List Mgmt. 2024 Draft - Post Trade Period Edition

Pick 1

  • Finn O'Sullivan

  • Sam Lalor

  • Jagga Smith


Results are only viewable after voting.

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

Richmond 1- sam lalor
N.melbourne 2 - Finn O'Sullivan
Brisbane 3 - Levi Ashcroft
Carlton 4- syd Draper
Adelaide 5- Josh Smillie
Melbourne 6- harvey Langford
Richmond 7- Alex tauru
Gold Coast 8- leo Lombard
Saint Kilda 9'-jagga Smith
Saint Kilda 10- Toby Travaglia
Essendon 11- Isaac kakko
Melbourne 12- harry armstrong
Richmond 13- joe Berry
Richmond 14- Xavier Lindsay
West coast 15- bo Allan
Port power 16- l.trainor
Fremantle 17- t.hotton
Gws giants 18- c hynes
Gws giants 19 -m.reid
Bulldogs 20- j dattoli
Richmond 21 trade to Saint Kilda for future first and pick 32
Saint Kilda 21- jonty faull
Sydney 22- m. Whitlock
Richmond 23- j.whitlock
gws giants 24- j. Shanahan
Sydney 25- h.oliver
Pick 26 Richmond trade to Adelaide for future first
Adelaide 26- a Dodson
Richmond 27- o hannaford
Bulldogs 28- j alger
West coast 29- k.gerryn
Port power- 30- a Clarke
Fremantle 31- Hamish Davis
Richmond 32- James barrat
-------------------------------------------------
In summary
Richmond get
1'- sam lalor
7- Alex tauru
13- joe Berry
14- Xavier Lindsay
23' - j whitlock
27- o hannaford
32- James barrat
 
I can’t work out why Smillie is sliding from 8 to 10 in this espn draft?

Says he has potential to be best in class but slots him behind Lindsay and Travaglia? Not like either has a better season than Smillie, averaged 25 and a goal at Coates, and was captain and probably best player of 2 afl academy vs vfl games, the other 2 had better champs, his were just okay.

Writes it off as difference between what he is and what he might be are too far apart?? Even if he doesn’t reach that ceiling he’s already starting from a higher base than Lindsay or Travaglia with way higher scope.

It’s just strange how as Smillie has become the odd man out in this draft. I wonder if he’d had a crack at vfl he would be in contention for 1.
Because they say he's a gamble, "But he doesn't move around the ground well enough right now to be a midfielder and needs to use his height to advantage in the air. What Smillie is, and what he could become, are too far apart to be confident he reaches his ceiling."
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Luke Trainer's manager said he's hsd 4 concussions before
Fun Alarm GIF by ZDF Magazin Royale
 
I can’t work out why Smillie is sliding from 8 to 10 in this espn draft?

Says he has potential to be best in class but slots him behind Lindsay and Travaglia? Not like either has a better season than Smillie, averaged 25 and a goal at Coates, and was captain and probably best player of 2 afl academy vs vfl games, the other 2 had better champs, his were just okay.

Writes it off as difference between what he is and what he might be are too far apart?? Even if he doesn’t reach that ceiling he’s already starting from a higher base than Lindsay or Travaglia with way higher scope.

It’s just strange how as Smillie has become the odd man out in this draft. I wonder if he’d had a crack at vfl he would be in contention for 1.
you just cannot compare Smillie with Travaglia.

player v player it is Smillie >>>>> Travaglia
 
I feel like that's such a narrow way to view this situation.
Just because we have a good hand now, doesn't mean it can't get better.

But hey, maybe I'm wrong. I guess that's a possibility.
Not wrong, but I think your fixation on getting FOS is clouding your view on the draft. In an ideal world landing Lalor & FOS at 1 & 2 would be great if they're clearly ranked the 2 best players in the pool.

For mine, FOS alone isn't as good as 1 of Draper Langford Smith Smillie Reid and 1 of Armstrong Travaglia Tauru Trainor Allan Shanahan Hotton Lindsay Whitlocks Dodson Berry Faull and the like that we'd lose by trading out one of the picks from 10-20, that North would want to give up 2
 
Cannot see any way North take Tauru at no.2.

They will either go Lalor or FOS because they are half forward/mids which they could use, or deem it more necessary to go for a back, Tauru.

They will get Taura at 6 no problem, and will get say our pick 20, so an extra very good type.
It would make zero sense to reach for Tauru at 2.

We would be daft to turn down 6 and 20 for 2 given how many many picks we have.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top