List Mgmt. 2024 Draft - Post Trade Period Edition

[tigerfan1961]

I still think we should just do 6 and 18/20/23 for 2 and take the risk out of it come draft night.
I've maintained this all the way through.

I understand there is similar quality within the range of picks 5 through 8 but why not just pick the two players we actually want at 1 and 2?

North still have list spots they need to fill, outside of the two active picks they currently hold. Something has got to give come draft night and I'd be surprised if it didn't include us.

Blair knows what he’s doing, wait and see what happens on the night I guess but we seem to be their best option to trade down pick 2

 

[Aristotle Pickett]

View attachment 2164048

Inside ruthless edge of AFL’s new twin king stars… and the clubs that could draft them

Inside ruthless edge of AFL’s new twin king stars… and the clubs that could draft them

www.foxsports.com.au

Sounds like these two will be punching on all the time.

 

[lizard man]

If we did something unexpected like drafting smillie at pick 1 would that somehow increase the chance of fos slipping to pick 6

 

[DontArgue4]

If we did something unexpected like drafting smillie at pick 1 would that somehow increase the chance of fos slipping to pick 6

What would be the point in that if we could just take FOS at 1 and then Smilie at 6 anyway?

 

[Aristotle Pickett]

I still think we should just do 6 and 18/20/23 for 2 and take the risk out of it come draft night.
I've maintained this all the way through.

I understand there is similar quality within the range of picks 5 through 8 but why not just pick the two players we actually want at 1 and 2?

North still have list spots they need to fill, outside of the two active picks they currently hold. Something has got to give come draft night and I'd be surprised if it didn't include us.

Because then we lose a draft pick in a superdraft and the top 7 mids are the same standard anyway.

 

[GoTigers2015]

6 + 18 for lolnorfs 2 + F1 or Gagf

Or we chuck in 29 too if we trade 11 for ports 13 + 29

I’d be happy with that

Can't see a trade being done. Richmond says no to 6 +11 for 2 +F1 because pick 11 is more valuable than F1.

North don't want to trade down to 10 because they have a high risk of missing Tauru and can trade their F1 to GWS earlier than pick 18.

Port won't trade up until they know who is available at pick 11.

 

[fargothegreat]

I wonder which way we'll go if we end up with the choice between Jagga and Smillie at 7?

 

[tiger_tough]

Would seem that as interest grows in players his rankings adjust. The Phantom next week is the big one though

Yeah but why would clubs interest in players change Twomeys rankings? That should only be taken into account for his phantom draft next week.

Anyway, whogivesashit.gif

 

[lizard man]

What would be the point in that if we could just take FOS at 1 and then Smilie at 6 anyway?

I think it’s possible someone will take smillie before pick 6

 

[tiger_tough]

I think it’s possible someone will take smillie before pick 6

Possible, but not likely at this stage. If Dees don't pick him then I think he's guaranteed to be available.

 

[Wacky Tiger]

Because then we lose a draft pick in a superdraft and the top 7 mids are the same standard anyway.

Allegedly


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

 

[Wacky Tiger]

I still think we should just do 6 and 18/20/23 for 2 and take the risk out of it come draft night.
I've maintained this all the way through.

I understand there is similar quality within the range of picks 5 through 8 but why not just pick the two players we actually want at 1 and 2?

North still have list spots they need to fill, outside of the two active picks they currently hold. Something has got to give come draft night and I'd be surprised if it didn't include us.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

 

[lizard man]

I wonder which way we'll go if we end up with the choice between Jagga and Smillie at 7?

Smillie

 

[Coach_Required]

Can't see a trade being done. Richmond says no to 6 +11 for 2 +F1 because pick 11 is more valuable than F1.

North don't want to trade down to 10 because they have a high risk of missing Tauru and can trade their F1 to GWS earlier than pick 18.

Port won't trade up until they know who is available at pick 11.

Let's hope so, I want to make North use pick 2. Don't care who they get.

 

[Coach_Required]

I think it’s possible someone will take smillie before pick 6

It just means someone else drops to 6 that we like.

 

[Muddiemoose]

Because then we lose a draft pick in a superdraft and the top 7 mids are the same standard anyway.

Don’t think it’s quite that simple

Maybe similar standard of player but all players that play very differently and have very different attributes

These are the kids we will be building our entire clubs future around so it’s an opportunity to shape our midfield and essentially gameplan around what we want it to look like

Even Lalor and FOS who are both “mid - fwd” options have very different strengths and weaknesses when it comes to how they play with Lalor in the Dedoey/ Dusty mould and FOS more Heeney like

 

[lvt06]

Smillie

195cm midfield beast with 1 contested mark for an entire year.

100% think we have better options.

 

[GoTigers2015]

20 draft invitees, interesting no Taj Hotton or Luke Trainor

 

[sportshow]

I wonder which way we'll go if we end up with the choice between Jagga and Smillie at 7?

I'm Jagga as i - probably unfairly - get RCD vibes potentially with Smillie ....

 

[Aristotle Pickett]

Don’t think it’s quite that simple

Maybe similar standard of player but all players that play very differently and have very different attributes

These are the kids we will be building our entire clubs future around so it’s an opportunity to shape our midfield and essentially gameplan around what we want it to look like

Even Lalor and FOS who are both “mid - fwd” options have very different strengths and weaknesses when it comes to how they play with Lalor in the Dedoey/ Dusty mould and FOS more Heeney like

Yes but a lot of people are struggling to understand that there's no obvious ranking for that first group of mids. People like to see a definitive ranking but this year there isn't.
Clubs will pick best available with the first 6 picks, they are not picking for specific attributes I don't think and it's a subjective decision.

 

[Morro]

20 draft invitees, interesting no Taj Hotton or Luke Trainor

View attachment 2164144View attachment 2164145

Trainor sliding doesn't surprise me at all.

Very similar defender to Jack Lukocious, not a KPD, not strong in the contest but a delicious kick of the pill.

 

[Muddiemoose]

Yes but a lot of people are struggling to understand that there's no obvious ranking for that first group of mids. People like to see a definitive ranking but this year there isn't.
Clubs will pick best available with the first 6 picks, they are not picking for specific attributes.

What (we nuffies see and read) is very different to what is said inside the clubs

Just because we don’t have a clear ranking doesn’t mean they don’t

 

[Aristotle Pickett]

What (we nuffies see and read) is very different to what is said inside the clubs

Just because we don’t have a clear ranking doesn’t mean they don’t

Well they have to try and rank them but that's why we didn't trade pick 6 for pick 2

 

[prodigy]

Because then we lose a draft pick in a superdraft and the top 7 mids are the same standard anyway.

Oh really? I had no idea. This is my first time visiting this thread since it's inception and I'm sure you are the first person who has raised these salient points as well.

My sincere apologies.

 

[Morro]

What (we nuffies see and read) is very different to what is said inside the clubs

Just because we don’t have a clear ranking doesn’t mean they don’t

speak for yaself numb nuts