Player Watch #29: Joel 'Scarface' Smith – banned for four years

Remove this Banner Ad

We played finals the 2 following years to winning a premiership though

We are probably the opposite of Port 2004
Finished top 4 both years in H&A following the premiership. Disappointing finals campaigns, but we shot ourselves in the foot last season. Had the better of both finals, just couldn't finish. Just because we haven't won another flag, doesn't mean we've been s*! Yep, we lost the 4 most important games since the premiership. But we've hardly been disappointing. Geez the miserable campaigners are out early this season. Not even waiting until after the first game. Would love to see another flag, especially at the G. But we deserved our flag on 21. We didn't wing it on the back of a big month like the Dogs did in 2016, or get lucky at any stage. We earnt it and we've been close since. Some people just look for negativity any chance they get. Fingers crossed we're in for another finals campaign this year. It's wide open.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Shaun Smith was on TODAY potting the club again. Geez you’d be embarrassed as his son. Like I get our club is probably ****ed, but stop trying to deflect from the bad choices your son made.
It's annoying we live in a world where everyone's too scared to just say nah mate, you need to take responsibility as a parent.
 
Last edited:
Shaun Smith was on TODAY potting the club again. Geez you’d be embarrassed as his son. Like I get our club is probably ****ed, but stop trying to deflect from the bad choices your son made.
Link?
 
Shaun is so blind. He blindly defended us when his son was playing for us, now he's son has ****ed up he blindly attacks us because he can't seem to comprehend his son might be a problem.

You know what buddy, this turn the other way and try to cover for your son is the reason he turned out like this. This is why he was stupid enough to think he could get away with doing coke before a game. Yeah we have issues, learn to accept he's a part of it, not a victim of it
 
How wasn't the bloke in the medical model stream where he could do as much blow as he wanted whenever he wanted?

He also had the soft tissue injury history to not raise suspicion when he was pulled before a game with a hammy.

Sorry Joel, this one's on you m8
 
Last edited:
How wasn't the bloke in the medical model stream where he could do as much blow as he wanted whenever he wanted?

He also had the soft tissue injury to not raise suspicion when he was pulled before a game with a hammy.

Sorry Joel, this one's on you m8
Jake Niall or someone wrote that the Joel Smith upcoming hearing will be a referendum on the AFL’s illicit substance policy.

Dunno why given the issue with Smith is that he didn’t make use of it. I don’t know whether he is dumb or just stupid
 
Jake Niall or someone wrote that the Joel Smith upcoming hearing will be a referendum on the AFL’s illicit substance policy.

Dunno why given the issue with Smith is that he didn’t make use of it. I don’t know whether he is dumb or just stupid
Or Both,
 
My takeaway from the following quote from the article, is that Dad's carrying on like a campaigner and giving Joel the absolute shits!!

"Smith also revealed he had urged his son to seek alternative legal advice as part of the SIA process.
“Because I’ve been pushing for another legal opinion, it’s really hurt my relationship with Joel,” he said.
“They have driven a wedge between my son and his family.”"
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

My takeaway from the following quote from the article, is that Dad's carrying on like a campaigner and giving Joel the absolute shits!!

"Smith also revealed he had urged his son to seek alternative legal advice as part of the SIA process.
“Because I’ve been pushing for another legal opinion, it’s really hurt my relationship with Joel,” he said.
“They have driven a wedge between my son and his family.”"
That's the way cookers talk. Pretty sad tbh.
 
I'm sure this has been answered before but one thing I don't quite get is how the SIA got access to Smith's phone records that resulted in the trafficking charge? Did he voluntarily hand over his devices or did they get the right to basically raid his personal belongings once he tested positive?
 
I'm sure this has been answered before but one thing I don't quite get is how the SIA got access to Smith's phone records that resulted in the trafficking charge? Did he voluntarily hand over his devices or did they get the right to basically raid his personal belongings once he tested positive?
from memory I'm pretty sure he was dumb enough to provide the messages as proof he wasn't Joelsniffing for performance enhancing reasons.
 
from memory I'm pretty sure he was dumb enough to provide the messages as proof he wasn't Joelsniffing for performance enhancing reasons.
That's like something out of Arrested Development

 

Remove this Banner Ad

Player Watch #29: Joel 'Scarface' Smith – banned for four years

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top