Trades 2024 Fantasy Round 6 Trades

[Barrybran]

Hopefully Dangerfield is named and Clark is omitted

 

[tigs2010]

As much as i trust your advice i need the seconded lol. So we can loop bye players right until last game? Bloody hell i wish i knew this last week.

Yeah they'll lock beginning of North v Hawks

 

[staffa002]

Yeah they'll lock beginning of North v Hawks

Damm this has costed me atleast 100 points over the weeks. When did this stuff change?

 

[SM]

As much as i trust your advice i need the seconded lol. So we can loop bye players right until last game? Bloody hell i wish i knew this last week.

Yep, players on their bye only lock when the last game starts so they're easy loop options.

 

[JDWCE]

Interesting tweet put out by Jaiden Popowski. Of the top 10,000 (counts me in) 5,941 don't have all of Heeney, Sheezel and Steele.
A staggering 1819 don't have both Heeney and Sheezel (me again)
1493 don't have Steel and Sheezel,
Drops to just 281 don't have both Heeney and Steele (me again)

Sheezel the highest non-ownership at 376, followed by Heeney at 46, then Steele at 36

I’ve got all 3 and struggling to even stay in the top 20k you beauty

 

[Mezzoculo]

Hodor RUC/FWD on the cards?

More like Ruck/Bench dpp...

 

[Phar Ace]

Flip that around...

5,941 (nearly 60% of teams) HAVE all three
~3,500 have two of three
Sheezel the highest owned of the three
Only 6 teams have none of them

I think that's 4059 HAVE all three (over half don't)

 

[Phar Ace]

They should both get a decent run after their last games. Drury possibly safer than Biggy. Kal Dawson is out for 2 or 3 more weeks. When Kal comes back it will be for either Biggie or Corr. Hopefully Corr.

What do you think The Zurhaar back means for Drury?

 

[Phar Ace]

That's the worst of both worlds. Not a red dot you can use to loop, and not generating any cash.

Could be, but it does have to be figured out on the basis of other options too. Danger back this week, Guthrie not far away, think he'll be a red dot soon enough, probably even this week I'd tip. he's on the chopper I reckon.

 

[Phar Ace]

Depends on what else you can do for mine. I've got Clark losing $10k this week and about $10k the week after if he plays. As much as I need to move Clark on, moving Duursma on gives me an extra $100k to play with, which opens up those Hill / Duursma / Caldwell / Rankine trades if that's the direction I want to go.

Yep, same - sometimes it's a competition for Rook value to get up to someone, so the less value sits and vegies out!

 

[Barrybran]

I think that's 4059 HAVE all three (over half don't)

The tweet being discussed for those playing at home

 

[Phar Ace]

Hodor RUC/FWD on the cards?

Hasn't played any games yet has he?

 

[Phar Ace]

The tweet being discussed for those playing at home

It was a "hasn't" question, not a "has" question if I recall correctly.....

 

[Phar Ace]

I’ve got all 3 and struggling to even stay in the top 20k you beauty

expecting you to flash home on the outside rails then

 

[SM]

It was a "hasn't" question, not a "has" question if I recall correctly.....

Yes but then read Popowski's tweet. "Top 10,000 ownership of.."

 

[bettingonbetts]

The tweet being discussed for those playing at home

Yeah this is definitely the ownership percentage. Warnies question is irrelevant.
He stated ‘ownership’

 

[leg1222]

Lukosious or hill or caldwell

 

[Shaunn]

The tweet being discussed for those playing at home

I'm in the 1493 of people currently xD

 

[Phar Ace]

Yeah this is definitely the ownership percentage. Warnies question is irrelevant.
He stated ‘ownership’

But how can it be ownership? - are we trying to conclude that only 47 teams in top 10,000 own Heeney? - doubt it, only 36 teams own Steele?, and only 376 teams own Sheezel. That couldn't even be right in the top 1000 I'd reckon. Something's wrong.

 

[WCEprod]

But how can it be ownership? - are we trying to conclude that only 47 teams in top 10,000 own Heeney? - doubt it, only 36 teams own Steele?, and only 376 teams own Sheezel. That couldn't even be right in the top 1000 I'd reckon. Something's wrong.

47 own only Heeney but not Sheezel or Steele

 

[Medex]

But how can it be ownership? - are we trying to conclude that only 47 teams in top 10,000 own Heeney? - doubt it, only 36 teams own Steele?, and only 376 teams own Sheezel. That couldn't even be right in the top 1000 I'd reckon. Something's wrong.

47 teams own ONLY Heeney. 1819 teams own only Heeney and Sheezel. 281 teams own only Heeney and Steele, 5941 teams own all 3. 47+1819+281+5941 teams own Heeney

 

[4tune8]

But how can it be ownership? - are we trying to conclude that only 47 teams in top 10,000 own Heeney? - doubt it, only 36 teams own Steele?, and only 376 teams own Sheezel. That couldn't even be right in the top 1000 I'd reckon. Something's wrong.

Out of the 3 players mentioned 47 own just Heeney, 1819 own Heeney and Sheezel, 5941 own Heeney, Sheezel and Steele. The ownership of Heeney is the sum of those 3 distributions, 47 + 1819 + 5941 = 7807.

Edit....as above, + 281 = 8088 of the top 10000 own Heeney

 

[tigs2010]

Phar Ace your brain ain't braining brahhhhh

 

[Phar Ace]

But how can it be ownership? - are we trying to conclude that only 47 teams in top 10,000 own Heeney? - doubt it, only 36 teams own Steele?, and only 376 teams own Sheezel. That couldn't even be right in the top 1000 I'd reckon. Something's wrong.

OK. think I'm reading it right now:

of the 10,000 top teams, only 47 teams only own Heeney (and not the other two)
of the 10,000 top teams, only 281 teams only own Steele and Heeney (and not Sheezel)
of the 10,000 top teams, 5941 own all three

 

[Phar Ace]

Phar Ace your brain ain't braining brahhhhh

Thanks Einstein