Norf would have to have a pretty abrupt about face to walk away from their own offer.
-
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
List Mgmt. 2024 Draft - Post Trade Period Edition
- Thread starter _RT_
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Aug 13, 2017
- 5,916
- 20,645
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Draper is dynamite , want him at 2 , his burst out of stoppages and run and carry is what we need desperately, don't know why we aren't into him
He won't go past the crows pick at 4 imo.
tigerdan
Norm Smith Medallist
It is North that are trying to deal themselves into the 1st round. The only logical sellers are us and GWS.
By all means North can deal with GWS and take pick 2 and 15 to the draft. If they think that's better than 6 and 11 then by all means they can do it. We can always deal with Essendon if we want to trade into next year.
Worst case for us we don't deal with them and have to choose from (presumably) Langford or Smilie at 6.
The mooted veto from the North board is hot air. They have few options and no capital.
2 and 15
6 and 11 (or maybe 10 if we are generous)
Sit tight and take pick 2.
Which one are you doing?
Last edited:
Tiger_Of_Old
THE_GUN:"Why don't you use your reg acc"7/9/24
I reckon Pick 11 will be the pick 13 of draft night.
Not sure how you feel Mate but I think Rawlings has put your team in a horrible position. Pick 2 is great, but next pick is 62!!! In a deep and even draft. With a big need for talls, in a draft that has a few decent ones.
Yep, can trade F1 for sure, but every club is invested in this years draft and will be very reluctant to trade a first rounder for that F1. A few clubs have already traded out of next year, hello Blues Hawks and Dees, to get into this years first round so I don’t think you’ll get a better return than what Richmond are supposedly considering for it.
Hopefully, both clubs can work it out as it will benefit both our clubs if something can be agreed upon. But I have to say, the tigers hold the whip hand at this point, trying to look at the situation objectively
Last edited:
- Mar 1, 2010
- 24,359
- 17,762
- AFL Club
- Richmond
6 and 10 is lunacy of Jack Bowes region., 6 and 11 only slightly better.
One is really talking of 6 and 24
TigersRoar
Debutant
- Sep 27, 2020
- 59
- 280
- AFL Club
- Richmond
6 + 11 for 2 and a most likely future top 5 pick is a good deal for us surely. They say next year is not as strong but you’d imagine of the top 5/6 players next year… they’re gonna be good.
I want lalor, and we get a choice of any of the next best (fos for me)
Hotton at 10 for a pacey mid/forward
We can get shanahan later, possibly a trainor, maybe a hannaford who knows.
Essendon will be asking every club after the kako bid to try and trade in, hopefully no one bites until our pick 23/24.
We get these guys in, and if one of 23 or 24 are traded into next year that’s 7 first round picks instead of 8 but who we rate the 2 best in one of those drafts. No brainer for me
I want lalor, and we get a choice of any of the next best (fos for me)
Hotton at 10 for a pacey mid/forward
We can get shanahan later, possibly a trainor, maybe a hannaford who knows.
Essendon will be asking every club after the kako bid to try and trade in, hopefully no one bites until our pick 23/24.
We get these guys in, and if one of 23 or 24 are traded into next year that’s 7 first round picks instead of 8 but who we rate the 2 best in one of those drafts. No brainer for me
The best option for NorF is if they can some how convince melbourne to trade out their 1st rounders
#5 + #9 for #2 + F1 but not sure Melbourne would be interested in that
Norf would take Tauru & Armstrong but that leaves Melbourne with only 1 selection in this years draft pick #2 and they would be wanting 2 bites of the cherry and perfectly placed
#5 + #9 for #2 + F1 but not sure Melbourne would be interested in that
Norf would take Tauru & Armstrong but that leaves Melbourne with only 1 selection in this years draft pick #2 and they would be wanting 2 bites of the cherry and perfectly placed
If the NorF deal doesnt eventuate i wouldnt mind trading #11 for #15 + #21
Gives us #18 , #20 , #21 , #23 , #24
We could use #1 , #6 , #10 on Mids & #15 & #18 on KPF taking 5 players and trade out the picks we want after into 2025
tigerdan
Norm Smith Medallist
I used to think that way until I realized that GWS have a decent hand to play.
North can just trade their F1 with GWS and go to the draft with 2 and 15.
Unless you are talking of doing a straight swap 2 for 6 & 24?
Our good culture was ruined in 2020 when our coach cheated on his wife and everyone was put under pressure in isolation because of a so-called dangerous virus.
Yze has the job of rebuilding it and he was never going to achieve that with some of the players that are now gone. The players left are all part of the good culture and the younger blokes need to create their own club culture. I don’t think we’ll be drafting any flogs!
I don’t think Norf fans are grasping it is their club desperate to get back into the early part of the draft in a more substantial way after giving pick 25 for a 150cm player.
We aren’t budging unless deal is favourable for us.
Most impressive key forward
- Feb 14, 2018
- 2,481
- 4,578
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Fox Sports article today
"a genuine possibility they trade with North Melbourne for Pick 2. The Herald Sun reported recently North Melbourne is open to offering Pick 2 and a future first-rounder in exchange for Richmond’s Picks 6 and 11"
if you can't believe what you read on the internet, what can you believe?
You weren't going too bad until you had us trading 11 for Dons or Dees F1's
23 and even moreso 24 (1st pick 2nd night) will generate F1's, if we want to trade them out.
Blair has said, more than once, that this draft is worth trading into, would be silly just to trade out of it again just for the sake of contractual balance.
And nor should we. We have the draft capital they crave, if they want it, they have to pay overs for it.
It's the other way around. You only get picks as per your list spots. If you consolidate picks such that you have less than list spots, you just get extra picks added at the end of the draft.
The culture of the clubs is fine , we’re light on for emerging talent , there’s a difference
They could have kept 25 and got a very handy player, but maybe the plan for them all along was to split pick 2.
Clarko, much like Dimma (good mates) have made it patently obvious that they want experience injected into their sides, they've either said it or intimated it many times. I have a feeling that Clarko demanded that his recruiters get Darling, Parker and Daniel, nothing else makes sense. You could probably throw McQualter in with this lot too, why else would WCE split pick 3?
- Aug 15, 2015
- 10,365
- 33,479
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Agreed. As a pure mid he’s as good as anyone.
Ticks all the boxes apart from not being a Vic
As a 17 yr old tested and ran a 2.9 20m . Debuted in the SANFL . Was an AA.
24 was an interrupted season for him. But still blitzed at SANFL level on heavy grounds that didn’t necessarily suit his game.
6 & 24 gets you a straight 2, nothing else !! maybe 62 to use on Davo if we want him.
