Open question - does anyone feel like this is a little argument against the "me too" movement?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Graham is on the same drugs as Trump. She hadn't even finished testifying before he started ranting.
Will be confirmed quickly - its too close to the midterms for any Republicans to go rogue. This is politicking from both parties for the midterms (in b4 people say this was only the Democrats).They're going to ram him through anyway after all this. They're so brazen about not caring when it's their side.
That's not as simple as it sounds though.Doesn’t need to be completely fake just need a situation where both parties present and intoxicated becomes a he say vs she says. It is enough for mud to stick in this type of situation (nomination for office in the Puritan states of America). Agree not the same as criminal proceedings
Go awayPlease post link to demonstrate truth of this assertion.
Which is a bit sad when you think about it.This story has legs because of a huge number of reasons. She's a dr, which gives her story credibility.
Interestingly, its the word of a doctor vs the word of a lawyer.Which is a bit sad when you think about it.
"I never got laid. They all got kicky and screamy whenever I tried." - Kavanaugh
Rape apologist to rape enthusiast, what a dynamic. Welcome to Trump's America, what a f***ing shithole.
Go away
Glad you mention the female prosecuter i thought it was a good move from the first few rounds that i watched.Graham is on the same drugs as Trump. She hadn't even finished testifying before he started ranting.
The only decent person from their side was the prosecutor until the last break then she tried to change but not that much, she had ethics.
No way would I report just to be their political football.
And the night ended well for Graham in Trumpworld. He ate Chick-Fil-awith Fox News host Sean Hannity.
Yes, well, things did change. The Republicans realised Mitchell wasn't gaining them any Brownie points, so they did away with her when it came to questioning Kavanaugh.Glad you mention the female prosecuter i thought it was a good move from the first few rounds that i watched.
Instead of using 10 republicans attacking her they used Mitchell instead..i think the Republicans got that one right.
Even Fox was saying that she isn't landing any punches at the start and that the Republicans are losing the battle. But i liked the way Mitchell went about it
Fill me in if things changed as i didn't watch it all just had a quick read on all the events.
I didn't believe that Ford would end up testifying so she proved me wrong there.
Allies of President Donald Trump had soured on Mitchell doing all the questioning for Republicans. Back at the White House, the feeling was similar. Mitchell's methodical and calculated approach does not exactly illicit high ratings.
Ok thanks so Mitchell was meant to ask Kavanagh the questions but Republicans changed tactics. I'll have a read.Yes, well, things did change. The Republicans realised Mitchell wasn't gaining them any Brownie points, so they did away with her when it came to questioning Kavanaugh.
https://nordic.businessinsider.com/...r-brett-kavanaugh-vote-set-for-friday-2018-9/
Mitchell was pretty consistent. After the last break, she tried to get more but nothing really.Glad you mention the female prosecuter i thought it was a good move from the first few rounds that i watched.
Instead of using 10 republicans attacking her they used Mitchell instead..i think the Republicans got that one right.
Even Fox was saying that she isn't landing any punches at the start and that the Republicans are losing the battle. But i liked the way Mitchell went about it
Fill me in if things changed as i didn't watch it all just had a quick read on all the events.
I didn't believe that Ford would end up testifying so she proved me wrong there.
Ok thanks so Mitchell was meant to ask Kavanagh the questions but Republicans changed tactics. I'll have a read.
Graham has his own reasons for going hard now. He is trying to win back the trump vote after unsuccessfully trying to break it previously
I'd respect him more if he was a man of his convictions rather than one trying to win back supporters he once spurned
This one's for both yebiga & Werewolf.....Time to wakey, wakey up to the BS fellas.
That's actually a pretty good video and I'd agree with 90% of it. The criticism of Iran is certainly harsh (although they do bring some problems on themselves), being too friendly with Israel and the Saudis is somewhat concerning, but I suspect Trump's trying to deal with enemies piecemeal rather than take them all on at once. That might mean letting them get away with murder for now. As I've said before, Trump won't invade Syria or Iran.
But I understand your point of view and you may turn out to be right. BTW surely you know how to tag by now?
The role is attorney general will become vacant soon - he is aiming for this possiblyYep, disingenuous piece of crap. He's been talking shit about Trump for the past 3 years then suddenly he tries to fly the flag.
Chief we were talking about the mid termsThat's what Trump did BEFORE his election.
Then when evidence came out about interference, he didn't want to hear about it.
I don't know what you are reading but it doesn't appear to be related to the facts in any real way.