-
-
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Prediction 2024 Jumper numbers
- Thread starter Jen2310
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Mar 28, 2023
- 14,522
- 28,171
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
We not giving the 28 away yet?
- Aug 16, 2009
- 4,303
- 7,839
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Celtics, Canucks
Give it a week
MooreTreloar
Premiership Player
- Apr 2, 2014
- 3,771
- 5,088
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Rams, Raptors, Leafs, Blue Jays
Do you think there’s a chance Long will keep his VFL number (55 I think) and change next year?
The Phantom
Border Collie-wood
If they reassigned a number like 28 this year, and you had two players owning it, it’d play havoc with websites, data records, and more.
Won’t happen from a technical or practical point of view, let alone a respectful one.
Won’t happen from a technical or practical point of view, let alone a respectful one.
- Aug 16, 2009
- 4,303
- 7,839
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Celtics, Canucks
I don't think anyone on this board thinks they'll re-assign it this year
- Aug 16, 2009
- 4,303
- 7,839
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Celtics, Canucks
What do I win?
For those among us who are into such 'nerdy' stuff, this shows the jumper numbers for every listed player at all of the clubs in 2024:
I think it's rather fascinating looking at which numbers aren't in use currently, and trying to work out if there's a good reason why some of them aren't being used. In our case there's just one, of course, with no. 42 not in circulation, but every other number up to 46 allotted for the 45 players on our list this year. Richmond aren't using several of the low/early numbers, and have gone over the 50 mark with their two recent draftees.
I think it's rather fascinating looking at which numbers aren't in use currently, and trying to work out if there's a good reason why some of them aren't being used. In our case there's just one, of course, with no. 42 not in circulation, but every other number up to 46 allotted for the 45 players on our list this year. Richmond aren't using several of the low/early numbers, and have gone over the 50 mark with their two recent draftees.
