- Jul 16, 2013
- 14,866
- 19,546
- AFL Club
- Essendon
As per the constitution, it's actually a red sash. It's just got a black band around it.
Yes I know but it looks like two bands so that is how it will be described.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
As per the constitution, it's actually a red sash. It's just got a black band around it.
reckon it’d look good if the black lines were a little narrower and further apart, with red shortsThe double sash looks stupid
and it isn’t even covered in writing or windows movie maker effects from 1998Who cares . It is red and black.
And that's fine. Nothing wrong with being wrong. We all make mistakes.I reckon the clash jumper looks great. Big fan
Even modsAnd that's fine. Nothing wrong with being wrong. We all make mistakes.
Even mods
Okay ex mods then
Sponsor logos need to blend in with the shirtMore stoked about the clash jumper TBH:
View attachment 1866781
Can't please everyone but definitely the best clash jumper we've had so far.
Looks better already, not sure what the suits are thinking not making the sash black.
Probably the same thing a lot of club's suits think - if we **** this up we can sell an "improved" design to the same shmucks next season.Looks better already, not sure what the suits are thinking not making the sash black.
Are they fielding a side, thought they were supposed to have a few out?I've always been against the reverse jumper (black sash on red) but I have to say, I've completely flipped. Knox played the game yesterday before my son's and their jumper looked really good in person.
Whilst I don't mind our current clash there's really no need for the skid marks. I know it's to technically meet the requirements for red sash on black but come on... it's clearly not what was meant by "red sash on a black guernsey" or however it would have been worded
Would have been u11 or u10Are they fielding a side, thought they were supposed to have a few out?