
Beerfish
Unscripted Hot Takes








- Jan 20, 2008
- 62,865
- 106,206
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- Nic Martin
- Moderator
- #3,991
Last edited by a moderator:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 0
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Jon Ralph on fox footy.I just looked at Ralph's twitter.
Nothing until the suspension announced.
Right. So dozens of articles is 1 article and a couple of sound bites.Jon Ralph on fox footy.
Check fox footy page. Check triple m page. Check Jay Clark page.
It's been like 2 hours since the Collingwood game.
It's been over a day since our game ended.
The fact there are more articles about the Merrett charge than the Adams tackle is entirely logical.
If by this time tomorrow the Adams tackle hasn't been charged, we can start putting the tin foil hats on
Right. So dozens of articles is 1 article and a couple of sound bites
My issue is there wasn't even half a dozen articles.Fox Footy literally tweeted three times in a row.
Triple M a few times, similar with Jay Clark. Would me saying half a dozen make you feel better?
Not exactly sure what your issue is.
Happy to move on.
My issue is there wasn't even half a dozen articles.
Couple of sound bites and 1 article the day after the game = media has it in for us because 2 hours after another game they haven't mentioned one incident.
Yes. I was laughing at people who were pre-emptively complaining about media and MRO bias.You had an issue even before that. Rather than discuss the actual footage, you were cracking in at people “melting in the comments”
Anyway, back to the original point, it’s likely that Adams will cop a suspension.
His rate of suspension for when the player in question is playing Collingwood that week suggests otherwiseI wouldn't go that far. He has been erring on the side of heavier penalties all year.
I suspect that will be the precedent we bring in.
why? isn't that the purpose of an online forum if that's what the posters want to do?Yes. I was laughing at people who were pre-emptively complaining about media and MRO bias.
Absolutely. And I want to laugh at them.why? isn't that the purpose of an online forum if that's what they posters want to do?
why do you want to laugh at them rather than address the point being made - bias/no bias in MROAbsolutely. And I want to laugh at them.
As you said, I'm allowed to if I want to.
Is this an empirical analysis?His rate of suspension for when the player in question is playing Collingwood that week suggests otherwise
Me laughing is addressing the point. Let's wait for the MRO to actually assess the game before melting over it.why do you want to laugh at them rather than address the point being made - bias/no bias in MRO
Unless Geelong had someone suspended before the round 1 clash, as far as I can tell only Nathan Broad has missed the Pies via suspension in the previous game?Is this an empirical analysis?
re bolded, yeah, nah. "Melting" or even just talking about bias/perceived bias about MRO (part of the game) is different to belittling posters by laughing about whether there was half a dozen/dozen tweets by the media.Me laughing is addressing the point. Let's wait for the MRO to actually assess the game before melting over it.
Unless Geelong had someone suspended before the round 1 clash, as far as I can tell only Nathan Broad has missed the Pies via suspension in the previous game?
And that was clearly weeks.
The intent and the action should be the only things considered.High - subbed out
Medium - came off
Low - took his kick
Should be that east shouldn't it?
agreed - it’s bullshit you have to havefewtag belt people now, you never saw Hird and Wanganeen having to havefewtag belt people to win brownlowsThey have to takecthis all the way
May aswell goto touch footy rules where you just havefewtag belt that people pull out instead of tackling.
While climbing on your high horse maybe you could've read my posts.re bolded, yeah, nah. "Melting" or even just talking about bias/perceived bias about MRO (part of the game) is different to belittling posters by laughing about whether there was half a dozen/dozen tweets by the media.
not going to die in a ditch about this, just think it's more interesting to talk about the game than how posters express their views. Laugh away..