Player Watch #6 Logan McDonald

[sataris]

This is just me personally, but I'm not really a fan of "source-shaming", for lack of better words.

There are a number of people on this site with sources and I think everyone should be encouraged to share what they know, or what they've heard, without fear of retribution if it turns out to not be 100% accurate. And that can happen. There's always a chance the information you receive from your source, or your source receives from someone else, could be inaccurate, incomplete, outdated, or subject to change in the future.

It can end up like one big game of Telephone, but it should still be seen as a positive if someone decides to include this board in it.

You forgot to add , 'completely made up'.

 

[Dubai Quacker]

The Kings are ordinary.

JUH isn’t kicking goals.

Cadman just got dropped.

Only Amiss is really looking as good as Logan to my eye.

 

[.Shotties.]

This is just me personally, but I'm not really a fan of "source-shaming", for lack of better words.
.

I don't either, providing they haven't spent a long amount of time talking down to others as a result of this information.

 

[the hypnotoad]

I don't either, providing they haven't spent a long amount of time talking down to others as a result of this information.

touche

 

[MightyBloods]

The Kings are ordinary.

JUH isn’t kicking goals.

Cadman just got dropped.

Only Amiss is really looking as good as Logan to my eye.

I do like Melbourne's van Rooyen. Why Melbourne don't play him deep from the goal square is beyond me.

 

[The Mares Leg]

I don't either, providing they haven't spent a long amount of time talking down to others as a result of this information.

Yes, respect and delivery is everything, especially on our own board.

 

[The King!]

The odd social media comment about how can Sydney afford everyone ... signed our own player back up

 

[FreeAgent1]

This is just me personally, but I'm not really a fan of "source-shaming", for lack of better words.

There are a number of people on this site with sources and I think everyone should be encouraged to share what they know, or what they've heard, without fear of retribution if it turns out to not be 100% accurate. And that can happen. There's always a chance the information you receive from your source, or your source receives from someone else, could be inaccurate, incomplete, outdated, or subject to change in the future.

It can end up like one big game of Telephone, but it should still be seen as a positive if someone decides to include this board in it.

But can we all agree SparkeLord was a good read?

I completely forgot about that until Hairy brought it up.

More SparkleLord I say!

 

[rustycrate]

But can we all agree SparkeLord was a good read?

I completely forgot about that until Hairy brought it up.

More SparkleLord I say!

I liked the SparkleLord. He was original. And almost believable. He had craft the way he assembled his posts.

 

[RedBloodBlackSwan]

But can we all agree SparkeLord was a good read?

I completely forgot about that until Hairy brought it up.

More SparkleLord I say!

I say we get SparkleLord down to the Bear and Bandicoot and we can all reminisce about old Sam Reid stories

 

[The Mares Leg]

Lets face it - unless it’s the player or the Manager, player movement stuff is ‘locker room’ gossip.

Doesn’t mean it has no value - mostly it is a fair indication.

But it’s hardly something to make you ‘king of the internet’.

Lets all pitch in, and kudos to who gets it right.

 

[Kennedy Parker]

Stoked to have him for another 4 years and looks like he’s living his best life in the red and white which is awesome.

FWIW, he currently has more total goals than both Curnow and McKay did at the same age.

 

[Heeney2Franklin]

Lets face it - unless it’s the player or the Manager, player movement stuff is ‘locker room’ gossip.

Doesn’t mean it has no value - mostly it is a fair indication.

But it’s hardly something to make you ‘king of the internet’.

Lets all pitch in, and kudos to who gets it right.

Its always the manager that leaks the negiotiations

 

[BloodySwan]

But can we all agree SparkeLord was a good read?

I completely forgot about that until Hairy brought it up.

More SparkleLord I say!

SparkleLord was a great read. Top tier fan fic

 

[bedford]

I do like Melbourne's van Rooyen. Why Melbourne don't play him deep from the goal square is beyond me.

We could've got him before Sheldrick

 

[bedford]

I don't either, providing they haven't spent a long amount of time talking down to others as a result of this information.

That's very fair Shots

 

[Dubai Quacker]

We could've got him before Sheldrick

Both Claremont boys & Don Pyke had the inside word on both.

We evidently either rated Gus higher, or saw inside mid as the greater need (or both).

Is JVR better than Logan? Pack marking, probably yes - but around the ground, no way.

 

[bedford]

Both Claremont boys & Don Pyke had the inside word on both.

We evidently either rated Gus higher, or saw inside mid as the greater need (or both).

But is JVR better than Logan? Pack marking, probably yes - but around the ground, no way.

He can pinch hit probably better in the ruck

 

[Kiama Chris]

Both Claremont boys & Don Pyke had the inside word on both.

We evidently either rated Gus higher, or saw inside mid as the greater need (or both).

But is JVR better than Logan? Pack marking, probably yes - but around the ground, no way.

IIRC didn't Grainger-Barrass dust him up in Colts? Was there a question mark over his ticker? Some such.

 

[Dubai Quacker]

IIRC didn't Grainger-Barrass dust him up in Colts? Was there a question mark over his ticker? Some such.

DGB did actually have the better of Logan in the match I saw in their draft year.

But the question was never on Logan’s ticker or aerobic capacity. The talk was actually all around how good DGB was. It wasn’t the only game DGB dominated.

We would (if reports are to believed) have taken DGB if North didn’t go with Phillips.

A real sliding doors moment.

 

[bedford]

DGB did actually have the better of Logan in the match I saw in their draft year.

But the question was never on Logan’s ticker or aerobic capacity. The talk was actually all around how good DGB was. It wasn’t the only game DGB dominated.

We would (if reports are to believed) have taken DGB if North didn’t go with Phillips.

A real sliding doors moment.

I was with a Hawks coach at that time and they were desperate for Logan

 

[caesar88]

DGB did actually have the better of Logan in the match I saw in their draft year.

But the question was never on Logan’s ticker or aerobic capacity. The talk was actually all around how good DGB was. It wasn’t the only game DGB dominated.

We would (if reports are to believed) have taken DGB if North didn’t go with Phillips.

A real sliding doors moment.

Still early days but geez some from that 2020 draft would want to get a wriggle on to prevent it from being arguably the worst draft in recent memory

 

[BloodySwan]

I was with a Hawks coach at that time and they were desperate for Logan

Logan was considered the best prospect in his draft from many watchers. I still cannot believe he fell to us

 

[Dubai Quacker]

Still early days but geez some from that 2020 draft would want to get a wriggle on to prevent it from being arguably the worst draft in recent memory

And to think. No club rated a bloke called Errol in the top 30 picks in what is turning out to be a dud draft year.

 

[Kiama Chris]

And to think. No club rated a bloke called Errol in the top 30 picks in what is turning out to be a dud draft year.

Too small.