Just had a play around with the DFS calc and I got the same result, in by $10k. Fingers crossedMy math says you're in by $10k but I don't calculate it like others have. We'll see.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just had a play around with the DFS calc and I got the same result, in by $10k. Fingers crossedMy math says you're in by $10k but I don't calculate it like others have. We'll see.
I usually finish midfield last because you can get stuck with who to upgrade.Liking this. Gets rid of a tanking value rook and gets in a new mid. Unfortunately didn’t have enough to get Day with Howes, but Uwland is doing decently enough at D6 at the moment so can go one more weeks before upgrading him and Howes
All rookies out of the midfield and is the first section “complete”
View attachment 1994502
The only thing stopping me from getting rid of Fyfe is his bye. If he can avoid the vest for 2 more weeks he’ll be gone.My 3 options currently for the week.. Going to hold Reid again most likely as his BE is way lower than Fyfe's. Which way we leaning?
1st trade is basically just getting rid of high BE guys. $100k left over
View attachment 1994496
2nd trade gets me to a Whitfield instead of Sexton, but will keep Graham if he plays this week. Means i keep Lazzaro with a high BE and miss out on Richards. $41k left over
View attachment 1994497
3rd trade im not really liking, this would only happen if Graham plays. Means i keep Lazzaro aswell and miss out on Richards. 20k left over.
View attachment 1994537
Oh I agree but I’m this unique position with the other lines that it’s hard to gauge who to upgrade thereI usually finish midfield last because you can get stuck with who to upgrade.
Yeah i do want to keep him purely because of his bye but his BE is 93 so hes losing money and his scoring hasn't been the greatest and is a sub risk.The only thing stopping me from getting rid of Fyfe is his bye. If he can avoid the vest for 2 more weeks he’ll be gone.
Can’t see him being rested for a big home game against the Pies, but I must admit away to Melbourne has sub written all over it.Yeah i do want to keep him purely because of his bye but his BE is 93 so hes losing money and his scoring hasn't been the greatest and is a sub risk.
Definitely, got a decent chunk of CBAs when he wasn’t there IIRCTempted to do:
Roberts > Caldwell
Rankine > Sexton
Is Caldwell the play if Parish is out for a while?
Definitely, got a decent chunk of CBAs when he wasn’t there IIRC