34,000...... Hawks and Tigers are not big 4 or even big 8

Remove this Banner Ad

Sadly didn't go to this one, as it was a Richmond home game.

1. Richmond home game.
2. It appeared the crowd was mainly pro-Hawks - though that could have been just microphone positioning. The roar when port/bris score went up was funny - almost the biggest of the entire night.

From those that were there, was it a 50/50 split? Or were the tigers outnumbered at their own home game?
 
Sadly didn't go to this one, as it was a Richmond home game.

1. Richmond home game.
2. It appeared the crowd was mainly pro-Hawks - though that could have been just microphone positioning. The roar when port/bris score went up was funny - almost the biggest of the entire night.

From those that were there, was it a 50/50 split? Or were the tigers outnumbered at their own home game?

I was there as a neutral, the crowd was 65% tigers and 35% pets
 

Log in to remove this ad.

You mean the clash between 11th and 14th tonight? Not really a game you'd expect would draw a massive crowd. Unlike a game between say, 4th and 2nd - you'd expect that to pull at least 50k. Oh wait....


.. errr.. 47K out of 50K capacity Docklands stadium.. is nothing to be ashamed of? Embarassing post.
 
Why do these "Lets measure our old fellas" crowd size threads always pop up? The funniest part about this one is it was started by a North supporter.
 
i think their 1 game membershit package has been used up....

Disgusting team and supporters.. We're looking forward to ripping them a new arseh*le week 1 of finals....
 
It is a pity Richmond can't repay their loyal fans by making the finals more than once in the last 15 years.
At least we still have loyal fans. :thumbsu:
 
i think their 1 game membershit package has been used up....

Disgusting team and supporters.. We're looking forward to ripping them a new arseh*le week 1 of finals....

Newsflash - It was Richmond's home game.
Richmond can't make finals, so it'd be hard for your cheating, corrupt band of mercenary criminals to beat them. Your 'team' will become the 2009 finals laughing stock :eek:
 
I think you'll find that 5K off the mark is generally a capcity crowd...lot's of tickets are sold corporately and then not used...


I think you'll find that sold corporate tickets are counted in those crowd figures via the "assumption" calculations on crowd figures.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Newsflash - It was Richmond's home game.
Richmond can't make finals, so it'd be hard for your cheating, corrupt band of mercenary criminals to beat them. Your 'team' will become the 2009 finals laughing stock :eek:


i thought we were talking about dawks and bitchmond.... find the right thread to vent.... one step at a time for you newbie, you'll get the hang of it soon...

By the way, 1 premiership in 50+ years is funnier for such a feral, scumbag filth club...

Get your lube ready for another GF loss.... i can't ****ing wait.........
 
WOW great stat, 15,000 more members yet only 4,000 more per game.

WOOF WOOF MEOW OINK BAAA the members have spoken

Shows that even when Geelong are rated as one of the best teams in the league they still can't pull a crowd consistently.

The 50,000 have shown their commitment to the club via their hip pocket. They don't all have to show up for an away game on a cold saturday night.
 
We play the majority of our games at a low capacity Skilled Staidum...
Shit how are all of you Hawthorn posters so dumb...
You genuinely think being 5K out of a full capacity crowd warrants warning signs? Or are you still a little bitter?

TC:eek:

We play 4 home games at a venue with a capacity 7,000 less than Skilled, fail

As many free loading bandwagoners as we've got, you still relied on us to draw your 2 biggest roll ups of the season, comfortably (rds 1 and 17)

Hawthorn and Richmond are real clubs, Geelong and North Melbourne by contrast are sadly batting above their weight divisions respectively
 
Neither side deserve to be regarded as big 4.

LOL. North are struggling to remain relevant at AFL level at all.

Sadly didn't go to this one, as it was a Richmond home game.

1. Richmond home game.

What the **** difference does that make? It was a Hawthorn membership replacement game, what a weak excuse for not showing up!
 
LOL Bradburys. You just defeated us in the last 5 minutes of the games and how was your must win game against St Kilda whilst they were resting a 1/4 of their team. The game against Richmond was your last chance at making the eight and yet about 10,000 of your 50,000 members botherd to show. Were you afraid that you were going to lose to Richmond and could not face another humiliation. We are irrelevant in being the 2nd team to defeat the leage leaders who are currently completing a training facility 2nd to none in the AFL and one of the youngest lists in the AFL, 30,000 members 2nd year running.

Having 10,000 out of 50,000 members see your must win game shows how your fans thing of the relevance of your Bradbury, Tasmanian club.
 
LOL Bradburys. You just defeated us in the last 5 minutes of the games and how was your must win game against St Kilda whilst they were resting a 1/4 of their team. The game against Richmond was your last chance at making the eight and yet about 10,000 of your 50,000 members botherd to show. Were you afraid that you were going to lose to Richmond and could not face another humiliation. We are irrelevant in being the 2nd team to defeat the leage leaders who are currently completing a training facility 2nd to none in the AFL and one of the youngest lists in the AFL, 30,000 members 2nd year running.

Having 10,000 out of 50,000 members see your must win game shows how your fans thing of the relevance of your Bradbury, Tasmanian club.

Yawn. Come up with some new material, pal - this old shite is getting somewhat boring. :rolleyes:
 
LOL Bradburys. You just defeated us in the last 5 minutes of the games and how was your must win game against St Kilda whilst they were resting a 1/4 of their team. The game against Richmond was your last chance at making the eight and yet about 10,000 of your 50,000 members botherd to show. Were you afraid that you were going to lose to Richmond and could not face another humiliation. We are irrelevant in being the 2nd team to defeat the leage leaders who are currently completing a training facility 2nd to none in the AFL and one of the youngest lists in the AFL, 30,000 members 2nd year running.

Having 10,000 out of 50,000 members see your must win game shows how your fans thing of the relevance of your Bradbury, Tasmanian club.

:rolleyes: We might have had a couple of ordinary crowds between 33-35k this year (three from memory), but we've never had 15,000 turn up on a Saturday afternoon in glorious sunshine :eek:

North fans paying out on crowd figures - FAIL
 

Remove this Banner Ad

34,000...... Hawks and Tigers are not big 4 or even big 8

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top