AFL Player # 7: Indefatigable Zach Merrett (c) - 5 time Crichton Medallist! 🏅🏅🏅🏅🏅

Remove this Banner Ad

To be fair, we haven't actually traded any of those players...
It would be interesting to hear if those advocating for a trade are up for trading more than 1 (and how many), but I'd be pretty confident in saying very, very few want them all traded.

BLOW THE JOINT UP

TRADE EM ALL

explosion GIF
 
To be fair, we haven't actually traded any of those players...
It would be interesting to hear if those advocating for a trade are up for trading more than 1 (and how many), but I'd be pretty confident in saying very, very few want them all traded.
Because everyone is boring and can't handle chaos
 
So we are trading Merrett now too (cause Parish, Shiel and McGrath werent enough) less than 12 months after signing a 6 year deal?

Cool, let's just trade away all our good players. Sounds great :thumbsu:
It's interesting discussion at least.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

To be fair, we haven't actually traded any of those players...
It would be interesting to hear if those advocating for a trade are up for trading more than 1 (and how many), but I'd be pretty confident in saying very, very few want them all traded.

I have advocated for trading them all (or at least most). For the record, I like them all as players but I don't think any of them can be the best or second best midfielder in a premiership team. So unless Hobbs or Perkins or #3 draft pick go past Merrett and Parish - and do so within three to four years - then we aren't building a premiership contender.

There are a couple of important factors that have influenced my view:

1. How much value will our primary midfielders provide in 2025 and beyond? In 2025, Shiel is 32, Stringer is 31, Merrett is 30, Parish is 28, Langford is 28 and McGrath is 27.

2. Do we have enough top-end talent to compete with the league's best sides without accumulating more draft assets? How would we accumulate those assets?

We have some really valuable trade assets and they happen to be players who are unlikely to be part of our next contending team. Merrett is one of those assets. We could potentially trade him for two first round picks and if we got creative by partially paying his contract we could potentially extract even more from a team in 'win-now' mode. The case for trading, say, Shiel or Stringer is even stronger since they have no hope of contributing meaningfully to a good Essendon side.

Essendon has been a consistent middle-of-the-table side for much of the past two-decades. We've only truly bottomed out once - from 2005 to 2010 - and outside that we've always been making 'win-now' moves. It's never worked for us and I do think we need to break that cycle.

We'd enjoy more long-term success by bottoming out properly, accumulating draft assets and picking the eyes out of the next three drafts. We aren't going to win a premiership with a midfield led by Merrett and Parish. The league's best midfields are bigger than us, stronger than us and outwork us. If we don't change that then we aren't really building for a premiership; merely pretending to.

If I had my way I'd try to trade Merrett to a contender - he's been a good servant of the club and I'd like to see him play and win finals - so I'd be targeting teams like Geelong or Richmond or the Western Bulldogs. If I could do the same with Parish then I would have six first round picks over the next two-years. That's the type of thing that can fundamentally change a team's trajectory. Even if you don't draft anyone as good as Merrett or Parish you are still likely to add 4 to 6 guys that are in your best 22 in three years time.

Another way of looking at it is to examine past decisions. Would Essendon today be better or worse off had we traded Hurley or Hooker or Heppell or Zaharakis? Only a few years ago each of these players had considerable trade value. We could have accumulated talent that could have contributed meaningfully to our success over the next decade. Instead we have one that will retire this year, two that have already retired and one that possibly should retire. Not one of them played in a winning final and there is an awfully good chance that we will say the same about guys like Merrett.

If we want to enjoy success then we need to be thinking more about the medium-to-long term than purely about what might help us to win games today.
 
It is if we can get more this year
You reckon someone is going to give a top 8 pick for parish this year? Can’t see anyone in the bottom 8 currently who needs a parish type of player and would be willing to give up their pick. I’d say it’s a huge chance geelong offer him a long term deal next year. Danger almost done, selwood done, Hawkins probably close to done. They’ll have cash to spend.
 
You reckon someone is going to give a top 8 pick for parish this year? Can’t see anyone in the bottom 8 currently who needs a parish type of player and would be willing to give up their pick. I’d say it’s a huge chance geelong offer him a long term deal next year. Danger almost done, selwood done, Hawkins probably close to done. They’ll have cash to spend.
I think we can get a first and then some this year. St. Kilda if they miss the 8 would be willing to pay it IMO
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

He’s not a huge man Zak but he’s clearly our best tackler, outstanding technique.
I was surprised at how few he had registered (6), 3 of them were very very good, 2 may even have been holding the balls (one versus Warner, the other against Rowbottom I think)
 
I was surprised at how few he had registered (6), 3 of them were very very good, 2 may even have been holding the balls (one versus Warner, the other against Rowbottom I think)
Just think it’s something that’s overlooked in his game. He has the absolute class to go with the work ethic.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

AFL Player # 7: Indefatigable Zach Merrett (c) - 5 time Crichton Medallist! 🏅🏅🏅🏅🏅

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top