NSWCROW
Make me an Admin!
Watchin highlights now ( **** you 9 )
Can't tell which was the shitter dismissal between bairstow or ali
Can't tell which was the shitter dismissal between bairstow or ali
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He isnt a spud. But he also isnt a genuine test average 50-55 player.
Had an incredible start and rode some luck early , now teams bowl better to him and his performance has flattened out to his ability more.
Most likely 40-45 average at test level.
The other potential match defining moments came shortly after when Stokes was dropped twice, once by Starc and then Murphy. Starcs was difficult. But Murphy's was a dolly that should have been snuffled.
This could be the deciding moment of the match and also the series.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Would love that to happen, but we seem incapable this test of batting more than. a session.We need to be still batting at Tea.
If we aren't we're in a spot of bother.
I watched the second test stokes innings again this morning. If they'd played this match on cricket grounds he'd have been out about 15 times. Only one of his sixes was actually off the middle of the bat, the rest were top edged and just over the rope. He's been dropped 6 times in his last two innings and survived an umpire's call. He well could have scored 220 for 7 outs. Which pretty much matches his career average. Cannot wait for him to tour a real country with real grounds. Maybe I'll cede Adelaide to him, but then I did say "real grounds"He wasn't helped by bowling with a 55m boundary behind him either.
He will take 200 test wickets put your house on it.Agreed. Murphy actually bowled well to Stokes. He didn't get to the pitch of any of those 6s except the one full toss. He kept his cool. I rate him
The problem is, the replacements. Who would likely do better? Its unlikely they would do worse, but actually do better? And The Oval is arguably the one place Warner could score a few runs.If Warner plays another Test in this series, it'll prove that there's a gold pass system in place in Australia, and Stuart Broad will think Christmas has come early.
Yep, totally negative tacticsStill baffled by some of the tactics to the tail.
If my grandma came out to bat at number 11, instead of executing a yorker on middle peg, they’d pepper her with short pitched bowling for 20 overs.
Just do what England does and sub people off for no reason. Just tell the umps "Ryan Harris didn't like the taste of his coffee and can't field today"If we do drop Warner we would miss his catching at first slip big time.
I watched the second test stokes innings again this morning. If they'd played this match on cricket grounds he'd have been out about 15 times. Only one of his sixes was actually off the middle of the bat, the rest were top edged and just over the rope. He's been dropped 6 times in his last two innings and survived an umpire's call. He well could have scored 220 for 7 outs. Which pretty much matches his career average. Cannot wait for him to tour a real country with real grounds. Maybe I'll cede Adelaide to him, but then I did say "real grounds"
For me Marnus has been the big disappointment so far
If Will Pucovski was fully fit, Warner would have been gone years ago.The problem is, the replacements. Who would likely do better? Its unlikely they would do worse, but actually do better? And The Oval is arguably the one place Warner could score a few runs.
I would not have had him on the tour, or in the squad since the series in Pakistan tbh. I can't see a change happening now, and then he will be given his farewell tour as a media darling at home because somebody believes him simply being there is worth money. Then he'll bog off to the IPL and Seven's commentary box (or decide not to retire after all, and keep getting picked for two more years).
Not if you replace him with Green.If we do drop Warner we would miss his catching at first slip big time.
Lords is older than most of white Australia.They invented the game and most of their grounds have been around for a lot longer than all of ours: 3 of the 5 used in this series have existed since before any Australian grounds.
Not really sure why someone else gets to determine what a ‘real ground’ is.
I’m not sure how it would sound for an American to go to Scotland and bemoan how their golf courses aren’t real courses.
Those 2 dismissals could turn the whole series, he needs to stand up big time in the last 2 tests.Yep. For someone so chirpy he’d want to start backing it up
The grounds have been around forever. They are real grounds.I watched the second test stokes innings again this morning. If they'd played this match on cricket grounds he'd have been out about 15 times. Only one of his sixes was actually off the middle of the bat, the rest were top edged and just over the rope. He's been dropped 6 times in his last two innings and survived an umpire's call. He well could have scored 220 for 7 outs. Which pretty much matches his career average. Cannot wait for him to tour a real country with real grounds. Maybe I'll cede Adelaide to him, but then I did say "real grounds"