AFL Player # 3: Darcy Parish

Remove this Banner Ad

1) There is no reason to believe Parish is the sort of character Cotchin was.

2) Even if makes a change mentally, he has neither the speed nor endurance to be anything more than a plodder when it comes to defensive running.
We'll never know now that Stringer has left. They could have gone on walks together.
 
Alright run through it

He’s not agreeing to trade to any of the 8 interstate sides - just had a young kid.

Carlton, Melbourne, North, Bulldogs don’t need an inside mid. Richmond is going in another direction.

Hawthorn you could squint and make an argument for, but the way they play and spending money elsewhere id guess probably not.

Geelong, Collingwood and St Kilda probably the 3 options you could’ve made a case for. But these days such a long contract doesn’t secure you any sort of asset - in fact, it’s seen as a burden to his new team to have to take that on.
Having a kid doesn’t stop you from relocating and the “encumbered” club can pay part of an outgoing player’s salary to entice opposition clubs.
 
Having a kid doesn’t stop you from relocating and the “encumbered” club can pay part of an outgoing player’s salary to entice opposition clubs.

If we’d have to pay a huge amount of salary to get a pick that’s likely to produce a player both worse then Parish and have to pay Parish salary there’s little value in doing that.

At minimum Parish is a former AA mid in the prime of his career who’s adding competition for best 22 spots and selection pressure.

If teams are asking you to give him away you don’t have to. Can just hold and potentially have him rack up 50 a game in the VFL as injury cover. Then trade him in 12 months if he wants to leave.

Just because the rosters unbalanced doesn’t mean we have to turn into Gold Coast and give away perfectly good players we can easily afford
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Remove this Banner Ad

AFL Player # 3: Darcy Parish

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top