Round get when they play a team that haven’t played anything but scratchies for the entire preseason. Brisbane essentially get a free game to dust off the cobwebs and iron out deficiencies in their game early - unfortunately it’s hard to see a way we win this one.
Hopefully we put up a fight and make it close, I think Youngy will get votes.
Who takes Darcy spot,
Not even we know! The sentiment is that neither backup is good enough, so we'll play Jackson as a solo ruck and bring in an extra forward. There's also a small chance we play McDonald and send Cox forward.This question also puzzles us outsiders., Obviously Jackson can step up, but will you play two rucks? If so, who else?
And with it being a Sunday game, and extended benches named, we won't know today either.Not even we know! The sentiment is that neither backup is good enough, so we'll play Jackson as a solo ruck and bring in an extra forward. There's also a small chance we play McDonald and send Cox forward.
Reading the tea leaves it looks like Taberner may be the one selected. But really, no one has a clue.
Can you loan us back Lloyd Meek for a couple of games?
I still hope they'd consider McDonald alongside Voss and Tabs for that third tall. He is a much more versatile swingman that can play at both ends and ruck a bit, he's shown as much as the other two in the preseason, and he'd be cover for Cox if Cox can't get through a whole game in his comebackJL with Rhino in an interview yesterday said they want to keep the structure of 2 Rucks and 3 key forwards, so they will either go with Reidy main ruck and Jack backup, or Jacko main ruck and Treacy back up. (with another key forward filling in for Treacy).
So selection will come down to Reidy, or Tabs/Voss as 3rd tall.
I know it won't happen, but the thought of including OMac and allowing Cox to play a third tall role up front is really intriguing.I still hope they'd consider McDonald alongside Voss and Tabs for that third tall. He is a much more versatile swingman that can play at both ends and ruck a bit, he's shown as much as the other two in the preseason, and he'd be cover for Cox if Cox can't get through a whole game in his comeback
Agreed on all counts. It's a bummer we didn't get to try it out in the preseason games with the Cox injuryI know it won't happen, but the thought of including OMac and allowing Cox to play a third tall role up front is really intriguing.
Cox just has that latent unpredictability in him that he could somehow snag 4-5 goals and be a matchwinner.
I hope the concept of him being a legit swingman is not totally discounted by JL.
Has there been a side more casual in their attitude towards wingers and their retention or recruitment? I'm at the point where I can't agree that our game plan has significant dependency on wingers.For me it’s the personnel. No wingers is going to disrupt any game plan.