Equus
????????????
If this kid is vanilla and will be a solid contributor for the next 10 years then I am happy with that. If rather be safe than sorry.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
You're being ridiculous. If there are 100 players in the draft then there are more than trillions of different orders that they can go in and if your targeting different skills you can't just make a list and tick it off. That would work for the first round only.That decision should have been made before the draft. I said list preferences in order.
Crazy isn't it.Reading this thread is a bit like reading the thread 'Richmond records decade of profits'. We (Richmond supporters) take a genuinely good news story, and turn it into a shitfight, recriminations, predictions of doom, etc.
The Arsene Wenger approachNO! you must follow the list! Even if the list ends up getting you 4 inside mids. FOLLOW THE LIST WITH NO PAUSES!
Big deal they had a discussion about the picks. Much prefer they did that than simply rattle off names without a second thought. Seriously some people will whinge about anything when it comes to the club. Why do I have the feeling that if we had of just rattled off names and missed out on someone that slipped through, you would have complained about that.I never said compiling the list would be easy, however, with the time available prior to draft day to list players of similar standing, you should know who you are going to pick in the event that two players of similar rating and need are available. Before you shoot of mouth declaring 'some of you haven't got a clue', what makes you a expert? Why does your opinion hold anymore weight than others genius?
One thing I did find strange that in previous years we have never taken time to discuss our pick and just read out our next name while it felt like a lot of clubs were having long chats.Big deal they had a discussion about the picks. Much prefer they did that than simply rattle off names without a second thought. Seriously some people will whinge about anything when it comes to the club. Why do I have the feeling that if we had of just rattled off names and missed out on someone that slipped through, you would have complained about that.
Did you even read the article or just the headline?Great so we reached for a bloke who needs foot surgery.
Did you even read the article or just the headline?
On my phone and saw it on another forum. Headline says our first pick may need foot surgery. Article says he's fine and he's running but if it happens to flare up he may require minor surgery. It also says it's a totally different injury to the Navicular injury Trengove has.Article....link??? Please.
On my phone and saw it on another forum. Headline says our first pick may need foot surgery. Article says he's fine and he's running but if it happens to flare up he may require minor surgery. It also says it's a totally different injury to the Navicular injury Trengove has.
I attribute this to the draft being incredibly even for talent outside of the first 5 or so picks all the way to 40.One thing I did find strange that in previous years we have never taken time to discuss our pick and just read out our next name while it felt like a lot of clubs were having long chats.
This year, hardly any clubs chatted before their picks, except for Richmond at every single pick after 12, the draft went very quickly because of this.
Its absolutely crazy to criticise the club for this though. I'm sure we know which players we wanted, it was a matter of working out who we could take at the next pick and still hope that our next preferences would be available at our next selection.
Yours was positive compared to others Frank.I have been fairly negative about him earlier
Reached?You think FJ & Co only started to watch Ellis after our season finished?Great so we reached for a bloke who needs foot surgery.
Great so we reached for a bloke who needs foot surgery.
'May need foot surgery'. That's misrepresenting the facts.Great so we reached for a bloke who needs foot surgery.
That's not what I saw. Plenty of clubs debated who to pick.One thing I did find strange that in previous years we have never taken time to discuss our pick and just read out our next name while it felt like a lot of clubs were having long chats.
This year, hardly any clubs chatted before their picks, except for Richmond at every single pick after 12, the draft went very quickly because of this.
Its absolutely crazy to criticise the club for this though. I'm sure we know which players we wanted, it was a matter of working out who we could take at the next pick and still hope that our next preferences would be available at our next selection.