His A1 consistent form and that he was able to replicate that form against men in the VFL with no time to adapt.What data? That he gets the most ball?
I’d argue Langford and Draper are equally bankable based on that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
His A1 consistent form and that he was able to replicate that form against men in the VFL with no time to adapt.What data? That he gets the most ball?
I’d argue Langford and Draper are equally bankable based on that.
North couldn't telegram more their desire to split pick 2
Because if the guy you're picking at 10 is going to be there at 13, you're getting pick 29 for nothing.That trade makes no ****ing sense at all. We literally had pick 32 before we handed it to Brisbane and massively overpaid to get pick 20. Why would we be trading out one pick to get two shitter ones when we only have enough list spaces for our current picks.
It would make more sense if we were trading 18 and 20/23/24 to get 13.
I can see North finishing above us, WCE and the Dons at an absolute minimum. Agreed their defence is a huge issue but it's not inconceivable they finish above Stk, Ade, Melb, Collingwood and Port, too.Who can North finish above? Their defence is putrid. Midfield is good but still very young. Not sure if adding an over the hill Parker to it will sort their problems. Darling is also just about cooked.
I have us last, WCE second last and North third last. Essendon probably round out the bottom four.
Travaglia more superior runner than Judson. And like another poster brought up. Judson is a forward half player, we shouldn’t be robbing Peter to pay Paul.It’s all well and good but Richmond have said they could try Judson off half back to far better kick that Travaglia. Both have a high IQ, big engines.
That makes no sense whatsoever. Port are making out like bandits. What’s the point of even including them in the trade above if North don’t end up with any of their picks?The pick swap could be something like this…
Pot give 13, 29 =1865
Get pick 11,23 = 2144
NM give pick 2 =2517
Get 10,18,F4 = 2587
Rich give: 10,11,18,23,F4
Get: 2,13,29
Rich = 1,2,6,13,,20,24,29
Or North like a player in the 25-30 range (there’s some KPP who are tipped to go there) and pick 2 trade is as simple as 6 + 29 for 2…That trade makes no ****ing sense at all. We literally had pick 32 before we handed it to Brisbane and massively overpaid to get pick 20. Why would we be trading out one pick to get two shitter ones when we only have enough list spaces for our current picks.
It would make more sense if we were trading 18 and 20/23/24 to get 13.
North couldn't telegram more their desire to split pick 2
How could Port get 2 better picks for 2 worst picks.The pick swap could be something like this…
Pot give 13, 29 =1865
Get pick 11,23 = 2144
NM give pick 2 =2517
Get 10,18,F4 = 2587
Rich give: 10,11,18,23,F4
Get: 2,13,29
Rich = 1,2,6,13,,20,24,29
Just watched a few vid's on James Barrat. He won the Pioneers best and fairest. He is 194cm but played midfield/forward in some games, kicked 22 goals in 13 games in the Coates League before going back and being named Rookie Me team of the year at Full back. This on top of missing his entire 2023 season.
Okay he looks and moves a bit like Rance, so maybe that got him the gig, but he seems to have some sort of upside. Looks a good pic around our 23 mark. Any one know more?
So I’m not the only one who is pissed about handing the Lions too much for pick 20. We got bent over. We gave Brisbane the biggest points gain ever in the draft. I know I’m going to hear points don’t count bullshite but in this case they do.That trade makes no ****ing sense at all. We literally had pick 32 before we handed it to Brisbane and massively overpaid to get pick 20. Why would we be trading out one pick to get two shitter ones when we only have enough list spaces for our current picks.
It would make more sense if we were trading 18 and 20/23/24 to get 13.
All good in theory.Ok hear me out.
As it stands we hold 1/3 of the picks in the first 24. So how do we cash in and get the best value?
Well let's look at the rumours
- North wants to split pick 2 to get at least 2 picks in R1.
- Saints looking to split pick 8 for multiple 1s.
- Port interested in getting 10 off us as part of a multi team deal with 13 involved.
- GWS possibly involved in the multi team trade and have 15 16 & 21 to deal with.
So here's my plan
FOOK EM ALL
Hold all our picks until the night of the draft and let North come to us when pick 2 is on the clock, desperately looking to trade and get pick 2, their F1 & F2 in 2025 to get pick 11 & 23. Take it or leave it.
Then, when the Saints are on the clock at pick 8 and are looking to trade the deal is pick 8 & 32 for 18 & 20
Now that we've got pick 8 we call GWS and tell them 10 & 24 is on the table for 15 16 & 37.
Essendon having matched a bid for Kako are looking at getting back into the draft and with Melbourne a good chance of fighting us for the spoon as they implode we want the Dees 2025 R1 for 16
Final draft hand is:
1 2 6 8 15 32 & 37 in 2024
1. Lalor
2. FOS
6. Smillie
8. Reid
15. Best Available KPP
32. Best Available KPP/Ruck
37. Davidson
Spot open for SSP
2025:
Our 1st & 2nd
Norths F1 & F2
Dees F1
View attachment 2155765
Lol I’m so glad posters on this board aren’t our list managers. Your complete focus to try and f every other club will ostracise RFC from the competition, and clubs will stop dealing with us.Ok hear me out.
As it stands we hold 1/3 of the picks in the first 24. So how do we cash in and get the best value?
Well let's look at the rumours
- North wants to split pick 2 to get at least 2 picks in R1.
- Saints looking to split pick 8 for multiple 1s.
- Port interested in getting 10 off us as part of a multi team deal with 13 involved.
- GWS possibly involved in the multi team trade and have 15 16 & 21 to deal with.
So here's my plan
FOOK EM ALL
Hold all our picks until the night of the draft and let North come to us when pick 2 is on the clock, desperately looking to trade and get pick 2, their F1 & F2 in 2025 to get pick 11 & 23. Take it or leave it.
Then, when the Saints are on the clock at pick 8 and are looking to trade the deal is pick 8 & 32 for 18 & 20
Now that we've got pick 8 we call GWS and tell them 10 & 24 is on the table for 15 16 & 37.
Essendon having matched a bid for Kako are looking at getting back into the draft and with Melbourne a good chance of fighting us for the spoon as they implode we want the Dees 2025 R1 for 16
Final draft hand is:
1 2 6 8 15 32 & 37 in 2024
1. Lalor
2. FOS
6. Smillie
8. Reid
15. Best Available KPP
32. Best Available KPP/Ruck
37. Davidson
Spot open for SSP
2025:
Our 1st & 2nd
Norths F1 & F2
Dees F1
View attachment 2155765
Ok hear me out.
As it stands we hold 1/3 of the picks in the first 24. So how do we cash in and get the best value?
Well let's look at the rumours
- North wants to split pick 2 to get at least 2 picks in R1.
- Saints looking to split pick 8 for multiple 1s.
- Port interested in getting 10 off us as part of a multi team deal with 13 involved.
- GWS possibly involved in the multi team trade and have 15 16 & 21 to deal with.
So here's my plan
FOOK EM ALL
This GIF is slightly overused but can't see a better use for it than here...I think if we were going to select Davidson we would have done so in the MSD. Little chance we pick him up in the ND I'd say.
The 2024 draft gif.This GIF is slightly overused but can't see a better use for it than here...
Probably in the rookie draft if we have any spots leftI think if we were going to select Davidson we would have done so in the MSD. Little chance we pick him up in the ND I'd say.
CTE much more of a concern if your brain actually has the capability to support you throughout a whole career with (on average) a higher earning capacity then what he’d get from footballMay as well do the footy for 5-10 years and then do the doctoring after that