Discussion 2025 Fantasy Pre-Season Planning Discussion

Remove this Banner Ad

What are the thoughts on Sheez? He's so highly owned but I'm not convinced he's going 112. I'm thinking fade but at 35% it does make it hard.
I’m going to fade Sheezel ….. doubt he’ll take the game away from you ….. don’t see the value in the pick
 

Log in to remove this ad.

I have decided to go with majority younger guys coming through this year i.e. move away from the bonts, petraccas, neales, olivers, lairds, gawns, grundys etc; I believe they will still be good players in their own right but just trying a different strategy. I have a couple of older heads in this team but only because of value hoping to pick up cash or they score well and become keepers - Looking at you Jack Macrae and Caleb Daniel!!

1734654107756.png
 
Last edited:
Its shown time and time again that the best way to build your starting squad is to not grab those top priced guys other than the rucks. Too much value out there to be picking a guy while expecting him to drop anything off his starting priced at. Remember players need to beat their starting value to stay at the same price, so even if Sheezel goes at 112 for the first 5 or 6 weeks he will drop probably $30k or so in that time. One poor game and his price tanks hard, then everybody else grabs him at sub-1mil as their first upgrade.

Hes on the first bye, not many other defenders on that bye are going to be super popular, but you could leave him as a target for post r12 bye

You could make that same argument though for the rucks.

Theres a couple value picks there as well below the two top rucks. Then if the top 2 need to pump out 120s from day 1, there’s a good chance they will dump some decent coin early as well.

Case in point Marshall this year, I started with him but he still dropped 100k in the first 6 weeks of the year. Good chance that happens again this year.

Think it’s all about balance. It’s tough to start the top rucks and 1 or 2 other uber premos as then you’ve diluted the cap to much. However you can start one or the other. Overall the outcome is similar. You’ll want to grab the other one at some point and there’s a good chance the one you start with, could loose a bit of coin early.

Still think you need to pay up for one though for a solid captain option from the start. Just a choice of which one while acknowledging there’s a good chance they may all loose some coin early.
 
You could make that same argument though for the rucks.

Theres a couple value picks there as well below the two top rucks. Then if the top 2 need to pump out 120s from day 1, there’s a good chance they will dump some decent coin early as well.

Case in point Marshall this year, I started with him but he still dropped 100k in the first 6 weeks of the year. Good chance that happens again this year.
With the rucks its different because of a couple of reasons. Generally no DPP options, you only have 2 spots on field, and rucks are generally quite reliable scorers/captaincy options.
Even with Marshall having a poor period early in the year I still think starting him was a great move.
Those reasons tend to favour a good ruck over a good mid, UNLESS there is a good cheaper option who you know will have 20+ points upside and the #1 ruck role. Value isnt as valuable in the ruckline imo
Think it’s all about balance. It’s tough to start the top rucks and 1 or 2 other uber premos as then you’ve diluted the cap to much. However you can start one or the other. Overall the outcome is similar. You’ll want to grab the other one at some point and there’s a good chance the one you start with, could loose a bit of coin early.

Still think you need to pay up for one though for a solid captain option from the start. Just a choice of which one while acknowledging there’s a good chance they may all loose some coin early.
Generally you can get away with it because of the rucks or by picking one of the next level down premos, like a 105ish avg mid and using them as your captain for a bit if it means you get more value into your side.
It gets mentioned every year, but the top averaging mids generally dont back it up. I think Tom Mitchell is the most recent to not be poor the next year
 
My biggest unsure in my starting lineup at the moment. As a pure mid, I’m not sure he goes at 112. However I’m sure he goes close (105-110) and will be a top 2 defender anyway.

Is it easier to just start him even if he loses ~50k?
My thoughts also, thinking Whitfield will hold 110+
 
There’s a lot of million dollar players now, what is value now a days?
Divide it by the magic number and work out the priced at figure.

100 average is just above $1m. (1.02m or so) - see Patty Cripps.

That 800-950 range is where the value is if you think they can be a top player in their line.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Don't see why they wouldn't put any attention into him when there's noone else xD. But im still deciding on him, Green or Rozee as my M1.
Against Richmond youre not going to be thinking about stopping them, you're going to be thinking about how you fill your own boots.

It's like when you verse the bunch of skinny 18 year old kids in social basketball who like to **** around and shoot threes. I'm out there to drop 40, not worry if their best player gets a few threes off. We're winning by 50 regardless.
 
Divide it by the magic number and work out the priced at figure.

100 average is just above $1m. (1.02m or so) - see Patty Cripps.

That 800-950 range is where the value is if you think they can be a top player in their line.
Typically what I do is build a list of initial players I am interested in.
Then put what I think they can average vs what they are priced at and sort by who is the most value (diff), and that is what I base my team on.

Good system, but unfortunately my predictions are always way off.
 
Don't see why they wouldn't put any attention into him when there's noone else xD. But im still deciding on him, Green or Rozee as my M1.
lol itll make 0 difference whether Taranto has 50 touches per game or 5. Clubs just wont care.
Same thing as Miller and Steele of a few years ago, or Tom Mitchell just before that.
They dont do enough damage with it and its not like teams will be afraid of losing.

Teams generally only tag if they think they cant win a normal head to head battle, I dont think anyone is anywhere close to being afraid of that vs Richmond in 2025
 
Typically what I do is build a list of initial players I am interested in.
Then put what I think they can average vs what they are priced at and sort by who is the most value (diff), and that is what I base my team on.

Good system, but unfortunately my predictions are always way off.
I do this too, or have done this.


On reflection I think it makes your assessment too narrow focussed.

It sounds counterintuitive, but i'm starting to think that looking less at the numbers is better. I listen to so many hours of podcasts in the pre-season, have discussions on here, watch pre-season games and look at training reports. It's impossible to synthesize that information down in to a scoring projection, and doing so may confuse or complicate the decision process. I'm thinking of relying more on my subconscious analysis of players - i.e gut feel, because our brains are a lot better at juggling all of that in the back of our mind rather than trying to set it down.

I'll still need to do some sort of projections - as its necessary for draft, but i try and stay away from being too formulaic for classic sides.
 
Planning no Macrae.
Screenshot_20241220-191105~2.png

First side selected = great success! (No Macrae)
Great Success Win GIF


Peatling definitely on watch at his price / new club.
Flanders, no way with that new haircut.
Selected Welsh (utility) as I was sure T.Walker retired.
 
Last edited:
There's a lot of value out there and a shitload of rookies that could debut early. Just going through the mids and there's a bit of risk associated with some of the fallen/underpriced premiums (obviously) but geez, it's hard to go past Oliver (has to have a good preseason) Doc, Petracca, Day etc. Peatling, depending on role, is very hard to pass on.

Then there's the mid rookies, all of Lalor, FOS, Draper, Jagga, Langford, Ashcroft, Smillie, Lombard and Lindsay could well debut early.

There's also a bit of value in defence with Holmes, Dale, Short, Rivers, Mills, Coleman, etc. and a few more rookies to round out the show, like Travaglia, Allan, Oliver and El-Hawli even Reid if he gets a crack. Tauru could be here or forward, just a wait and see on how he goes with the stress fracture in his back.

Forwards are going to be very similar, I'm baulking at paying up for JHF for F1, will probably go with Rankine although not sold there either. Macrae has to be starter along with Sniff, Poo and Daniel. Lynch is interesting at his price and looks to finally be getting a good preseason under his belt, not sure if I can go there though. Curtain and Hewett look to be good at their prices given that I don't like any rookie small forwards or KPF's for that matter. This line has very little variance and all (most) teams will be rolling like this.

I don't see much if any value in the rucks, so will be paying a premium on that that line, firstly for a captain(s) choice but also for the 'set and forget'. So two of Marshall, Gawn and Xerri will fill that possie.

$120k ITB

1734686720283.png
 
Last edited:
This year I put to much emphasis on those extra byes and avoiding them.

Which meant I missed out on Heeney and Gawn and screwed my year before it started.

My lesson for next season, don’t care much about those byes.
It depends on what you think they can avg ect

Heeney was PA 80 and went 105 (well above that pre bye), but 100 was more than enough for a forward position

Also his bye was round 5(no one is that late this year) he had 5 price rises and 4 rounds of scoring pre bye

A predicted 100,100,100,100, 55 = 455

Vs an 80 holding form without bye 80 x 5 = 400

Then after the bye you have Heeney going at 100 vs some fwd at 80 which requires a fairly urgent trade (Before you even take into account $$ gain benefits to Heeney)

Be careful, treat each case individually imo
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Discussion 2025 Fantasy Pre-Season Planning Discussion

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top